- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lineup for 2016
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:23 am to BSB1988
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:23 am to BSB1988
quote:
Are you really comparing Buddy to any of those names
as opposed to comparing him to guys picked 19th and 20th in the 1st round?
sure
back then it was more vogue to stay in school 3-4 years than it is today. Thus giving much better comparisons for players in Buddy Hield's age range.
Collegiately he was as good as any of those guys pretty much. Moving on to professional basketball, he compares most favorably to guys like Michael Finley and Brandon Roy.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:25 am to BSB1988
quote:
Are you really comparing Buddy to any of those names
what's wrong about it?
are you implying that hield isn't really a plus talent like those guys?
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:26 am to Crewz
quote:
So, Lillards the only super productive one is the last 10 years.
because good players don't stay that long in college. that's the underlying issue
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:28 am to Crewz
quote:
It all comes down to whether you think Hiled can create his own at an above avg NBA level. I do not. I think he is a year or two away from being average at that, at best.
the way he shoots, it makes it a lot easier to be able to create his own shot. A lot of people didnt think Curry would be able to, or even a guy like McCollum(i know it took him a few years, but could have just been lack of opportunity). With a little craftiness he will be ok in that area.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:28 am to SlowFlowPro
All hield has to do is put up shots and that's what he's best at, he should be a 14-16 ppg guy or else this staff is dumb
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:29 am to Lester Earl
ballhandling/driving/creation is the one area he needs major improvement in
that way he'll be able to take advantage of that insane FT%
that way he'll be able to take advantage of that insane FT%
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
didn't used to, especially for the elite
College and NBA game used to be much more similar.
They are fundamentally different at this point.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:31 am to Chad504boy
quote:
he should be a 14-16 ppg guy or else this staff is dumb
kind of my feeling, but maybe a notch lower (like 12-14 ppg)
there is no reason he shouldn't get 4-5 open threes a game in our offense
add in a few midrange jumpers and a couple FTs and it's not that difficult to imagine
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:31 am to SlowFlowPro
His numbers were great this year in college but my thing is college basketball players are not as good today as they were when those guys were playing in college so his numbers are not equal to those guys because the level of talent he was going against compared to them
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:33 am to corndeaux
quote:
College and NBA game used to be much more similar.
somewhat irrelevant b/c it's not about "the game"
it's about talent and body maturation with age. when you're 22-23 you're hitting the initial peak of development
so high talent guys coming in at 21-22 were much closer to their peaks early on
now those guys almost never stay 3-4 years so your 21-22 year olds these days are of much lesser talent
steph curry is pretty much the outlier in terms of guards making huge jumps later in career, and he put up 17.5 ppg as a rookie
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:33 am to BSB1988
quote:
His numbers were great this year in college but my thing is college basketball players are not as good today as they were when those guys were playing in college so his numbers are not equal to those guys because the level of talent he was going against compared to them
so he's not that good of a prospect?
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:35 am to SlowFlowPro
i dont disagree. my point is that i dont think his athleticism will be a limiting factor. It is more of a skill thing, which can be improved.
Based on the way he shoots, with some small tweaks, he'll be able to get better looks.
Based on the way he shoots, with some small tweaks, he'll be able to get better looks.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:38 am to SlowFlowPro
If you're talking defense, which we are with Hield, it is most certainly about the game.
I agree that Hield is a lesser talent. If you can't come out at 19/20, then there is a talent deficit relative to other NBA players.
Same time, I believe the old developmental timeline is a bit outdated. It's years in the league, not age. Certainly body and mind maturation matters, but after 4 years in the NBA, you generally are who you are. Whether that's 22 or 26.
And you develop much better, in the aggregate, coming to the NBA earlier IMO. Some chicken/egg to that (if you're good enough to come out early etc).
I agree that Hield is a lesser talent. If you can't come out at 19/20, then there is a talent deficit relative to other NBA players.
Same time, I believe the old developmental timeline is a bit outdated. It's years in the league, not age. Certainly body and mind maturation matters, but after 4 years in the NBA, you generally are who you are. Whether that's 22 or 26.
And you develop much better, in the aggregate, coming to the NBA earlier IMO. Some chicken/egg to that (if you're good enough to come out early etc).
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:38 am to Lester Earl
quote:
my point is that i dont think his athleticism will be a limiting factor. It is more of a skill thing, which can be improved.
oh i agree. if he makes that improvement he can be a 20 ppg guy for sure
i think we both agree it's not likely in year 1, but he can still put up even 15 ppg without it in year 1
having an 88% FT guy with some athleticism and a badass 3 makes me so hopeful that he can get some skills at driving b/c he can really do some damage with that outside-inside game if it develops. that's the ideal developmental arc
having a guy like AD pulling out bigs is the perfect setup for that
This post was edited on 7/4/16 at 10:39 am
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:41 am to SlowFlowPro
@WojVerticalNBA: Kevin Durant will sign with Golden State, he writes on the Players Tribune.
m.twitter.com/WojVerticalNBA
m.twitter.com/WojVerticalNBA
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:41 am to corndeaux
quote:
. It's years in the league, not age.
it's always been age and always will be age
biology makes it that way. it's just not easy to develop a body and create the same sort of developmental muscle memory past 23 or so. guys who make major body changes after that age often have severe sacrifices when they do that
then from 23-28 you find your athletic prime
by about 28, your body produces less testosterone and starts to break down so by 30 things get worrisome
unless you're lebron james
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:43 am to SlowFlowPro
I think, per usual, people are setting themselves up for disappointment.
Outliers occur, but the norm happens far more often because...well, it's the norm.
He will be a good player, but we all agree that he (like all rookies) will be a minus on the defensive end in year 1. Offensively, no non shot creator has put up significant points on a quality (40 or more wins) team in a long time
If he puts up the stats some of you are expecting, it is only because major injuries occurred. Personally, I think it will be better for him and for the team, if he had a quieter rookie year
Outliers occur, but the norm happens far more often because...well, it's the norm.
He will be a good player, but we all agree that he (like all rookies) will be a minus on the defensive end in year 1. Offensively, no non shot creator has put up significant points on a quality (40 or more wins) team in a long time
If he puts up the stats some of you are expecting, it is only because major injuries occurred. Personally, I think it will be better for him and for the team, if he had a quieter rookie year
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:43 am to BSB1988
quote:
His numbers were great this year in college but my thing is college basketball players are not as good today as they were when those guys were playing in college so his numbers are not equal to those guys because the level of talent he was going against compared to them
punctuation is your friend, buddy
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:45 am to Crewz
quote:
I think, per usual, people are setting themselves up for disappointment.
Outliers occur, but the norm happens far more often because...well, it's the norm.
then you're basically shitting on the draft pick
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:47 am to Crewz
quote:
people are setting themselves up for disappointment.
because we expect him to be better than Aderian Payne, Jerian Grant, Frank Kaminsky & Delon Wright as rookies?
I dont think many people expect his numbers to be much better than what you profiled. I think he'll be closer to 15ppg but that is almost splitting hairs.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News