Started By
Message
locked post

Anyone else really nervous about our offensive tackle situation?

Posted on 3/24/13 at 1:06 pm
Posted by LSUZombie
A Cemetery Near You
Member since Apr 2008
28875 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 1:06 pm
We have two pretty big holes on each side of the line. I know we are built strong in the middle, and Brees can turn an average OT into an $8 mil a year player, but I'm really curious what we plan on doing.

My guess would be trying to sign Bryant McKinnie to a friendly two year deal. Maybe this will give us more time to analyze Charles Brown and see if he's really our future.

I also hope we pull a trade with the Vikings so they can move up to grab a stud receiver. We could fall back and get the best defensive prospect and also snag someone to play RT (maybe Fluker from Bama or Watson from FSU?)

It's too damn quiet and I want some news

What do you think the Saints plans are for the tackle situation?
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
7104 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 1:08 pm to
3rd or 4th round draft pick
Posted by MISSIPSAINT
Magee
Member since Feb 2013
438 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 1:16 pm to
Sign a vet! if not use a late rd. pick in draft.
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32856 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 1:19 pm to
I'm not as down on Brown as everyone else is. It'd be great if we sign McKinnie. If not, get a 4th rounder and call it a day.
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 1:21 pm to
You consider still having Strief on the right side a hole?

Maybe we could improve, but he is far from horrible. Hell he's consistently been better than Bushrod.

As far as LT, yes there is a huge question mark there. We have Brown but he's often injured and struggled at the LT spot(though played well at RT). We also have Marcel Jones who perhaps could show something there, though he is far from proven.

If we don't sign a young FA I wouldn't be surprised if they went LT early.
Posted by Cajun Invasion
Abbeville, Louisianna
Member since Jan 2012
1799 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 1:26 pm to
I think they plan on getting to more LTs to go with Brown, either Mckinnie and a draft pick or most likely to draft picks imo.

But to answer your question about being nervous, no not really, Saints are great at plugging in guys we never herd of and making them stars on the oline.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 1:30 pm to
I'm gettin pretty pissed/angry that the saints have signed a cornerback and pretty much nothing else
Posted by bountyhunter
North of Houston a bit
Member since Mar 2012
6325 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

I'm gettin pretty pissed/angry that the saints have signed a cornerback and pretty much nothing else

I'm the polar opposite. The first part of Free Agency is not when teams on a budget should pick up players. I like the Keenan Lewis signing - he fills a need (not the most important one, granted) and he came in at a home-based discount. The OT market is a bit inflated this year, if we jumped in and grabbed the best available to fill our highest position of need, that would have been our only move in FA.

They still have more money to spend. I think we still get one maybe two more impact players out of FA. One of those being OT.
This post was edited on 3/24/13 at 1:57 pm
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 1:57 pm to
It's about players' asking price vs. what teams are offering.

Obviously VERY few guys are signing at the moment because they are trying to get mid level money like years past.

Problem is very few teams have that kind of money to spend, and the ones who do mostly aren't looking at a lot of these guys because they are only spending big money on big names.

It's a waiting game. No team is wowing these guys with their offer and they don't want to take less money.

Edit:
The reason we got Lewis is because he came here on a cheaper deal. Had he wanted more money from us we likely would have signed no one yet.
This post was edited on 3/24/13 at 1:59 pm
Posted by BayouFann
CenLa
Member since Jun 2012
6868 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 1:59 pm to
Nope. After accomplishing what we did with bushrod, why would any person with reason be worried?!! Why worry about a staff that had to make moves at center and rt and still had a top offense? If we didnt have brees and SP, then u have valid worries. There are six stud lineman that could easily go in the first rnd. That means there are platinum pickings for SP even if he wanted wait til rnds 3-6 like usual. Trust
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 2:02 pm to
quote:


My guess would be trying to sign Bryant McKinnie to a friendly two year deal.


I'm about 99% certain we'll get him, so I'm not remotely nervous.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64073 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 2:14 pm to
quote:


Nope. After accomplishing what we did with bushrod, why would any person with reason be worried?!! Why worry about a staff that had to make moves at center and rt and still had a top offense? If we didnt have brees and SP, then u have valid worries.


Well Bushrod wasn't a bad player at all.

Our WRs are getting older/aren't exactly great at getting seperation.

Brees is getting older as well, although he hasn't really started to regress.

Everyone takes our "top offense" for granted but the NFL catches up quickly. We can play it off as coaching inconsistency and playcalling but our offense stalled A LOT last year and our mediocre talent on the outside definitely played a part in that. Just because we've made do with marginal players in the past doesn't necessarily mean we can/should continue to do so if the situation to greatly improve presents itself. Our nucleus is getting older/leaving. How we replace it will go a long way in determining if we make it back deep in the playoffs or not.
This post was edited on 3/24/13 at 2:15 pm
Posted by MISSIPSAINT
Magee
Member since Feb 2013
438 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 2:25 pm to
IMO our offense stalled because we obviously were missing the best play caller in the game and also we were not balanced on offense. We get a 50-50 ratio or even a 60-40 pass ratio we are back to ball control and the offense dictating defenses instead of vice versa.
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Well Bushrod wasn't a bad player at all.


He only gave up more combined pressures, hits, and sacks than ANY other FA tackle the last two years.

There's a reason they never even offered him a contract.

That said, he was healthy which is something Brown never seems to be.
This post was edited on 3/24/13 at 2:30 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166127 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 2:32 pm to
Bryce Harris is Willie Roafish
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64073 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

He only gave up more combined pressures, hits, and sacks than ANY other FA tackle the last two years.


And how many of those were from teams who attempted as many passes as the saints? I didn't think he was great or even a probowler or even that we should pay him. But we can't just throw a below average player and expect things to keep humming along.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63431 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Anyone else really nervous about our offensive tackle situation?


No. All of our attention should be devoted to signing a 32 year old cornerback to an insane contract.


On the other hand, you could argue . . .










that we're in deep shite without help at tackle.
Posted by xxKylexx
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2011
4039 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 4:28 pm to
LOL! What Strief are you watching? The only time he is serviceable is when we give him help.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30080 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

He only gave up more combined pressures, hits, and sacks than ANY other FA tackle the last two years.



Although I think bushrod was the weak link (think about it, we plugged and played so many RT due to injuries, but that side was fine), this number seems inflated in comparison to other teams that don't throw as much as us, right?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64156 posts
Posted on 3/24/13 at 5:02 pm to
Not yet.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram