- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I just finished reading The Martian and it made me love the movie even more
Posted on 1/30/17 at 11:29 am
Posted on 1/30/17 at 11:29 am
Great book and it adds a ton of depth to the story. Re-watching the movie, I ended up getting way more into it.
One of the best movies of 2015, and they did a great job adapting the book.
***Probable spoilers in replies***
One of the best movies of 2015, and they did a great job adapting the book.
***Probable spoilers in replies***
This post was edited on 1/30/17 at 11:46 am
Posted on 1/30/17 at 11:31 am to GetCocky11
Haven't read the book but I thought it was a great movie
Posted on 1/30/17 at 11:36 am to Trump4LSU
the book definitely makes the dramatic moments feel more tense.
When you have to fit so much into 2 hours, a lot of the tense moments are shortened.
When you have to fit so much into 2 hours, a lot of the tense moments are shortened.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 11:42 am to GetCocky11
quote:
Great book and it adds a ton of depth to the story. Re-watching the movie, I ended up getting way more into it.
One of the best movies of 2015, and they did a great job adapting the book.
Yeah, I enjoyed the movie even more after reading the book. It was a quick read too, I couldn't put it down.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 11:43 am to GetCocky11
I read the book before watching the movie. The book was much better because they had to cut out too much for the movie. His "space pirate" joke in the movie doesn't even make sense because they cut out the part where he screwed up the radio and lost his connection to Earth. The trip lost a lot of its tension since there was no storm to not be able to warn him about.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 11:45 am to Esquire
quote:
The trip lost a lot of its tension since there was no storm to not be able to warn him about.
You can say there was a sort of tension swap because I didn't feel much tension in the book when they had to pull Mark from the MAV to the Hermes.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 11:51 am to GetCocky11
quote:
You can say there was a sort of tension swap because I didn't feel much tension in the book when they had to pull Mark from the MAV to the Hermes.
I agree with you there. The ending of the book was pretty anti-climatic. It was great how they changed it, but still managed to incorporate his Iron Man joke.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 12:05 pm to Esquire
quote:
I agree with you there. The ending of the book was pretty anti-climatic. It was great how they changed it, but still managed to incorporate his Iron Man joke.
So the Iron Man part wasn't in the book? I disliked that part a lot, went a bit too far trying to add action to the movie. It didn't need it.
This post was edited on 1/30/17 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 1/30/17 at 12:07 pm to GetCocky11
Read the book then saw the movie. Book >>> movie.
How rewatchable is it for those that have seen it again?
How rewatchable is it for those that have seen it again?
Posted on 1/30/17 at 12:11 pm to Dam Guide
quote:
So the Iron Man part wasn't in the book? I disliked that part a lot, went a bit too far trying to add action to the movie. It didn't need it.
Spoilers
Mark Watney suggest the Iron Man technique in the book like he does in the movie; however, it wasn't used in the book.
This post was edited on 1/30/17 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 1/30/17 at 12:17 pm to GetCocky11
The only thing I liked about the book moreso than the movie was the fact that he was a mechanical engineer in the book, and botany was his secondary MS. So it made some of the stuff he was able to Macguyver a little more believable than him just being really handy as he was portrayed in the film. Cutting the storm and other stuff I could see being done for time constraints.
Spoiler: In the book when recounting the rescue, Watney says when they make the movie the whole crew will be standing around giving out hugs and stuff... which is exactly the way that scene takes place in the movie.
Spoiler: In the book when recounting the rescue, Watney says when they make the movie the whole crew will be standing around giving out hugs and stuff... which is exactly the way that scene takes place in the movie.
This post was edited on 1/30/17 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 1/30/17 at 12:28 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
Mark Watney suggest the Iron Man technique in the book like he does in the movie; however, it wasn't used in the book.
Sounds better because him mentioning it was funny, actually doing it was dumb.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 12:49 pm to saintsfan92612
quote:
the book definitely makes the dramatic moments feel more tense.
When you have to fit so much into 2 hours, a lot of the tense moments are shortened.
quote:
I read the book before watching the movie. The book was much better because they had to cut out too much for the movie. His "space pirate" joke in the movie doesn't even make sense because they cut out the part where he screwed up the radio and lost his connection to Earth. The trip lost a lot of its tension since there was no storm to not be able to warn him about.
Agree with both of those. The movie glossed over some really important shite. Which is understandable, but there was way more in the book that happened, or happened differently. One of the biggest obstacles in the book was the journey to the MAV and the storm, and that was about five minutes max in the movie. And what it crazy is that it was still a pretty long movie anyway.
I read the book first, which is rare for me, since I generally don't like reading, but for whatever reason I knew I would really like the book. And I've read it twice now. And I remember talking on here about how I can't wait for the movie to come out so I could be all uppity and be like "Meh, the book was WAY better." And then I saw the movie and it was actually true.
Long story short, I enjoyed the movie but not as much as I wanted to. And it glossed over most of the major obstacles of the book.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 12:49 pm to GetCocky11
They did a really good job adapting the movie. There were a few minor differences, but nothing that really took away from the overall experience.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 12:50 pm to Dam Guide
The best thing the movie did better than the book was to make sure Sean Bean's character was on the Council of Elrond..again
Posted on 1/30/17 at 1:00 pm to meeple
quote:
Read the book then saw the movie. Book >>> movie.
How rewatchable is it for those that have seen it again?
Never read the book, but I did re watch the movie. Watched it when it first came on HBO, maybe 7 or 8 months ago. Caught it again a couple weeks ago. I enjoyed it just as much the second time.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News