Started By
Message

Medieval battles

Posted on 8/12/16 at 11:26 pm
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
18552 posts
Posted on 8/12/16 at 11:26 pm
Is there a more inaccurate common display in all of movies & tv. It kinda pisses me off. The ideas that battles were some sort of chaotic whirl of personal combat and individuals fighting.

The simple truth is only 5-10% of casualties of a battle happened during the battle itself. The 95% that remains are of people being ridden down when fleeing their highly structured formations. And even then, only 15-30% of an a losing army would be casualties.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83927 posts
Posted on 8/12/16 at 11:28 pm to
quote:


The simple truth is only 5-10% of casualties of a battle happened during the battle itself. The 95% that remains are of people being ridden down when fleeing their highly structured formations. And even then, only 15-30% of an a losing army would be casualties


Well write a show like this and report back and tell us how the ratings were
Posted by DanglingFury
Living the dream
Member since Dec 2007
20449 posts
Posted on 8/12/16 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

It kinda pisses me off


First world problems, man.
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
18552 posts
Posted on 8/12/16 at 11:50 pm to
LINK

Something like this is far closer to what medieval battles looked like and in my option are far more interesting. And just because it hasn't been done her doesn't mean others wouldn't find it interesting.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39165 posts
Posted on 8/12/16 at 11:54 pm to
The Spartans in 300 fought and won based on their discipline to stay in formation. They didn't always show it though. The battle scenes in Braveheart were pretty brutal and its always cool seeing heads get chopped off and stuff like that so who cares if its not accurate.
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
18552 posts
Posted on 8/12/16 at 11:55 pm to
quote:



First world problems, man.



It's a wonderful thing.l, first world problems. Otherwise, we'd go crazy as a society.
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
18552 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 12:01 am to
Ehh, I'm more interested in the tactics and formations. It really falls apart once it becomes the chaos like in the Braveheart movies.

I simply have a hard time believing characters would survive running around with a sword likens chicken with its head cut off like in the movies.

Braveheart battle scenes were pretty entertaining, but if they were like their historical counterpoints, they'd be on a whole other level. The battle of sterling bridge actually took place on a bridge admit collapsed into the water and the drama of that.

The battle of falkirk had the Scottish with roaming circular spear formations aimed at taking out calabash. Islands admistnthenendemy. Again, huge drama as some of the islands got swept up in the English movements.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
36809 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 12:07 am to
quote:

I simply have a hard time believing characters would survive running around with a sword likens chicken with its head cut off like in the movies.
Yet you're okay believing William Wallace was a 5'10" anti-Semite?
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
18552 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 12:15 am to
Ugh.......,.,,,


Ummm.....,,,,


What????

Braveheart is a movie and I fully realize that. I just wish that movies took a more invested and honest approach to how they display these battles in these epic movies. I realized earlier tonight while watxhing s battle scene that a lot of these battles have potential where there is no ambition to do something more.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
36809 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 12:31 am to
quote:

Braveheart is a movie and I fully realize that. I just wish that movies took a more invested and honest approach
So you're okay with manufacturing history as long as the battles live up to your expectations?

You shouldn't be confused by my post, I was directly poking fun at you and your ludicrous posts.

If you want a better portrayal of how events and battles actually occurred, documentaries are your friend.
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
21091 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 1:29 am to
One of your problems with perception is that the winners wrote the histories in ancient times, and they could turn skirmishes into epic battles with the turn of a pen. And formal stand-offs really could end in chaos.
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 7:50 am to
The opening scene of Romeseemed to do an excellent job of portraying formation fighting and the clockwork like precision of the Romans. And it even made a point of showing how getting out of formation was frowned upon.

The Last Kingdomat least made an effort to show shield wall fighting. Though it admittedly was hit and miss in this regard.
Posted by JohnnyBgood
South Louisiana
Member since May 2010
4281 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 9:43 am to
I thought the opening battle of Gladiator portrayed accurate battle formations and tactics.

Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76173 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 10:09 am to
People like you and I, who love reading history, will forever be disappointed with Hollywood. Just have to accept that and never expect historical accuracy. Particularly the further back in history they go.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421506 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 10:17 am to
you would probably enjoy Time Commanders on BBC
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76173 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 10:32 am to
quote:

The Last Kingdomat least made an effort to show shield wall fighting. Though it admittedly was hit and miss in this regard.


The books were much more detailed and descriptive fwiw.

300 did a good job initially then the battle scenes quickly turned into entertaining but silly spectacles.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69048 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

I thought the opening battle of Gladiator portrayed accurate battle formations and tactics.

I agree, but that's ancient combat which ironically is more accurately portrayed. The OP is right that medieval combat isn't portrayed as well. Yet most medieval battles were won by superior planning and formations and not skirmishes. Though I am sure there were some skirmishes.

Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
18552 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 12:33 pm to
There were very few open land battles in general. Sieges and defending fortifications were 90% of fighting in the Middle Ages.

I'm just sick of seeing somebody running through a battle stabbing people like bodies are made of butter. It's high fantasy.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51345 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 1:24 pm to
You have more writings available that covered Roman battled than medical ones. Hence the greater detail.

Edit: you mean swords don't just slide through well made plate armour as if it was butter?
This post was edited on 8/13/16 at 1:26 pm
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
30353 posts
Posted on 8/13/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

You have more writings available that covered Roman battled than medieval ones. Hence the greater detail.


Yes, we get these types of scenes.

Even had a "Turtle" scene in Cleopatra back in 1963.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram