- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How do you think a group feels when products uses a cover to promote product?
Posted on 10/9/16 at 8:01 am
Posted on 10/9/16 at 8:01 am
Video game coming out
Main song is a cover of Metallica ' s Nothing Else Matters
You think that pissed them off, or it actually is a compliment to the song's more well-rounded nature?
Main song is a cover of Metallica ' s Nothing Else Matters
You think that pissed them off, or it actually is a compliment to the song's more well-rounded nature?
3
Posted on 10/9/16 at 8:36 am to Rouge
I assume they feel richer?
No way cover or not, those guys don't get some $$$ ?
No way cover or not, those guys don't get some $$$ ?
Posted on 10/9/16 at 8:43 am to LSU alum wannabe
No doubt
I am referring more to ego
I am referring more to ego
Posted on 10/9/16 at 9:31 am to Rouge
They're in the business to make money.They get paid for that stuff. I don't know for sure,but I think their publishing company has a right to allow,or refuse usage. Everybody likes money right?
Posted on 10/9/16 at 9:41 am to Rouge
quote:
You think that pissed them off, or it actually is a compliment to the song's more well-rounded nature?
probably not, because they would have to sign off on it...
Like when REM told Microsoft no (It's the end of the world...) for Windows 95 campaign... Rolling Stones said yes (start me up)..
I think it pisses them off more when used by politicians..
Posted on 10/9/16 at 10:02 am to TFTC
quote:
probably not, because they would have to sign off on it... Like when REM told Microsoft no (It's the end of the world...) for Windows 95 campaign... Rolling Stones said yes (start me up)..
True. Note, the Stones own none of their catalog - recorded or publishing - from '62 to '70: Satisfaction, Jumping Jack Flash, Sympathy, Paint It Black, You Can't Always Get...., etc. Anytime you hear one of those used, Allen Klein and family get richer. Damn shame.
This post was edited on 10/9/16 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 10/9/16 at 7:14 pm to Chitter Chatter
quote:I beleive they were paid $12M for that
Windows 95 campaign... Rolling Stones said yes (start me up)
quote:Klein owns the publishing, but Jagger and Richards still own their songwriting rights, correct? So they would get royalties -- they just don't control how or when the usage rights are sold
Note, the Stones own none of their catalog - recorded or publishing - from '62 to '70: Satisfaction, Jumping Jack Flash, Sympathy, Paint It Black, You Can't Always Get...., etc. Anytime you hear one of those used, Allen Klein and family get richer. Damn shame
Posted on 10/9/16 at 8:39 pm to Kafka
They get something but I do not believe they have any say in what gets used or not. That's why Jagger in '70 went to such lengths and legal work to completely control everything from that point forward. The only thing they on Sticky Fingers they don't control are the publishing for Brown Sugar and Wild Horses as they were recorded in '69. I think they split control of the masters. Once they got burned, Jagger swore they never would again. Good thing he went to the London school of economics.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 9:55 pm to Chitter Chatter
"$25 million dollars worth of experience" -- Keith Richards on the Stones' time with Allen Klein
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News