Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

If Tyreke 3 point shooting holds up next season

Posted on 5/3/16 at 1:11 pm
Posted by 504ByrdGang
Member since Nov 2013
2495 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 1:11 pm
Would you still want him dealt barring the injury doesn't affect his game too much?
Posted by tigerbait44
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2012
112 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 1:30 pm to
yes.... holds the ball too much and kills the flow of the offense to fit in Gentry's system.
Posted by Pendulum
Member since Jan 2009
7040 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 1:47 pm to
Will he still average 16 seconds on the shot clock every time getting across halfcourt?
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30080 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 1:52 pm to
never been an efficient offensive player ever in his career. his ortg is bad, matches his bad team defense.

pass
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61435 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 2:13 pm to
If they know it's for real and they don't have plans for his cap space, I would consider holding onto him just to trade him. I still don't think he fits what Gentry wants to do, but if he's a legit 36%+ 3 point shooter then maybe he can get you something useful.
Posted by 504ByrdGang
Member since Nov 2013
2495 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 2:48 pm to
Biggest misconception he hold the ball a little bit less than most starting pgs
Posted by Solo
Member since Aug 2008
8234 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 3:03 pm to
He doesn't seem to fit Gentry's system. Definitely more of an ISO guy.

I think he'll be here next year, but that they will let him walk the year after.

I also think when we play him in the future he'll drop lines like 25-10-8-3 on us and that we will be pissed.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61435 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

I also think when we play him in the future he'll drop lines like 25-10-8-3 on us and that we will be pissed.


He's not a bad player, but I think my gifs of Frazier in the other thread illustrate exactly why he doesn't fit Gentry. Playing Montyball getting Tyreke in those same situations was good. Even if he didn't score you had more people crashing the offensive boards to clean up any misses. What Gentry and Erman are running doesn't hit the offensive glass as much, they dropped from 4th in OReb% to 26th. Injuries/lost season/yada yada it was a conscious decision to shift the priorty from offensive rebounding to transition defense. That makes what Tyreke does have less value to the team.

Yeah it sucks to consider dumping a good player when the talent level is already thin, but you can't succeed going halfway in these things. You either need to fire Gentry or commit to him, and committing to him makes Tyreke a square peg.
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

Would you still want him dealt barring the injury doesn't affect his game too much?



If everything else is held constant, yes, I would still trade him.

3 point shooting isnt the only thing that has made Evans problematic in this system.

If he can make the sort of transition few players have shown the ability to do at his age and go from a ball dominant, half court, iso player to a above average off the ball player that can effectively transition to part time on and off ball player and do it at a high level with respect to the system being played then sure.

But that is a huge gamble that I wouldn't want to risk if something for good value that is a clear fit or increases future flexibility was available.
Posted by 504ByrdGang
Member since Nov 2013
2495 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

He's not a bad player, but I think my gifs of Frazier
no one is paying attention to you comparing a legit NBA play to a guy who can't stay in the league.
Posted by Eman5805
West Bank
Member since Nov 2010
5098 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 4:23 pm to
I'm as big a Reke fan as you'll find. But he's not a good fit for an offense that requires players making smart plays and swinging the ball around. Tyreke needs the ball in transition and iso.

Let him find a home with Monty, if he ever makes his way back to coaching following the grieving period.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61435 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 4:31 pm to
If "no one" wasn't irrationally in love with Tyreke then maybe he'd realize that I wasn't comparing Frazier and Tyreke, I was comparing what Frazier did, make passes to teammates, to what Tyreke would have done in the same situation, take an opening and attack the basket. This offense is not set up for bully ball. A big part of the success that came with Tyreke running the offense last year was because of the way the team crashed the offensive boards. They don't do that under Gentry. I feel I've made some decent, reasonable arguements the past few weeks as to why Tyreke is a questionable fit at best for Gentry and all you have done is make childish responses like this one or point to how much Tyreke helped us win with Monty. Ignoring a problem doesn't make it not exist.
This post was edited on 5/3/16 at 4:33 pm
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 12:04 am to
quote:

I'm as big a Reke fan as you'll find. But he's not a good fit for an offense that requires players making smart plays and swinging the ball around. Tyreke needs the ball in transition and iso.

Let him find a home with Monty, if he ever makes his way back to coaching following the grieving period.



The ironic thing about that is Monty didn't like Reke at first. Possibly ever.

Monty through circumstance and Tyreke's hardheadedness dropped the idea of using him as super sub.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30080 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 8:09 am to
Monty had to cater his offense to Tyreke. He's not coachable because he simply won't change his offensive mindset and that becomes an issue because gentry won't change his offensive scheme. It is efficient when you have a ball handler who can run it properly.
Posted by Brunedog
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2014
6480 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 8:17 am to
Gordon and tyreke should both be traded
Posted by Pendulum
Member since Jan 2009
7040 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

Biggest misconception he hold the ball a little bit less than most starting pgs


I'm talking about time behind the half court line, is there a stat for that? Tyreke takes an eternity to take the ball up court. So many times I'm watching games and I look down to see if they could have a called a violation bc it seems like forever.
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

I'm talking about time behind the half court line, is there a stat for that? Tyreke takes an eternity to take the ball up court. So many times I'm watching games and I look down to see if they could have a called a violation bc it seems like forever.


Yeah its always been a major pet peeve of mine with him.

The idea of getting up and down the court with pace is in large part because you don't want the defense to get set. Tyreke walking the ball up gives the defense that time to shift their defenders to their optimal assignments and get set.

His transitional awareness is really bad IMO.

Posted by 504ByrdGang
Member since Nov 2013
2495 posts
Posted on 5/4/16 at 7:56 pm to
Which is funny because he use to primarily run the ball up court b4 Month ball
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram