Started By
Message
locked post

Mila Kunis is set to be the lead actress in 50 Shades of Grey SIAP

Posted on 10/10/12 at 9:53 am
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18315 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 9:53 am
quote:

MILA Kunis is the front runner to play the lead role in the screen adaptation of hit erotic novel ’50 shades of grey’.
LINK
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83516 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 9:54 am to
so she should get naked a lot, right?
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112199 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 9:56 am to
quote:

so she should get naked a lot, right?


CGI/Stunt Double. You can bank on it
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18315 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 9:57 am to
quote:

CGI/Stunt Double. You can bank on it


I wouldn't write her off just yet.
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
40924 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 10:07 am to
we've already seen her tits in forgetting sarah marshall. so im sure she will do it again.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 10:08 am to
quote:

we've already seen her tits in forgetting sarah marshall. so im sure she will do it again.


Nice teets or no?
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31894 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 10:12 am to
quote:

we've already seen her tits in forgetting sarah marshall. so im sure she will do it again.

LOL you think those were actually hers?
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
40924 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 10:12 am to
i wanted to believe
Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38405 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 10:12 am to
quote:

we've already seen her tits in forgetting sarah marshal


Ive seen that movie a dozen times, and ive never seen her tits.
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
66396 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 10:14 am to
They weren't actually hers in Sarah Marshall.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31894 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Ive seen that movie a dozen times, and ive never seen her tits.

The picture in the bathroom... No way they're actually hers
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92876 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 10:14 am to
Oh hell yes!!!!!
Posted by buffbraz
Member since Nov 2005
5673 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 10:53 am to
She showed her arse in "Friends with Benefits"...unless it wasn't her. And she rolled and ate poontang in "Black Swan"
Posted by LSUAce007
Member since Feb 2007
9675 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 10:57 am to
quote:

She showed her arse in "Friends with Benefits"

Wasn't hers. She had a double for that scene.
LINK
Posted by buffbraz
Member since Nov 2005
5673 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 11:10 am to
frick, that sucks
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
36201 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 11:30 am to
Maybe she has a disgusting skin condition or something.
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 11:39 am to
YES!
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
22613 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 11:40 am to
Wasn't there a thread about this a while back saying Emma Watson was trying to get this role?
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 11:56 am to
The thread was about Emma Watson open to doing nude scenes I believe.
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 11:57 am
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56244 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Maybe she has a disgusting skin condition or something.
Or maybe she - oh never mind.

I miss the Hermione theory already.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram