- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A Danny Granger deal might make a lot of sense for this team.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 2:30 pm to Rev1897
Posted on 1/20/13 at 2:30 pm to Rev1897
The Hornets need to increase their talent level, not redistribute it. The only good trades for the Hornets would be if a guy is getting dumped, they are getting paid to facilitate a trade, or they can trade their draft pick for a young vet that fits well. They just don't have enough assets to trade for a good player without it being a 1 step forward 2 steps back move.
3
Posted on 1/20/13 at 2:34 pm to Rev1897
quote:I wouldn't bother responding to that guy.
Ehh, people need to lighten up on this board... Shockingly, you may not know everything there is to know about the NBA
Seriously, there's not a lot going on upstairs with him.
This post was edited on 1/20/13 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 1/20/13 at 2:39 pm to Rev1897
quote:
We don't really have any salaries that match, other than EG (which works straight up)
How does filling up a hole at SF by creating another hole at SG help us at all?
Posted on 1/20/13 at 2:58 pm to DJ3K
quote:
How does filling up a hole at SF by creating another hole at SG help us at all?
I agree with you... We'd have to plan to draft a SG or develop Rivers...:shudder:
Posted on 1/20/13 at 3:13 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
The Hornets need to increase their talent level, not redistribute it. The only good trades for the Hornets would be if a guy is getting dumped, they are getting paid to facilitate a trade, or they can trade their draft pick for a young vet that fits well. They just don't have enough assets to trade for a good player without it being a 1 step forward 2 steps back move.
Exactly
Posted on 1/20/13 at 3:21 pm to Rev1897
What about my post suggested I was saying anything about the NBA? Lol, I was simply responding to sir troll of hornets talk. The level of troll ness is pretty high then he tries to cover it up with showcasing his moderate-sub par knowledge of basketball and the NBA. But this thread is pretty bad as well.
This post was edited on 1/20/13 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 1/20/13 at 3:21 pm to danman6336
Poor lil danman6336 and his feelings.
This post was edited on 1/20/13 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 1/20/13 at 3:31 pm to JayJay2
lol, are you still stalking me?
that's cute
that's cute
Posted on 1/20/13 at 3:38 pm to Rev1897
I think his injury history is overblown, but he is an old 30 and giving up anything more than a player and our first would be too much. I don't see Monty giving up Rivers for anything, GV would leave us with a hole unless we made two deals, and Lopez is playing too well on a decent contract to give up.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 3:39 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
The Hornets need to increase their talent level, not redistribute it. The only good trades for the Hornets would be if a guy is getting dumped, they are getting paid to facilitate a trade, or they can trade their draft pick for a young vet that fits well. They just don't have enough assets to trade for a good player without it being a 1 step forward 2 steps back move.
Once again Tiger nails it.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:12 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
The Hornets need to increase their talent level, not redistribute it. The only good trades for the Hornets would be if a guy is getting dumped, they are getting paid to facilitate a trade, or they can trade their draft pick for a young vet that fits well. They just don't have enough assets to trade for a good player without it being a 1 step forward 2 steps back move.
Logical answer. Agree that you may be right, but I think that the only "young vets" really worth our pick aren't going to move, since the contracts post CBA are so cap-friendly.
A pre-CBA contract like Granger's (or Rudy Gay's) is a cancer on a team like Indiana. For us, it could be an opportunity to get a quality player who is slightly (but not comically) overpaid. That's all I was saying.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:19 pm to Rev1897
1) Sign Josh Smith
2) Play him at the 3
3) ???
4) Profit
2) Play him at the 3
3) ???
4) Profit
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:22 pm to Rev1897
quote:
Logical answer. Agree that you may be right, but I think that the only "young vets" really worth our pick aren't going to move, since the contracts post CBA are so cap-friendly.
A pre-CBA contract like Granger's (or Rudy Gay's) is a cancer on a team like Indiana. For us, it could be an opportunity to get a quality player who is slightly (but not comically) overpaid. That's all I was saying.
But we still don't have the pieces to make the trade. I can't see any situation where we can make a trade to get a solid SF that isn't just a lateral trade because we'll leave ourselves in the same situation just at a different position. If we had a better backup for Vazquez or Lopez I'd be more willing to send one of them in a trade, but sending them away just leaves us with no PG or C, so having a SF does nothing for us.
Might as well wait it out and see what happens in FA and the draft
This post was edited on 1/20/13 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 1/20/13 at 4:34 pm to Cap Crunch
Yeah, the cap space we have next year is valuable for trades with teams trying to clear space without taking salary back. No reason to make a trade for a guy like Granger this season.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 5:00 pm to Broski
quote:
Sign Josh Smith
Not opposed to this. We would have to overpay him comically, though.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 5:07 pm to Cap Crunch
quote:
You think Lopez Henry and rivers is enough? Hard to see Monty trading Rivers too.
How does filling up a hole at SF by creating another hole at C help us at all?
Vazquez
Gordon
Granger
Anderson
Davis
Bench:
Roberts
Mason
Aminu
Thomas
Smith
Miller
sign some d-league big men/pg for depth.
Andrew Goudelock
Brian Butch
Tim Ohlbrecht
This post was edited on 1/20/13 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 1/20/13 at 5:11 pm to PokerChamp21
quote:
Vazquez
Gordon
Granger
Anderson
Davis
Bench:
Roberts
Mason
Aminu
Thomas
Smith
Miller
That team is no better than what we have now. In fact, you made out bench even worse.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 5:12 pm to Broski
Starting 5
Vasquez
Gordon
Smith
Davis
Lopez
Crunchtime
Vasquez
Gordon
Anderson
Smith
Davis
Posted on 1/20/13 at 5:17 pm to PokerChamp21
I don't mind Davis at the 5, but he's to versatile to play C all the time. He's better as a PF and that is where he should get most of his minutes. Plus, I'm really starting to like Lopez
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News