Started By
Message

Mozgov trade vs. Asik trade

Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:18 pm
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32853 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:18 pm
Not that anyone thinks it was a great trade for Cleveland, but considering the price that Cleveland just paid for Mozgov, do you feel a lot better about the Asik trade now?

Pelicans get Asik and $1.5 Million
Houston gets 2015 1st round draft pick

Cavs get Mosgov and 2nd round draft pick
Denver gets 2 1st round draft picks


quote:

In exchange for Asik, the Rockets will receive the Pelicans' 2015 first-round draft pick. The Rockets also will include $1.5 million in cash as part of the deal.


Asik 7'0" 28 years old


7.4 RBG
0.6 APG
0.9 BPG
20.0 MPG
.532 FG%
5.7 PPG

quote:

The Cavs will send a future pick they own from the Memphis Grizzlies from a 2013 trade and a first-rounder they acquired from the Oklahoma City Thunder earlier this week in a deal involving Dion Waiters. In addition to Mozgov, the Cavs also get a 2015 second-round pick in return.


Mozgov 7'0" 28 years old

4.9 RPG
0.5 APG
0.9 BPG
17.2 MPG
.513 FG%
6.4 PPG
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25396 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:24 pm to
what makes me mad is that we didn't trade them Asik.
I would gladly take two first round picks for him.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27299 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:24 pm to
The Asik trade was a 3 team trade. Rockets got the Pelicans first round pick and Trevor Ariza for Asik.

I know the Pelicans only really gave up the first rounder, but what was acquired for Asik was more than just a first round pick.
This post was edited on 1/8/15 at 12:26 pm
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61434 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

what was acquired for Asik was more than just a first round pick.


You mean a trade exception for the Wiz. Didn't y'all have the cap space to sign Ariza outright?
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32853 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

I know the Pelicans only really gave up the first rounder, but what was acquired for Asik was more than just a first round pick.


Yeah, the pick was really what I was getting at. The Cleveland deal seems desperate, but it looks like we got a better player at a better price.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27299 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:29 pm to
I actually don't remember how exactly it went down. I just remember Ariza was involved in that trade somehow.
Posted by MrPappagiorgio
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2009
41122 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:31 pm to
Both of those picks will be late 1st, and they may not see the Memphis pick until 2019 due to protections

quote:

The Thunder pick is top-18-protected this year and top-15-protected in each of the following years. The Grizzlies' pick will go to Denver if it falls between picks 6-14 in the next two years and is top-five-protected for two years after that.


Not to mention Mozgov has a $4.5m team option next year... Asik will cost twice that for a one year rental

Asik is a better player, yes... but I dont think we should use this deal as some sort of justification
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115343 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:31 pm to
They were going to acquire Ariza if there was a trade or not. I don't see the trade that way.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61434 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

I just remember Ariza was involved in that trade somehow.


I'm almost positive the main beneficiary of Ariza getting traded rather than signed was Washington. Maybe they agreed to not bid up his price anymore if they got a trade exception out of it.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27299 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:44 pm to
Here is the explanation:

"The trade, sources say, calls for the Pelicans to receive Asik, Rockets swingman Omri Casspi and $1.5 million in cash from Houston.

The three teams have all signed off on the deal, sources say, but it still requires league approval before it can be announced.

Sources say the Rockets, meanwhile, will get Ariza and his new four-year, $32 million deal, Pelicans guards Alonzo Gee and Scotty Hopson (and their unguaranteed contracts) as well as New Orleans' protected first-round pick in 2015. Washington, in this scenario, is only required to take back the unguaranteed contract of Melvin Ely from New Orleans while creating an $8.5 million trade exception through Ariza's exit that will expire one year from the date that this complicated transaction is made official."
Posted by mm2316
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Member since Aug 2010
6942 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:44 pm to
It's hard to compare, really. I was a fan of the Asik trade, and still thinks it makes sense after watching Steimsma get destroyed last year, but both of those 1sts are late round picks, and IIRC, at least one of them is pretty heavily protected anyway. With them getting an 2nd back (I remember reading the 2nd is expected be to early 2nd), they pretty much gave up a last 1st, and traded down one pick. Not to mention, they are more in a "win now" mode than we are.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27299 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:49 pm to
Asik is good I'm telling y'all. I don't know why he isn't making a bigger impact in New Orleans.
Posted by KindaRaw
Member since Jun 2014
3963 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Asik is good I'm telling y'all. I don't know why he isn't making a bigger impact in New Orleans.

