Started By
Message

re: Lineup for 2016

Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:23 am to
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278080 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Are you really comparing Buddy to any of those names



as opposed to comparing him to guys picked 19th and 20th in the 1st round?

sure

back then it was more vogue to stay in school 3-4 years than it is today. Thus giving much better comparisons for players in Buddy Hield's age range.



Collegiately he was as good as any of those guys pretty much. Moving on to professional basketball, he compares most favorably to guys like Michael Finley and Brandon Roy.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
420868 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Are you really comparing Buddy to any of those names

what's wrong about it?

are you implying that hield isn't really a plus talent like those guys?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
420868 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:26 am to
quote:

So, Lillards the only super productive one is the last 10 years.

because good players don't stay that long in college. that's the underlying issue
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278080 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:28 am to
quote:

It all comes down to whether you think Hiled can create his own at an above avg NBA level. I do not. I think he is a year or two away from being average at that, at best.



the way he shoots, it makes it a lot easier to be able to create his own shot. A lot of people didnt think Curry would be able to, or even a guy like McCollum(i know it took him a few years, but could have just been lack of opportunity). With a little craftiness he will be ok in that area.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166040 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:28 am to
All hield has to do is put up shots and that's what he's best at, he should be a 14-16 ppg guy or else this staff is dumb
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
420868 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:29 am to
ballhandling/driving/creation is the one area he needs major improvement in

that way he'll be able to take advantage of that insane FT%
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:30 am to
quote:

didn't used to, especially for the elite


College and NBA game used to be much more similar.

They are fundamentally different at this point.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
420868 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:31 am to
quote:

he should be a 14-16 ppg guy or else this staff is dumb

kind of my feeling, but maybe a notch lower (like 12-14 ppg)

there is no reason he shouldn't get 4-5 open threes a game in our offense

add in a few midrange jumpers and a couple FTs and it's not that difficult to imagine
Posted by BSB1988
Member since Jun 2016
383 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:31 am to
His numbers were great this year in college but my thing is college basketball players are not as good today as they were when those guys were playing in college so his numbers are not equal to those guys because the level of talent he was going against compared to them
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
420868 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:33 am to
quote:

College and NBA game used to be much more similar.

somewhat irrelevant b/c it's not about "the game"

it's about talent and body maturation with age. when you're 22-23 you're hitting the initial peak of development

so high talent guys coming in at 21-22 were much closer to their peaks early on

now those guys almost never stay 3-4 years so your 21-22 year olds these days are of much lesser talent

steph curry is pretty much the outlier in terms of guards making huge jumps later in career, and he put up 17.5 ppg as a rookie
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
420868 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:33 am to
quote:

His numbers were great this year in college but my thing is college basketball players are not as good today as they were when those guys were playing in college so his numbers are not equal to those guys because the level of talent he was going against compared to them

so he's not that good of a prospect?
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278080 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:35 am to
i dont disagree. my point is that i dont think his athleticism will be a limiting factor. It is more of a skill thing, which can be improved.

Based on the way he shoots, with some small tweaks, he'll be able to get better looks.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:38 am to
If you're talking defense, which we are with Hield, it is most certainly about the game.

I agree that Hield is a lesser talent. If you can't come out at 19/20, then there is a talent deficit relative to other NBA players.

Same time, I believe the old developmental timeline is a bit outdated. It's years in the league, not age. Certainly body and mind maturation matters, but after 4 years in the NBA, you generally are who you are. Whether that's 22 or 26.

And you develop much better, in the aggregate, coming to the NBA earlier IMO. Some chicken/egg to that (if you're good enough to come out early etc).
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
420868 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:38 am to
quote:

my point is that i dont think his athleticism will be a limiting factor. It is more of a skill thing, which can be improved.

oh i agree. if he makes that improvement he can be a 20 ppg guy for sure

i think we both agree it's not likely in year 1, but he can still put up even 15 ppg without it in year 1

having an 88% FT guy with some athleticism and a badass 3 makes me so hopeful that he can get some skills at driving b/c he can really do some damage with that outside-inside game if it develops. that's the ideal developmental arc

having a guy like AD pulling out bigs is the perfect setup for that
This post was edited on 7/4/16 at 10:39 am
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166040 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:41 am to
@WojVerticalNBA: Kevin Durant will sign with Golden State, he writes on the Players Tribune.

m.twitter.com/WojVerticalNBA
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
420868 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:41 am to
quote:

. It's years in the league, not age.

it's always been age and always will be age

biology makes it that way. it's just not easy to develop a body and create the same sort of developmental muscle memory past 23 or so. guys who make major body changes after that age often have severe sacrifices when they do that

then from 23-28 you find your athletic prime

by about 28, your body produces less testosterone and starts to break down so by 30 things get worrisome

unless you're lebron james
Posted by Crewz
Member since Jun 2014
5093 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:43 am to
I think, per usual, people are setting themselves up for disappointment.

Outliers occur, but the norm happens far more often because...well, it's the norm.

He will be a good player, but we all agree that he (like all rookies) will be a minus on the defensive end in year 1. Offensively, no non shot creator has put up significant points on a quality (40 or more wins) team in a long time

If he puts up the stats some of you are expecting, it is only because major injuries occurred. Personally, I think it will be better for him and for the team, if he had a quieter rookie year
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278080 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:43 am to
quote:

His numbers were great this year in college but my thing is college basketball players are not as good today as they were when those guys were playing in college so his numbers are not equal to those guys because the level of talent he was going against compared to them



punctuation is your friend, buddy
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
420868 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:45 am to
quote:

I think, per usual, people are setting themselves up for disappointment.

Outliers occur, but the norm happens far more often because...well, it's the norm.

then you're basically shitting on the draft pick

Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278080 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:47 am to
quote:

people are setting themselves up for disappointment.


because we expect him to be better than Aderian Payne, Jerian Grant, Frank Kaminsky & Delon Wright as rookies?


I dont think many people expect his numbers to be much better than what you profiled. I think he'll be closer to 15ppg but that is almost splitting hairs.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram