- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NO/TOR/MEM hypothetical trade
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:30 am
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:30 am
Michael Mc posted this on twitter, I found it interesting.
LINK
NO: Lowry/Gray/Haddadi
TOR: Gay/Vasquez
MEM: Johnson/Lopez/Henry
Great for us, not so sure the others would roll with it.
But imagine if we pulled it off and signed Chandler... 5-7 seed in the second year of the program.
LINK
NO: Lowry/Gray/Haddadi
TOR: Gay/Vasquez
MEM: Johnson/Lopez/Henry
Great for us, not so sure the others would roll with it.
But imagine if we pulled it off and signed Chandler... 5-7 seed in the second year of the program.
9
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:33 am to BrowDown
quote:
But imagine if we pulled it off and signed Chandler... 5-7 seed in the second year of the program.
Chandler is under contract for the next couple of years.
Can't see the Grizzlies doing this, either.
This post was edited on 1/29/13 at 9:35 am
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:34 am to BrowDown
I really don't want to let go of Vasquez unless we are getting CP3 or possibly Bledsoe.
Lets just let things gel and see what happens. We are in the catbird seat right now.
Lets just let things gel and see what happens. We are in the catbird seat right now.
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:36 am to BrowDown
no thanks
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:38 am to BrowDown
quote:
Great for us, not so sure the others would roll with it.
WTF are you talking about?
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:38 am to touchdownjeebus
I agree with letting thinks play out, just found this interesting.
Interesting also is your higher ranking for Bledsoe than Lowry for us...
Interesting also is your higher ranking for Bledsoe than Lowry for us...
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:39 am to slutiger5
quote:
WTF are you talking about?
It creates some holes and issues for Memphis.
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:40 am to touchdownjeebus
quote:
I really don't want to let go of Vasquez unless we are getting CP3 or possibly Bledsoe.
You'd rather Bledsoe than Lowry?
C'mon man
This post was edited on 1/29/13 at 9:42 am
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:41 am to MrWiseGuy
quote:
Chandler is under contract for the next couple of years.
I know, I meant if we can get him for a second rounder or two.
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:48 am to BrowDown
I wouldn't be upset by this trade, but I don't want to part with Vasquez just yet
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:50 am to BrowDown
Not interested.
Lowry's a troublemaker and makes more than the General.
Haddadi is green and his contract expires before Lopez' team options run out.
Gray was unimpressive in his time here and I don't see that changing in a return.
On top of that, I don't see Memphis wanting Henry back considering they drafted him and traded him to us for peanuts.
Lowry's a troublemaker and makes more than the General.
Haddadi is green and his contract expires before Lopez' team options run out.
Gray was unimpressive in his time here and I don't see that changing in a return.
On top of that, I don't see Memphis wanting Henry back considering they drafted him and traded him to us for peanuts.
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:51 am to CovSaint53
Exactly, if you get rid of vasquez, you lose all progress made. Even Gordon depends on Greivas. He will be a top 10 PG that you cant lose.
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:51 am to CovSaint53
The upgrade on perimeter defense, ability to attack the basket and draw fouls would be well worth it.
No way I would trade Vasquez to get Bledsoe, though.
No way I would trade Vasquez to get Bledsoe, though.
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:56 am to slutiger5
quote:
Even Gordon depends on Greivas.
No, no he doesn't.
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:56 am to BrowDown
quote:
Great for us
wut
Posted on 1/29/13 at 9:58 am to GynoSandberg
yes yes, he does, right now atleast. i have seen 1 or 2 spurts we takes over but in general he is still following greivas.
Posted on 1/29/13 at 10:12 am to slutiger5
I'd rather get a SF back. Rumors are that Memphis wants a draft pick, too.
Not sure if they have what we want... maybe if you add in a fourth team?
Like
This
We take the Linus Kleiza tax for facilitating and get Wilson Chandler out of the deal... and only give up Lopez. Although apparently Denver wants to get rid of Mosgov too, so you could do it like this too... LINK
Not sure if they have what we want... maybe if you add in a fourth team?
Like
This
We take the Linus Kleiza tax for facilitating and get Wilson Chandler out of the deal... and only give up Lopez. Although apparently Denver wants to get rid of Mosgov too, so you could do it like this too... LINK
This post was edited on 1/29/13 at 10:15 am
Posted on 1/29/13 at 2:24 pm to Rev1897
This trade is full of so much retard. I have no idea why Mcnamara thinks this is remotely good for NO.
I would much rather Bledsoe or Jennings.
Now if we replaced Moobs Gray with Calderon, it might be worth it. Other than that, we're just depleting our team for a position that I dont feel is the problem, PG.
I would much rather Bledsoe or Jennings.
Now if we replaced Moobs Gray with Calderon, it might be worth it. Other than that, we're just depleting our team for a position that I dont feel is the problem, PG.
Posted on 1/29/13 at 2:26 pm to BrowDown
quote:
Great for us
Uhh, no
Posted on 1/29/13 at 3:03 pm to chatchit42
quote:
I would much rather Bledsoe or Jennings.
You'd rather Eric Bledsoe than Kyle Lowry?
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News