Started By
Message

Spectre > Skyfall

Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:43 pm
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
20758 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:43 pm
I know we had a thread earlier discussing how it was barely better than QoS, but I thought it was a really good Bond movie. It wasn't over the top like Brosnan's movies but it also wasn't some Bourne wannabe either. A little rough around the edges at times but it is better start to finish than Skyfall IMO. No stupid boogie-trapped house at the end. It also sets up well for future movies.

The title song is God awful though. Might be the worst one of any Bond movie.
This post was edited on 11/6/15 at 11:12 pm
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 10:57 pm to
I literally just finished Skyfall. I've been watching a Craig Bond film each week until I see Spectre next weekend.

Frankly, while QOS is clearly a step down from Casino and Skyfall, it's a solid film within the universe (I own every film).

Although I'm admittedly biased as I thoroughly enjoy every Bond film, I don't understand some criticisms in the reviews I've read. Some seem to criticize the fact that it's too "old school Bond" and it's using "old themes and ideas." On the other hand, the previous Craig films have gotten criticized for the complete opposite.

Regardless, I'm excited for another Bond film and glad to see that others have enjoyed it.
Posted by AubieALUMdvm
Member since Oct 2011
11713 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 11:06 pm to
Just got home from this. Really Enjoyed it overall though slightly slower to develop. Set up for future bond films very well
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76173 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 11:12 pm to
I liked it. Seemed like a solid Bond movie.
quote:

The title song is God awful though. Might be the worst one of any Bond movie.

True
Posted by gorillacoco
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2009
5318 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 11:21 pm to
I thought the uber villain was a little overplayed (and a little out of left field, never having been mentioned before) but overall I liked it.

Question: how is it set up well for moving forward? Seems like any villain after this one is going to kind of be a let down.
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
20758 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 11:28 pm to
quote:

Question: how is it set up well for moving forward? Seems like any villain after this one is going to kind of be a let down.


******SPOILERS************SPOILERS************SPOILERS******






















Blofeld wasn't killed. He was simply arrested and now he's got the scar. Don't think he'd live out the rest of his life in jail cell. They aren't going to use him for just one movie.

Also, Bond quit to be with Madeleine. He has to have a reason to come back. $5 says she is killed in the next movie similar to Tracy in OHMSS.
This post was edited on 11/6/15 at 11:34 pm
Posted by BradPitt
Where the wild things are
Member since Nov 2009
13389 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 11:34 pm to
I enjoyed Spectre , but the movie certainly had it's obvious flaws. You could tell it was rushed, despite being the longest Bond film ever. It was obvious in so many scenes as it felt a little choppy. To the post production team's credit, they were given hardly any time from the wrap date to the premiere and it clearly showed.

I had my hopes up going into this film because the leaked script I read was the "perfect" Bond movie. But so much was eliminated and so much was rewritten that shouldn't have been.

Additionally, several of Bond's Bond-ish one liners were also eliminated. Not to mention Thomas Newman's embarrassingly bad score ruined so many scenes for me. People fail to realize just how powerful a film a score is and it has the power to make or break a scene. Newman's score belonged in a Disney or Men in Black film, not a Bond.

I honestly feel had they been granted more time in post, the movie would've been a lot better. I still prefer the original script to the final cut.
Posted by AlbertMeansWell
Member since Sep 2013
5555 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 11:36 pm to
I saw it tonight too.

I'm a huge Bond fan and I'm usually pretty hard on movies in general..

With that being said, I absolutely loved the film. I don't get the criticism out there. I'm going to go see it again Sunday.
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
20758 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

People fail to realize just how powerful a film a score is and it has the power to make or break a scene.


Agree. That said, I love how they didn't have any music for the train fight. It was perfect and very raw. A throwback to Connery's fight in From Russia With Love.
Posted by Team Vote
DFW
Member since Aug 2014
7730 posts
Posted on 11/6/15 at 11:59 pm to
I loved how much the film referenced earlier Bond movies. It was solid. I don't appreciate Blofeld and SPECTRE being the result of daddy issues, I think it's cheap. And the score was terrible, that shite belonged in National Treasure or something. I enjoyed it though and will definitely get the Blu Ray
Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
20475 posts
Posted on 11/7/15 at 5:24 am to
Could not disagree more. It was quite underwhelming and on par with quantum of solace. Nowhere near the movie that skyfall was. IMHO.


Skyfall
Casino Royale

Spectre
Quantum of Solace
This post was edited on 11/7/15 at 5:27 am
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51893 posts
Posted on 11/7/15 at 6:41 am to
SPOILERS

I liked it but I think Waltz was underutilized.

I don't mind the family connection at all, but I felt that maybe a little more organic reveal would have been better than an exposition fest. For those that say it is absurd, I think that it helps to think of Culkin's character in the Good Son as a prelude. It wasn't that it turned a good guy bad out of jealousy. It just kicked already present sociopathic tendencies into overdrive.

But I do mind the hamfisted way the movies connected. It doesn't magically add depth to the story to have a villian to say "it was all me," without plot points from the past movies or the current to back it up or to illustrate the connection. Bringing back White helps a lot, but it is still just a character talking. You could replace him with just being a random ex-Spectre character and the story still works.

Something also felt off about Blofield's sinister menace as a villian. Under no circumstances did I even suspect that Blofield was dead after the complex explosion. I felt that he was a threat because the writer's wanted him to be, so he will magically get upper hands as needed. Compare to Silva who really came across as a genius mastermind who was only taken down when he allowed personal issues to goad him into an obvious trap. And even then, Bond's victory was a very narrow margin and a pyrrhic one at that.

Seriously, how much of Blofield's menace actually came from his words and actions, and how much came from the character's introduction where he was in shadows due to a camera trick, spoke very quietly and singly in a manner he doesn't follow again in the movie, and it was made clear that other characters feared him.



One thing I'll give the movie major props though is that they made it clear that the twist of C's treachery wasn't being considered a twist at all by the characters. By the time it was obvious to the audience, the characters were also speaking and acting that it was obvious to them too.
This post was edited on 11/7/15 at 6:42 am
Posted by Team Vote
DFW
Member since Aug 2014
7730 posts
Posted on 11/7/15 at 7:04 am to
quote:

One thing I'll give the movie major props though is that they made it clear that the twist of C's treachery wasn't being considered a twist at all by the characters. By the time it was obvious to the audience, the characters were also speaking and acting that it was obvious to them too.

This

Also, out of all the allusions to old bond movies, my favorite by far was the SPECTRE meeting. There is just something about a bunch of evil dudes sitting at a table.
This post was edited on 11/7/15 at 8:37 am
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
20758 posts
Posted on 11/7/15 at 7:24 am to
quote:

Nowhere near the movie that skyfall was. IMHO.


I'm a huge Bond fan and thought Skyfall was overrated. The third act is a mess and Silva's plan is a ripoff from The Joker in TDK and is actually a stupid plan to begin with. SPECTRE felt a lot more like a classic Bond movie to me. It wasn't some gritty personal introspective where Bond tries to find himself. In this movie, he is fully formed.

It's not as good as Casino Royale but I enjoyed it a lot more than Skyfall.

Here's a review that sort sums up my thoughts: LINK

quote:

I really want to drive home the point that this is not Skyfall 2. And that is a very very good thing! Finally, after three brooding films and nine years of depressing Bond stories we get something that manages to complement the series perfectly - it’s almost unbelievable how successfully rounded this film is in terms of it’s callbacks to both Craig’s era and before - in a fun and entertaining manner without diving too far into pastiche or ridiculousness.


quote:

SPECTRE is a movie about threading the Bond series. Many other reviewers are writing about how it feels like it’s come full circle, back to the camp-ness of the series before Craig’s era, and how it feels like a step backwards. To me, it’s exactly what it needs to be. It’s a very fun movie. Yes, it throws in some emotional moments, but doesn’t dwell on them. As I said, it’s made very clear early in the film that both Bond and main-Bond-girl Madeleine Swann’s character wounds have healed, and they’ve moved on. The balance between Sam Mendes drama and rompy Bond flick is level.


quote:

I think the issue most of the reviews I read are facing is that they’ve seen the previous three Criag films, they see that Sam Mendes is directing this, they see the marketing of the film selling it as some sort of character drama, and then the movie delivers something that takes it’s time (no pacing issues, as far as I’m concerned), has a laugh, and doesn’t complicate the plot. It has the looks of an Oscar winner with the material of the best-of-the-best James Bond stories. You haven’t even seen the second half of the film in the trailers!


Here's a piece of trivia that's also a spoiler: On Her Majsety's Secret Service was intended to end with Bond & Tracy riding off after the wedding. Tracy's death scene was shot but wasn't supposed to be included until the next film. Something to think about with how SPECTRE ended.

This post was edited on 11/7/15 at 9:21 am
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76173 posts
Posted on 11/7/15 at 8:17 am to
I agree with you about Waltz.
Posted by jackwoods4
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 11/7/15 at 10:46 am to
*Spoilers*







Overall I enjoyed. Script and score were a bit of a letdown. Didn't use Waltz as much as I would've liked. Very hopeful he'll return in the next movie or the one after. Would be weird if they brought him for one movie and barely had him in said movie. I felt like C was a bad character, rolled my eyes every time I had to see him, just wanted them to cut back to Bond. Bautista was great as the villain who just continues to show up against all odds and cause mayhem. Action was well done and entertaining. Hoyte Van Hoytema's camerawork was wonderful.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51893 posts
Posted on 11/7/15 at 10:57 am to
In the snarkoff with "M for moron" and "C for careless," I would have given them huge props if he said something to the effect of "C for clear cliche"
Posted by HandGrenade
Member since Oct 2010
11225 posts
Posted on 11/7/15 at 11:24 am to
quote:

The title song is God awful though. Might be the worst one of any Bond movie.


The song in Mexico City before the title song as he was walking through the parade was awesome. The whole first sequence was really cool then *spoilerish* he left the hotel and the whole movie didn't pick back up for me. It honestly didn't feel as much like a Bond movie to me.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37241 posts
Posted on 11/7/15 at 12:48 pm to
I liked it, and after thinking about it, quite a bit.

My only issue...


SPOILERS
















...is the flimsiness of Blofeld/Oberhause being behind everything that has happened to Craig's Bond so far. Just a little bit of a stretch. And I wish Bautista was able to flip the big bad stereotype on its head a little more, after a couple of films, I'd trust him.





Outside of those two things, it was solid. The pacing was ok, performances pretty good, and was a big call back to older Bonds. 3/4 for me.
This post was edited on 11/7/15 at 12:49 pm
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51239 posts
Posted on 11/7/15 at 12:50 pm to
Spectre was fine. Sky fall was fine.

I enjoyed both. I'd imagibe most James Bond fans enjoyed both.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram