Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

expiring contracts after next year

Posted on 4/6/16 at 2:17 pm
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38641 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 2:17 pm
jrue holiday $11MM
tyreke evens $10.2MM
alonzo gee $1.4MM (if he opts in next yr)
luke babbitt $1.2MM (if the team opts in next yr)

next year davis goes from $7MM to $20MM+

along with the big decisions this offseason, even bigger ones loom next season. its time to start thinking about whether or not holiday (and evans to a lesser extent) are the future, or there will be no future

any thoughts/comps on what holiday's next contract might look like?
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 2:18 pm
Posted by sma19
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2011
335 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 2:21 pm to
Yeah I'd really like to know more about how we could use cap space this summer to extend him if we can like Denver did with Gallo and Chandler. I don't really understand that
Posted by 504ByrdGang
Member since Nov 2013
2495 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 2:27 pm to
I agree if Jrue is part of the future he should be extended now. He said he still worries about His leg so maybe hes willing to take the garunteed money. Offer him a 16 mil per year deal with bonus for all star games.
Posted by 504ByrdGang
Member since Nov 2013
2495 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 2:27 pm to
I agree if Jrue is part of the future he should be extended now. He said he still worries about His leg so maybe hes willing to take the garunteed money. Offer him a 16 mil per year deal with bonus for all star games.
Posted by 504ByrdGang
Member since Nov 2013
2495 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 2:27 pm to
I agree if Jrue is part of the future he should be extended now. He said he still worries about His leg so maybe hes willing to take the garunteed money. Offer him a 16 mil per year deal with bonus for all star games.
Posted by oncealurker
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2013
5057 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 2:34 pm to
Triple post

I agree with everything you said though
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61438 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

Yeah I'd really like to know more about how we could use cap space this summer to extend him if we can like Denver did with Gallo and Chandler.


Here's an article from TBW on it. Technically it wouldn't be an extension because that is based on your last year's salary, but he could do a renegotiation. LINK I'm not sure if I like that strategy myself with the numbers they use. They compare him to a max salary. Is Jrue going to get a max deal with so much more talent in the 2017 FA class? I can see him getting $20 per, but the extension proposed pays more than that. Maybe I'm just being naive about Holiday's market value, but if we commit to him a year early when there are serious health concerns, I expect more significant savings.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 2:42 pm
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17438 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

but if we commit to him a year early when there are serious health concerns, I expect more significant savings.


Unless the health concerns are valid and you don't get anything for your money
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38641 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

if we commit to him a year early


that assumes holiday would consider an extension...
he'll be 27 yrs old when his contract expires, and if he has a 70- 80 game season next year, he'll have all the leverage

now if he misses 20 games its a whole different scenario
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61438 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:07 pm to
I think the concerns about his leg are valid enough that I doubt he gets a max on the open market where he's competing at the most saturated position in the league. 2017 won't be like this season where Mike Conley is good enough to be the PG headliner. 2017 FA PGs include Steph, Westbrook, CP3, Kyle Lowry, Jeff Teague, even Tyreke is competition.


Another downside of renegotiation, at least using TBW's numbers, is Jrue will be making over $22 million in 2017, rather than having a $17 million cap hold, that extra $5 million could be a big deal depending on how they plan to play FA this year and next.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25444 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:23 pm to
The thing that irritates me is that Jrue is not a max guy.


There should be maybe 20 max guys out there, maybe 20, not close to 40 like there is now.

Gordon Hayward, Parsons, DeRozen and Barnes are good players. Max players, they are not. I mean for god's sake, you should at least have to make an all-star team before you can even be up for a max contract, maybe two. That should be a rule. i wouldn't care if they said you had to make 1 all nba team to get a max contract. At least DeRozen has all-stars appearances.

Jrue makes an all star team once, in a weak east, then follows it up with 120 missed games over the next 3 years, and he deserves near a max contract b/c he might play well and be healthy for 1 year?

Owners need to nut up and quit giving money to players that don't deserve it. There should be more $12-14 million players out there. the ones that get max or near max money that have proven nothing to warrant max money, like Draymond Green.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38641 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

Owners need to nut up and quit giving money to players that don't deserve it. There should be more $12-14 million players out there. the ones that get max or near max money that have proven nothing to warrant max money, like Draymond Green.


you dont understand how the salary cap/revenue split works, do you? there is far, far , far more money that must be spent on players than there are players who "deserve" it
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38641 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

2017 FA PGs include Steph, Westbrook, CP3, Kyle Lowry, Jeff Teague, even Tyreke is competition


fair on lowry, teague, evans, etc
but westbrook, paul and curry arent changing teams. yes they'll be FA's but they almost assuredly wont be on the market

i think holiday (if he plays 70- 80 next year) would be at the head of the line
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61438 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

but westbrook, paul and curry arent changing teams.


Steph, yes. But if the Clippers and OKC both fail to get over the hump, I think it's far from certain that they stay put.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 3:38 pm
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34247 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

he thing that irritates me is that Jrue is not a max guy.


There should be maybe 20 max guys out there, maybe 20, not close to 40 like there is now.

Gordon Hayward, Parsons, DeRozen and Barnes are good players. Max players, they are not. I mean for god's sake, you should at least have to make an all-star team before you can even be up for a max contract, maybe two. That should be a rule. i wouldn't care if they said you had to make 1 all nba team to get a max contract. At least DeRozen has all-stars appearances.

Jrue makes an all star team once, in a weak east, then follows it up with 120 missed games over the next 3 years, and he deserves near a max contract b/c he might play well and be healthy for 1 year?

Owners need to nut up and quit giving money to players that don't deserve it. There should be more $12-14 million players out there. the ones that get max or near max money that have proven nothing to warrant max money, like Draymond Green.



I think you are getting way too caught up on the word max. Those guys are worth the max versus this cap. The issue is that there are at least a dozen players that deserve significantly more than the cap. Half the guys getting the "max" are not underpaid, the other half are significantly underpaid. You need to pay attention to the relative share rather than a fabricated "max."
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34247 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:46 pm to
Also, raising the max or doing away with it altogether is very good for competitive balance. Would the Heat or Cavs have been able to build their superstar rosters around Lebron if he was making $32m? Probably not. Ensuring that the stars can only get so much, that benefits the big markets. It allows them to offer the same amount. Hell, the Cavs may not have wanted to offer Lebron $35M, but the Wolves might have. The way it is set up now is basically a semi-regulated market.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34247 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 3:48 pm to
I really hope the players fight for the exceptions to rise/fall according to the cap.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram