- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
the Pacific
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:02 am
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:02 am
So...I was a Huge fan of Band of Brothers...but I have been putting off watching The Pacific for about 5 years now...I finally broke down and watched episode 1. I wasn't that impressed at first...I had trouble identifying with the characters initially...but holy crap, that first fire fight was incredible and after that, I'm in. I'm planning on watching the rest of it. For those of you who have watched both, how would you compare Band of Brothers to The Pacific?
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:07 am to madmaxvol
Much more about the negative aspects of the war and how brutal the fighting there was.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:08 am to madmaxvol
As a marine, I hold that show in much higher regard. But they couldn't really shoot the gruesomeness of what was said in the books it was based off of. Wait for the battle of Pelelieu and Okinawa. They did a really good job on those.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:15 am to TigerFanInSouthland
The Pacific is really good, but you have to get out of the mindset of comparing it to BoB. If you compare it to that, it will pale in comparison. Judge it for what it is and you'll be satisfied. I liked Generation Kill but it falls into that same trap of being compared to BoB for whatever reason.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:16 am to leoj
quote:
Much more about the negative aspects of the war and how brutal the fighting there was.
This. It purposefully didn't let you into the characters like Band of Brothers. It was based off 3 not the entire company like BoB. It's still good, I prefer BoB because each character was so charismatic.
The Pacfiic was ultra realistic though
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:19 am to WicKed WayZ
quote:
This. It purposefully didn't let you into the characters like Band of Brothers. It was based off 3 not the entire company like BoB.
It's also based off of 2 different autobiographies, so the story shifts focus/perspective about halfway through.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:35 am to saintkenn
quote:
The Pacific is really good, but you have to get out of the mindset of comparing it to BoB. If you compare it to that, it will pale in comparison.
Exactly this.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 9:44 am to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
But they couldn't really shoot the gruesomeness of what was said in the books it was based off of. Wait for the battle of Pelelieu and Okinawa.
My father was a Marine, and was stationed in Okinawa between Korea and Vietnam. He talked about how isolated the island was, and the terrain. I can't wait to see how they show those battles.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 10:36 am to leoj
quote:
Much more about the negative aspects of the war and how brutal the fighting there was.
This exactly. BoB is much more focused on some amazing individuals. The Pacific is much more brutal with its war scenes and focuses on how fricked up the soldiers become.
My only complaint about The Pacific is their seems to be some filler episodes that just connect the dots. Which I guess wouldn't make them "filler", but I think after you see them you'll know what I mean.
This post was edited on 6/23/16 at 10:38 am
Posted on 6/23/16 at 10:56 am to madmaxvol
Those young Marines had balls of steel. That airfield scene is one of the most intense things I have ever watched.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 11:01 am to alajones
quote:
My only complaint about The Pacific is their seems to be some filler episodes that just connect the dots.
The Australia episode didn't need to happen.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 11:15 am to madmaxvol
Is this on Netflix or Amazon?
Posted on 6/23/16 at 11:22 am to madmaxvol
Band of Brothers was GOAT (rivaled only by Lonesome Dove for me).
Pacific is not quite to that level. They tried to mesh 3 vastly different stories to make 1 coherent whole but the Pacific war did not really lend itself to that.
I've always said that they could maybe have tied the Leckie and Sledge stories together by making Sid Phillips the primary character. And they could have make a great stand alone movie out of the Basilone stuff. But they didn't go that route.
I do very highly recommend the excellent source books for the Leckie and Sledge stories:
Robert Leckie - Helmet for My Pillow
Eugene Sledge - With the Old Breed
Two books by two very different Marines but both well written and both great reads.
Pacific is not quite to that level. They tried to mesh 3 vastly different stories to make 1 coherent whole but the Pacific war did not really lend itself to that.
I've always said that they could maybe have tied the Leckie and Sledge stories together by making Sid Phillips the primary character. And they could have make a great stand alone movie out of the Basilone stuff. But they didn't go that route.
I do very highly recommend the excellent source books for the Leckie and Sledge stories:
Robert Leckie - Helmet for My Pillow
Eugene Sledge - With the Old Breed
Two books by two very different Marines but both well written and both great reads.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 11:53 am to saintkenn
quote:Generation Kill was great, but it was a great book first right? I read the book and it was incredible. And I feel like the mood of the book translated well to the screen for HBO. They did a great job with that series.
I liked Generation Kill but it falls into that same trap of being compared to BoB for whatever reason.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 1:51 pm to Methuselah
quote:
Band of Brothers was GOAT
Band of Brothers was the best thing that I have ever seen on TV. I remember watching it in my hotel room in Wales in December of '01. After September 11th, and traveling overseas...there was something about it that emotionally elicited so much from me. It was incredible.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 2:05 pm to Jester
quote:
The Australia episode didn't need to happen.
Uhhhhh...titties
Posted on 6/23/16 at 2:07 pm to Azazello
quote:
young Marines had balls of steel. That airfield scene is one of the most intense things I have ever watched.
I've read a few books on Pelelieu, they really did run out of water within the first couple hours of the assault. That's how hot that shithole was.
In my mind it was the biggest waste of a battle in American military history. Didn't even use the airfield once.
This post was edited on 6/23/16 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 6/23/16 at 2:41 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
I've read a few books on Pelelieu, they really did run out of water within the first couple hours of the assault. That's how hot that shithole was.
In my mind it was the biggest waste of a battle in American military history. Didn't even use the airfield once.
I've been reading Goodbye, Darkness, and Manchester covers some of this. It was practically an oversight on the part of Nimitz and JCS (who were in Canada meeting with Allied counterparts) that led to them invading Peleliu at all - almost as if some staff officer just totally forgot to relay that they needn't take it. Tragic all around.
That said, it gave us my favorite amphibious landing scene in all of cinema.
Posted on 6/23/16 at 4:00 pm to madmaxvol
Band of Brothers is on a level all its own. It is the Alpha and Omega.
Generation Kill is not on that level, but is underrated and was - relative to Band of Brothers - unheralded as well, so it never had much hype. For good or bad. No one built it up on a pedestal for us, so we are free to take it as it is. I liked Generation Kill a whole lot more than The Pacific.
The Pacific was hyped to the moon, directly sold as 'the Band of Brothers of the other theater', and then both by its own virtue falling short of Band of Brothers' total excellence, and because it was pitched as the second coming of that excellence, but wasn't, it received probably more criticism than it deserved; however, it does deserve some criticism. It's very uneven, lacks Band of Brothers' focus and flow because it is a splicing of like 3 different stories, and has a whole episode that is a totally unnecessary, boring waste.
It's not terrible, but put it this way: if The Pacific came first, they would never have made Band of Brothers, because The Pacific would essentially have been relegated to the same place in TV history as Generation Kills - loved by a cult following, generally well received, but not some transformative phenomenon - and nobody would be clamoring for another.
In some ways, The Pacific is a better version of True Detective Season 2. All the "magic" you loved about the first installment is absent, it's not tight, and you don't get into the characters. It's not terrible like True Detective Season 2, but the palpable absence of the greatness you experienced in Band of Brothers magnifies the faults of The Pacific beyond how actually just "meh" it is to the point that you want to angrily shout 'this sucks!' even though it doesn't really totally suck.
Generation Kill is not on that level, but is underrated and was - relative to Band of Brothers - unheralded as well, so it never had much hype. For good or bad. No one built it up on a pedestal for us, so we are free to take it as it is. I liked Generation Kill a whole lot more than The Pacific.
The Pacific was hyped to the moon, directly sold as 'the Band of Brothers of the other theater', and then both by its own virtue falling short of Band of Brothers' total excellence, and because it was pitched as the second coming of that excellence, but wasn't, it received probably more criticism than it deserved; however, it does deserve some criticism. It's very uneven, lacks Band of Brothers' focus and flow because it is a splicing of like 3 different stories, and has a whole episode that is a totally unnecessary, boring waste.
It's not terrible, but put it this way: if The Pacific came first, they would never have made Band of Brothers, because The Pacific would essentially have been relegated to the same place in TV history as Generation Kills - loved by a cult following, generally well received, but not some transformative phenomenon - and nobody would be clamoring for another.
In some ways, The Pacific is a better version of True Detective Season 2. All the "magic" you loved about the first installment is absent, it's not tight, and you don't get into the characters. It's not terrible like True Detective Season 2, but the palpable absence of the greatness you experienced in Band of Brothers magnifies the faults of The Pacific beyond how actually just "meh" it is to the point that you want to angrily shout 'this sucks!' even though it doesn't really totally suck.
This post was edited on 6/23/16 at 4:12 pm
Posted on 6/23/16 at 4:52 pm to Cooter Davenport
I haven't watched The Pacific since it aired and I made the mistake of expecting another BoB. It isn't, but I feel after watching the first episode it's better than I thought it was.
GK is nowhere near BoB or The Pacific. GK felt like a chore and I was just glad to get through it
GK is nowhere near BoB or The Pacific. GK felt like a chore and I was just glad to get through it
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News