- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why CG Sucks (except it doesn't)
Posted on 8/4/15 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 8/4/15 at 8:55 pm
LINK
quote:
Are computer generated visual effects really ruining movies?
We believe that the reason we think all CG looks bad, is because we only see "bad” CG. Fantastic, beautiful, and wonderfully executed CG is everywhere - you just don't know it. Truly great visual effects serve story and character – and in doing so are, by their very definition, invisible.
1
Posted on 8/4/15 at 9:22 pm to hawgfaninc
that makes some valid points. I was surprised by some of static landscapes that were CGI.
It's getting better, in Ant Man I was thrown off a bit by Michael Douglas. I know what he used to look like, but not so certain about now; and in watching, I wasn't sure if that was makeup to make him look older, younger, or what. I've since read that he looks like the old-guy scenes, and they CGI'd him to make him look younger.
It's getting better, in Ant Man I was thrown off a bit by Michael Douglas. I know what he used to look like, but not so certain about now; and in watching, I wasn't sure if that was makeup to make him look older, younger, or what. I've since read that he looks like the old-guy scenes, and they CGI'd him to make him look younger.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News