- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Batman V Superman TV Spot 4 - Spoilers in this thread
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:15 am to SnoopALoop
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:15 am to SnoopALoop
Snyder is a real reactionary
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:20 am to Tactical1
I defended MoS pretty hard awhile back, I thought the deaths were implied...which helped make it a great "Superman" (as opposed to Kal-El) origin story.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:44 am to kballa6
quote:Possible Spoilers......
the movie is going to be all over the place trying to introduce 5 main story heros and villains in one movie is insane.
The recipe that doomed Spider Man 3 and The Amazing Spider Man 2.
It's my understanding that Batman is really the only one that gets a lot of origin focus. Superman is not being introduced. He's already been established. They won't be going into Wonder Woman's origin because she has a movie coming out soon. I've heard from people that Aquaman will have two VERY brief appearances and that Cyborg and Flash will only be in a post credits scene (at least in costume). We'll see. They could be wrong. Batman will be the main focus of the movie. One could argue that maybe they should have just made a stand alone Batman movie first. Personally I think we've had enough of those for awhile. One could also argue that Wonder Woman could have been left out. I would tend to agree with that, but let's see how they handle it. Who knows. Batman being the main focus is probably the best way to go. We'll see.
This post was edited on 1/25/16 at 10:45 am
Posted on 1/25/16 at 10:48 am to RonBurgundy
Well, honestly, you could have called Avengers "Thor vs Iron Man" because of their early fight, although that would be a dumb and misleading name. Does anyone know how much screen time we got with Thor vs Iron Man and Thor vs Hulk in that film? Does anyone think we'll get more Batman vs Superman fighting than the Thor totals?
My problem is this doesn't quite have the Avenger setup; we know who Superman is because he just fought Zod, we "know" who Batman is because of the Nolan trilogy (it might be a little different, but it's still fresh in our minds). But who the hell is Wonder Woman? Is she just Captain America with boobs (the shield scene), or is she legitimately near her comic book level? Either way, Avengers had all the team established, and this doesn't.
My problem is this doesn't quite have the Avenger setup; we know who Superman is because he just fought Zod, we "know" who Batman is because of the Nolan trilogy (it might be a little different, but it's still fresh in our minds). But who the hell is Wonder Woman? Is she just Captain America with boobs (the shield scene), or is she legitimately near her comic book level? Either way, Avengers had all the team established, and this doesn't.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 11:01 am to Scoob
quote:
My problem is this doesn't quite have the Avenger setup; we know who Superman is because he just fought Zod, we "know" who Batman is because of the Nolan trilogy (it might be a little different, but it's still fresh in our minds). But who the hell is Wonder Woman? Is she just Captain America with boobs (the shield scene), or is she legitimately near her comic book level? Either way, Avengers had all the team established, and this doesn't.
How many movies do you go into already knowing all of the characters? This year we had Spotlight, The Big Short, Mad Max Fury Road... all ensemble movies. We didn't know anything about any of the characters prior to these movies, yet they were all awesome films.
For some insane reason, people believe that comic book movies should now require that every character have their own solo feature film before they appear on screen in someone else's movie. Even though we have repeatedly had successful superhero team movies that include characters that have never been on screen before.
This post was edited on 1/25/16 at 11:03 am
Posted on 1/25/16 at 11:10 am to Fewer Kilometers
Age of Ultron is a good example. We had three heroes and a new villain introduced, as well as all of the original characters.
All of the X-Men movies are another example. They have tons of characters introduced with little to no backstory other than one short scene.
There's also Watchmen. I thought that was a great movie.
It's actually pretty normal to do this in Superhero movies. Personally I don't think it ruins the movie at all. It's how it's constructed that ruins the movie. I'm not sure why people use this as an argument, honestly.
All of the X-Men movies are another example. They have tons of characters introduced with little to no backstory other than one short scene.
There's also Watchmen. I thought that was a great movie.
It's actually pretty normal to do this in Superhero movies. Personally I don't think it ruins the movie at all. It's how it's constructed that ruins the movie. I'm not sure why people use this as an argument, honestly.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 11:22 am to Fewer Kilometers
quote:Good point, but the Wonder Woman issue is pretty damn big. If she's at her comic book level, we're talking about a character that if Superman wasn't present, might be the most powerful person on the planet, and would easily kick Batman's arse. All of his speculation about Superman would apply to her too, other than the fact that she has not fought and defeated an alien assault bent on destroying the planet.
For some insane reason, people believe that comic book movies should now require that every character have their own solo feature film before they appear on screen in someone else's movie. Even though we have repeatedly had successful superhero team movies that include characters that have never been on screen before.
To include her into this film will be interesting. If she's just tossed in randomly and powered up would be bad. To present her as just an athletic chick with some neat toys would be pretty bad, too, as it wastes a prime character. She's NOT just a supporting character; or shouldn't be.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 11:24 am to Scoob
quote:How do you know we won't get an explanation of where she comes from? Did you have a problem not knowing much about Quiksilver and Scarlet Witch?
but the Wonder Woman issue is pretty damn big.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 11:31 am to abellsujr
quote:
How do you know we won't get an explanation of where she comes from?
Because she is getting her own standalone movie that DC has said will be her origin.
I think they will go the Vision route with her and briefly explain where she came from and why she is there. I don't expect too much backstory at all.
To the average person (>50% of the people who will see this), they don't know Wonder Woman, Doomsday, Aquaman, Cyborg, or any other rumored characters. My wife and I were watching the special last week and I had to explain to her all of those characters and Suicide Squad.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 11:31 am to Breesus
quote:
quote:
Find out if he was a good guy or a bad guy?
How?
quote:
Check out his past actions?
His literal only past actions are taking place in a massive fight that leveled a city and almost destroyed a world. No other actions.
There is alot wrong with this movie in the marketing and trailers, but the "why would batman and Superman ever fight" rhetoric is so dumb. It's a solid grounded story arc in the comics and it makes slots of sense based on Batman.
I may have overstated my original post. Or at least not qualified it properly. Superheros fight before teaming up all the time in the comics and I don't have a problem with that per se. It was more that clip with Bruce babbling about they have to fight him if there was a 1% chance he was bad.
I do hope that they build a little more into it than Batman just deciding that a super powered being is too dangerous not to attack him. That's kind of Lex Luthor territory.
Usually in the books it's some interference or shenanigans by the villain that initially set the heroes against each other. Or else some Three's Company type of misunderstanding.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 11:35 am to abellsujr
quote:
quote:
but the Wonder Woman issue is pretty damn big.
quote:I don't, and I hope we get a good one. I want this movie to be good
How do you know we won't get an explanation of where she comes from?
quote:No, I didn't. I also don't rate them as anywhere near the level of Wonder Woman in order of importance to their respective universes. She's not a Songbird (Shield) or Black Canary (Arrow) character, she's up there with Hulk in terms of a) overall popularity and awareness, and b) impact on any particular battle amongst characters.
Did you have a problem not knowing much about Quiksilver and Scarlet Witch?
Posted on 1/25/16 at 11:38 am to kballa6
quote:And I personally have no problem with that. A lot of these characters will be a mystery and will get a standalone movie. My wife had no idea who many of the X-Men and MCU characters were when they were introduced, but they introduce them in a way that doesn't ruin the movie. It's possible to do it right and we've seen examples of that. For people to say that having a lot of characters in a movie is a mistake is unmerited, IMO. The only thing that matters is what they choose to focus the story on. They have to have one main focus with all of the characters supporting that central plot.
I think they will go the Vision route with her and briefly explain where she came from and why she is there. I don't expect too much backstory at all.
My point is, it's not the end of the world to have a lot of characters. It's how those characters are presented.
This post was edited on 1/25/16 at 11:50 am
Posted on 1/25/16 at 11:41 am to kballa6
quote:
I think they will go the Vision route with her and briefly explain where she came from and why she is there. I don't expect too much backstory at all.
I'm guessing the audience will learn a little bit about WW through Batman. I bet at some point Bruce gets suspicious of her (like where it looked like he was staring her down as she is getting into the car), and starts looking into her.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 11:45 am to Scoob
quote:I agree. I also think Wonder Woman is pretty well known. I think most people know who she is. Someone said 50%. I would say it's more like 70%-80% of people who see the movie will know who she is.
I also don't rate them as anywhere near the level of Wonder Woman in order of importance to their respective universes.
With that being said, I think this movie would have been just fine with just Batman and Superman. I do agree that Wonder Woman being in it was an interesting choice, but I don't completely discredit the movie for attempting it. I'm interested to see how things play out.
This post was edited on 1/25/16 at 11:48 am
Posted on 1/25/16 at 11:55 am to abellsujr
Another huge spoiler is being released with the new Empire article. I'm a huge supporter of this film, but this is getting ridciculous DC
Posted on 1/25/16 at 11:59 am to abellsujr
I just saw it on comicbookmovie.com My work computer is now blocking that site
Posted on 1/25/16 at 12:01 pm to RLDSC FAN
I'll check it out. I really hope they don't release any major spoilers to the media.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 12:16 pm to WestlakeTiger
quote:
I have a very bad feeling about this movie.
Terrible casting, and villain choices
Posted on 1/25/16 at 12:29 pm to abellsujr
quote:
I'll check it out. I really hope they don't release any major spoilers to the media.
They actually included them in the teasers, but I guess no one (including myself) even noticed. If there was a spoiler tag on the OP subject line, I'd link the pictures.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News