I find that hard to believe. The dude has only taken 2 shots outside of the paint, and is barely shooting above .500 in the paint. He can't even catch, and when he does, it usually leads to some sort of TO, especially if he is trying to dunk from under the basket while being defended by 1 or 2 players. The only thing he's been useful for is posing as a statue as a way to "defend" smaller players driving to the basket, which works most of the time but not always. He stays getting owned by different centers/PFs every other night though. Not to mention he can't even make FTs, so other teams will just foul him since they know he can't shoot half of the time. I think the trade we made was horrible. He's definitely an upgrade over Stiesma, but that isn't saying much.
This post was edited on 1/8/15 at 12:57 pm
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25396 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Asik is good I'm telling y'all. I don't know why he isn't making a bigger impact in New Orleans.



because he isn't good.
he's so bad on offense he can't even stay on the court. hell, i dont' even trust him to grab a rebound on the defensive side at the end of games. It's as if he's holding a rock in each hand when he tries to grab the ball. Smaller guys out jump him and tip the ball away from him all the time. he's just not aggressive enough grabbing boards like he should be.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27299 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 1:38 pm to
Maybe he's hurt or maybe he's just not trying.

I have seen a few Pelicans games this year, and Asik looks like he's not even trying out there.

I don't know what the deal is, but he was beastly in Houston on the boards and on defense before he became disgruntled with his role on he team.
Posted by NOLAbaby
CumTown
Member since Sep 2013
1758 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 1:43 pm to
I'd rather have Asik over Mozgov for the price. Asik has his weaknesses (wouldn't ya know it, like everybody else), but he's still a really good complement to AD.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 2:50 pm to
Cavs overpaid, but have no choice. LeBron and Love can bolt this summer. Now that doesn't mean it was worth it; I doubt they get out of the East. Plus, that OKC pick was theirs for all of a day. They likely took that pick knowing they would move it immediately.

Nothing wrong with what the Pels paid for Asik. At all.

The criticism comes from moving Lopez, who has been a very good rim protector in Portland, to ride with Smiht, Steimsma, and Withey last year. Plus they had to sign Ajinca mid year and they gave him a guaranteed 2 year deal. Then they realize how terrible that entire plan was and send out a 1st for Asik. Asik is better than Lopez, but that's an awful timeline for a team that swears Davis is a 4 and is still very poor on defense.

Though they have been better the last 10 games (mid pack defensively, yet Asik has only averaged 23MPG over that stretch). Of course the offense has fallen off during that stretch and is scoring at a bottom 5-10 rate.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61434 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Nothing wrong with what the Pels paid for Asik. At all.


It is if it's a rental. You're the new GM and aren't attached to the pick that Dell got fired for trading. Do you offer $9-$10 to Asik, throw $6-$7 at Koufos, or go a different direction completely?
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25396 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Asik is better than Lopez


i'd rather Lopez personally.
His defense is just fine, he's not afraid to get dunked on, and he has a semblance of an offensive game.
Posted by NOLAbaby
CumTown
Member since Sep 2013
1758 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

throw $6-$7 at Koufos

Koufos is getting closer to $10mil in free agency unless he takes a "hometown discount" to stay with the Grizz. Right now he's a top 10 rim protector in the league (per nylon calculus ). A center deficient team will likely overpay for him.

God, Lopez sucked. Why does anybody still like that guy? You can't have seriously watched RL play and thought 'Man, what that guy does is awesome!'
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram