Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Roku? Is it worth it?

Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:00 am
Posted by MrAndroid
South of Enterprise
Member since Feb 2011
1489 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:00 am
Does anyone here use Roku? Does it save you money? Is it worth getting rid of Satellite and switching over to Roku? Will I still be able to get NBC, CBS, ABC, FOX? Fox Sports 1?

Sorry in Advance for all the damn questions.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61435 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Is it worth getting rid of Satellite and switching over to Roku?


Based on your questions you do not understand what Roku is. Roku just lets you access TV/Movies over the Internet, you still need to subscribe to something like NetFlix, AmazonPrime or HuluPlus for any worth while content.

1) Cut cable/satellite
2) Get a digital antenna for about $50 to get your local ABC/CBS/NBC broadcasts
3) Subscribe to NetFlix for $8 = Older TV and Movies (Amazon Prime is an alternative to this with a similar catalog of TV and movies)
4) Subscribe to HuluPlus for $8 and get access to New and Previous seasons of current shows on the major broadcast and cable networks.

So for a $50 antenna, a $50 Roku, and $16 per month you can get about 90% of what you get now.

BUT, that 10% you're missing keeps most people locked in to cable.

You won't get ESPN or HBO. There is no way to get them without cable/satellite.

Now that you understand streaming TV better, is the Roku worth it? If you don't already have an XBox/PlayStation and you want to stream internet to your TV then the Roku and the Apple TV are the top choices. Unless you have Apple devices like an iPad/iPhone, you probably are better off with a Roku. If you do have iDevices and the ability to send the content of your screen to the TV is of interest to you, you should get an Apple TV.
Posted by MrAndroid
South of Enterprise
Member since Feb 2011
1489 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:15 am to
quote:

TigerinATL




Thanks a million for your input. I was not real clear what roku was but you cleared it up for me.
Posted by Neauxla
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2008
33442 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:19 am to
You also wont get the shows right when they come out
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51228 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:26 am to
Roku with Netflix and Amazon Prime subscriptions and a digital antenna for local channels is how I go.

It is worth it to me. Roku has a good selection of apps.
Posted by BaddestAndvari
That Overweight Racist State
Member since Mar 2011
18280 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:26 am to
quote:

You won't get ESPN or HBO.


and you wont get CBS broadcasting unless you watch it live....

that's why I built my own HTPC and record any shows that I like on CBS
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
79109 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:28 am to
with roku getting WATCHESPN now, is that a good supplement to not having the espn channel itself?
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61435 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:35 am to
quote:

with roku getting WATCHESPN now, is that a good supplement to not having the espn channel itself?


I've never tried it but they supposedly make you log in, so you can't watch ESPN if you don't get it via cable/satellite.
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
79109 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:37 am to
ahh that's true. that's how they get you
Posted by SirRohantheDefender
Member since Aug 2005
14788 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:39 am to
I wouldn't ever cut my DirecTV even though I don't watch the movie channels that often and I don't watch Sunday Ticket on enough of the games for it to be worth my investment.

However my advice to some would be go this route if you want to cut costs.

$100 - Apple TV - Gets you Netflix, HULU, HBOGo, WatchESPN, and more. I'm sure you know somebody with basic cable that would let you borrow their log in for WatchESPN. That gets you all the games for channels that person has.

$8 - HULU

$8 - Netflix

You can get basic shows like Survivor on CBS.com. So that route is just as easy if you have capability, especially if you put it from computer to external monitor/TV. Apple TV can do this through AirPlay.

One-time investment of 100 bucks for the Apple TV. Then 16 bucks a month to get access to your netflix/Hulu options.

The antenna for the one-time $50 is probably a good idea, too.

I'm just a sucker for having all my shows DVR'd on the box so that I can knock them out quickly and whenever I want.
Posted by SirRohantheDefender
Member since Aug 2005
14788 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:40 am to
And get someone to hook you up with an HBO Go password if you cut your cable/satellite and lose HBO. That site could keep me entertained for years. They have everything on there, at least series-wise.
Posted by TU Rob
Birmingham
Member since Nov 2008
12726 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:59 am to
quote:



I've never tried it but they supposedly make you log in, so you can't watch ESPN if you don't get it via cable/satellite.


My brother in law uses my U-verse log in to watch ESPN. And my other sister, and my parents, have UVerse here so if I ever cut the cord I could still watch with their log ins. I've thought about it after football season is over. I could do the Hulu thing. Already have Netflix and Amazon Prime, but I'm just curious how the speed and quality are. I've gotten a bit spoiled with big screen HDTV's in every room.
Posted by BaddestAndvari
That Overweight Racist State
Member since Mar 2011
18280 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 11:45 am to
quote:

$100 - Apple TV


or get a Roku instead and use Plex which isn't broken every single time Roku decides to have an "update" (The last 3 or 4 updates to the Apple TV have destroyed Plex.. it's inexcusable!) , so if you aren't already locked into the apple fraemwork.. don't get locked into the Apple framework, and:

quote:

If you're not all-in with Apple, the Roku 3 is the way to go. Historically, Roku gets new apps and services much faster than Apple TV, amassing over 750 channels to date. That admittedly includes a lot of filler content, but there's also some important services the Apple TV doesn't have, most notably Amazon Instant. Roku's new interface is a huge improvement and blazing fast on the Roku 3 hardware. And the remote with the built-in headphone jack is a truly great feature for those times when you want to stream without disturbing anyone else..


oh yeah.. and you can get a Roku 2 XD which is just as good.. for $50 instead of $100
This post was edited on 12/4/13 at 11:46 am
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
27465 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 12:15 pm to
you can also use google to find out how to watch live sporting events. just don't expect HD quality.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58035 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 12:22 pm to
the only reason I would get a Roku 2 over Roku 3 is the NetFlix UI isnt getting updated so you dont have to deal with that bullshite autoplay feature on TV shows they now cram down our throats



*edit* or if I had to use older AV cables to plug into an older TV. Roku 3 only has HDMI output
This post was edited on 12/4/13 at 12:26 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram