Started By
Message

re: Pete Townshend vs. Keith Richards

Posted on 8/23/16 at 10:46 pm to
Posted by vandelay industries
CSRA
Member since May 2012
2477 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 10:46 pm to
While my personal preference is Pete, Keith is very underrated IMO. He has great chemistry when he jams with other musicians, and his "burnout" reputation overshadows his skills as a guitarist. There's not alot of footage of him playing in his Netflix doc, but there's just enough where you should be able to see he's more than capable with his instrument...

Again, I lean towards Pete, but his best days were with the original Who lineup, which was tailor-made for his style...once Keith died, so did a little bit of Pete.
Posted by tybeebomb
State of Chatham
Member since Jul 2014
1012 posts
Posted on 8/24/16 at 6:15 am to
Page ? Nope. JP was a session man for years before Pete even strapped on a les Paul.
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 8/24/16 at 7:54 am to
And during that time period, did Jimmy Page do anything to further the sonic capabilities or revolutionize the electric guitar? No, he primarily played rhythm guitar on hundreds or thousands of sessions in London.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89450 posts
Posted on 8/24/16 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Not to mention seminal for prog rock: he wrote A Quick One While He's Away, the Tommy and Quadrophenia albums, hell Baba O'Riley was a massive contribution of itself.


No question that The Who (along with Pink Floyd and, to a degree, The Hollies)) were the lead in/starting point for a lot of progressive rock of the 1970s - and there is also no questioning that The Who's attitude and Pete's guitar technique inspired and informed a lot of punk. In the context of this thread, the irony shouldn't be lost that punk rock was all about attitude and musical ability *cough* Sex Pistols *cough* was "optional" in the genre (with all due respect to The Clash, who were fantastic musicians).
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50245 posts
Posted on 8/24/16 at 9:59 am to
quote:

And during that time period, did Jimmy Page do anything to further the sonic capabilities or revolutionize the electric guitar? No, he primarily played rhythm guitar on hundreds or thousands of sessions in London.

Uh, that´s his trademark solo on Donovan´s Hurdy Gurdy Man.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89450 posts
Posted on 8/24/16 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Uh, that´s his trademark solo on Donovan´s Hurdy Gurdy Man.


While I applaud his efforts in praising Pete Townshend (I'm certainly a fan), his bias in slamming Page's ability is palpable. Call Jimmy Page a thief? There's plenty of support for that. Say he made a habit of showing up stoned and/or with out of tune guitars for more than a handful of high profile live performances? Guilty as charged.

But, to deny that he was a great, innovative and influential lead guitar player - in the argument for GOAT in that category (despite, again, not quite the technical skill of some of his peers, but I would say that, technically, Page was better than Townshend or Richards, to keep it on point with this thread) is just hipster snobbishness, trying too hard to be cool and edgy (IMHO).
This post was edited on 8/24/16 at 10:06 am
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 8/24/16 at 10:08 am to
Yeah, that solo was essentially a carbon copy of Pete's power chording.
Posted by vandelay industries
CSRA
Member since May 2012
2477 posts
Posted on 8/24/16 at 10:15 am to
In terms of Led Zeppelin's concerts, I think most reasonable fans tolerated some bum notes or sloppy passages from Page (it kinda goes with the territory of largely improvised performance), because when he & the band reached those transcendent moments they were striving for in a live performance, the trade-off was oh so worth it...the audiences' philosophy was not unlike the Dead's: you'll tolerate the occasional lows in exchange for the blissful highs, especially since most bands couldn't achieve those moments no matter how hard they tried.
This post was edited on 8/24/16 at 10:17 am
Posted by tidalmouse
Whatsamotta U.
Member since Jan 2009
30706 posts
Posted on 8/24/16 at 11:54 am to
Pete

Proof that The Who is the greatest Rock Band in the World
This post was edited on 8/24/16 at 11:57 am
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 8/24/16 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

but I think Townshend´s biggest contribution is being quite seminal for punk.


I love the Who, but Townshend is not very seminal for punk. John Cale is probably the seminal proto-punk guitarist while Johnny Thunders is the seminal punk rock guitarist. Townshend had far more influence over prog and the mods.

Actually, the classic rock guitarist that most punks I know liked the most is Steve Howe of Yes. Which is weird as hell, but there you go. I'm one of thousands of 80s punks who has The Yes Album right next to X's first two releases in my record collection.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89450 posts
Posted on 8/24/16 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

I love the Who, but Townshend is not very seminal for punk.


Meh. I agree in part and disagree in part. Punk largely drew its entire vibe from the way The Who put on a live show - loud, distortion, hyperkinetic, destructive - that defined what punk sought to project as attitude replacing musicality (by design).

While Pete, personally, may not have been directly influential on the punk sound, certainly indirectly, as the guitarist for The Who, he did inform and influence the English and American punk bands that followed. I tend to agree with Howe as being the traditional rock guitar player that the punk players looked up to as an individual musician.
Posted by HeadyBrosevelt
the Verde River
Member since Jan 2013
21590 posts
Posted on 8/24/16 at 12:42 pm to
Richards never sniffed Townshend's stuff on Live at Leeds. I will give Keef credit for the slide outro solo to "Monkey Man", A+ stuff right there.
This post was edited on 8/24/16 at 12:44 pm
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 8/24/16 at 12:48 pm to
I will grant you loud and destructive, though I think the Who were always grandiose and larger than life, which is an anathema to punk, which believed in no separation between the artist and the audience. Actually, Keith fits in pretty well with the punk aesthetic as he is perhaps the only great guitar god who just plays the fricking riff. Keef's simplicity is a guiding light for punk rock guitarists.

Though the Steve Howe thing is weird, right?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89450 posts
Posted on 8/24/16 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Though the Steve Howe thing is weird, right?


Weird, but not that weird. Yes was pretty big in and around London before they broke internationally. Howe could play anything and Yes was fairly experimental in the late 60s and early 70s. It makes sense that "different" kids (i.e. those who ended up in punk bands by the early/mid-70s) would have latched onto someone like Steve Howe.

Why not him?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram