Started By
Message

re: Terminator Genisys starts off at 33% and 5.4/10 on Rotten Tomatoes

Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:43 pm to
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71473 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

How the hell do they frick this shite up?

Make the Terminator come back and protect Sarah her whole life. Make John switch sides.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89463 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:46 pm to
Yeah - glad to know my instincts are good and Cameron is full of shite.
Posted by Rebel Land Shark
Member since Jul 2013
30162 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:59 pm to
Terminator just like Die Hard has gone from really good to really bad
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 11:45 pm to
I'll still watch no doubt
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15761 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:17 am to
No way it can be as bad as T3
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77547 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:22 am to
What issue do you have with RT? They don't review the movies.
Posted by red_giraffe
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2012
1045 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:32 am to
A lot of people put too much weight on RT scores. They aren't the end-all be-all of movie rating sites but that's often where people go to first to quote a movie's rating. There's other places that are considered more "reliable" (I guess that's the best word?), such as metacritic.com. But I also wouldn't treat that as the end-all be-all of movie rating sites either.

But if anyone is interested in the metascore... it's a 38 right now. LINK

Edit: imdb user rating has it listed at 7.8
This post was edited on 6/26/15 at 7:34 am
Posted by red_giraffe
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2012
1045 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:39 am to
Additionally, if the score on metacritic is at 38 and RT has a score of 17%, then the movie is probably shite.

I just don't understand: if the previous movies in a franchise sucked bad enough to prompt a reboot, then why the frak would a studio not go all out and make damn sure that the reboot is a commercial and critical success? At least Disney seemed to have made the right decision to get Kasdan to write star wars, and Abrams/Johnson as directors.

^^Pretty sure someone will blast me for that last sentence.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77547 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:40 am to
I guess I always assumed that it was the best place to go because it was taking a collection of other people's reviews, not reviewing it themselves. Is it because of the reviews it actually pulls from?
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77547 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:41 am to
I don't understand why they have to keep bringing Arnold back. Are we saying the franchise can't live without him?
Posted by red_giraffe
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2012
1045 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:47 am to
The people I've talked to who don't like RT, state that it has a lot of reviews from respected critics, but anyone can basically create a review for a movie on that site and have it affect the score. Essentially, you could have some people with really shitty tastes in movies bloating the score for a film.

The flip side of that argument is that sometimes the major critics (like the ones on metacritic) aren't always great judges of film either. I usually like to take both scores into account. But with the price of movies these days, if it's not at least a 70 I'm not taking time to see it.
Posted by red_giraffe
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2012
1045 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:51 am to
Good question. My guess is that he's basically going to bring the viewers.
Posted by SG_Geaux
1 Post
Member since Aug 2004
77923 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:53 am to
Don't care. Will watch.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112195 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 8:02 am to
quote:

What issue do you have with RT? They don't review the movies.


How did you get that out of what I said?

I just don't decide on whether I want or will see a movie based on RT. I think it's kind of dumb whenever I see someone excited to see a movie and then it gets a shitty RT score and they go "AWW DAMN I GUESS IT SUCKS AND I WONT GO SEE IT".
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79936 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 8:46 am to
Anything below a 40 on metacritic is likely terrible.

Anything above a 60 on metacritic is usually worth seeing.
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28799 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Additionally, if the score on metacritic is at 38 and RT has a score of 17%, then the movie is probably shite.



spot on.


i've seen some good movies that had a low RT score and that had a low metacritic score. but usually not when they both are low.


interesting list where RT misses the mark
This post was edited on 6/26/15 at 9:03 am
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84823 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 9:03 am to
quote:

you have with RT? They don't review the movies.


Well if every reviewer gives a movie 3/5, it will show up on RT as 100%. So it can be a misleading metric for sure.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89463 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Are we saying the franchise can't live without him?


Probably - and FTR, Arnold is pushing 70. It was a good run, but he's going to have to be in grandfatherly roles from now on.
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
18551 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 9:40 am to
You lost all credibility when you said metacritic.
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
36200 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 9:41 am to
17% seems a little high to me.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram