Started By
Message

Amanda Knox Netflix Documentary (possible spoilers)

Posted on 9/30/16 at 6:52 pm
Posted by AlbertMeansWell
Member since Sep 2013
5555 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 6:52 pm
Anyone watched it yet? Thoughts?
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
48664 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

(possible spoilers)

really?
Posted by CapperVin
Member since Apr 2013
10531 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

really?


Posted by Signal Soldier
30.411994,-91.183929
Member since Dec 2010
8174 posts
Posted on 10/2/16 at 11:28 pm to
I just finished it... kinda lame tbh. Don't know what else to say about it.
Posted by tonic
Member since Oct 2009
439 posts
Posted on 10/3/16 at 7:51 am to
I agree. There wasn't any new revelations and the personal interviews with Amanda were boring.

These kinds of documentaries are in my wheel house but this one just didn't satisfy me, 2 stars out of 5.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35395 posts
Posted on 10/3/16 at 10:53 am to
It was okay.

She still kind of comes off as distant.

But then again, she spent 4 years in an Italian prison for a crime she didn't commit. That would make most people, Andy Dufresne aloof and bitter and distant.

As other reviewers have pointed out...the doc would have been far better if they had focused more on how the Italian police totally botched this - on purpose - for headlines and got caught up in a modern day Salem witch trial full of absurd hysteria and crazy Satanic theories instead of the most obvious...Rudy Guede, rape and murder.

Maybe it's the Catholicism because even the lead investigator in the documentary always kept talking about God and evil and demons.

Like "Making a Murderer" the doc would have been far more fascinating to show how F-upped the Italian criminal justice system is and how nobody checks anybody up the food the chain...crazy theory starts on the street and moves upward unfettered to the highest court...until 4 years later they have to finally say..."uh, this is crazy, lower courts, police, are you people nuts?"

That was the final court ruling...basically a real life "rush to judgment" - the police focused on one crazy theory and ran with it...fit the evidence to match the story, instead of the other way around. Sold papers, became celebrities.

This post was edited on 10/3/16 at 10:55 am
Posted by STLhog
Nashville, TN
Member since Jan 2015
17712 posts
Posted on 10/3/16 at 6:39 pm to
100% Guede did it.

He even said Knox wasn't there. The whole thing was just fricking bizarre and really sucks for her.

frick Italy anyway.
Posted by AlbertMeansWell
Member since Sep 2013
5555 posts
Posted on 10/3/16 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

100% Guede did it.

He even said Knox wasn't there. The whole thing was just fricking bizarre and really sucks for her.

frick Italy anyway.


No doubt. If this had happened anywhere else, Knox and her frick buddy would've never been charged.
Posted by KG6
Member since Aug 2009
10920 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 8:37 am to
We watched this last night. My wife still kept saying, "there's just something not right about her". And I agree. But you can't charge someone for murder because of that. Her aloofness and general personality put her in a very weird position being so close to a murder. I can understand why she was a person of interest initially.

But it seems like no matter what the evidence, they used her "strange behavior" to tie it back constantly. They could have had video of a guy walking in with a duffle bag and coming out covered in blood, and they would have tried to prove that Amanda Knox was in that duffle bag. I think the documentary did a decent job of showing that. How the media and a few opinions spiraled into ruining someone's life. For people to be standing outside of the courtroom so angry when the initial verdict was overturned was insane. The story was already true in their eyes from the way it was depicted in the media. No need to worry that there was literally 0 evidence.

I'll admit that the false confessions are damning. But we see that over and over again. I just don't see how people are so stupid that they confess to stuff the didn't do.

Overall, this wasn't as interesting as I thought it'd be, but I really never paid attention to this case at all, so it's nice to get a detailed overview (however biased it may be).
Posted by litenin
Houston
Member since Mar 2016
2345 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 8:50 am to
That Italian DA (or whatever he was) that participated in the documentary made himself look really bad. He started by saying how infatuated he was with murder-mystery detective shows and continually provided a window into his incompetent detective skills.

After screwing up something that egregiously, most people would show some tact or not participate at all in the documentary. He closes by saying that if she's guilty, she will have to answer to God in her ultimate trial. I don't think it even crossed his mind that he may as well over this entire situation.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42163 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 8:55 am to
Nothing really new but she's a wack job.
There are some disturbing things, like the phone call she made not too long after to a friend and the phone call to him after they were both acquitted. Hard to believe they only knew each other that short of a time.

I think she was so high she probably doesn't remember what really happened that night. Guede could have been protecting her.
Posted by KG6
Member since Aug 2009
10920 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Guede could have been protecting her


So he scrubbed the crime scene only leaving his DNA? Or was she cognizant enough to wear a full body suit to keep her DNA off of stuff, but high enough to go into a murderous rage. She was definitely a whack job, but I've met plenty of those. The way she talked to her friend on the phone was weird (especially when the friend made the comment about how this will be the best year of her life even after her roommate was murdered). But that doesn't point to her being a murderer even if it is suspicious.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64886 posts
Posted on 10/4/16 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Amanda Knox


Would bang, but would avoid letting her tie me up.

Posted by pioneerbasketball
Team Bunchie
Member since Oct 2005
132158 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 1:54 am to
quote:

There wasn't any new revelations and the personal interviews with Amanda were boring.

this.

Late bump but just got around to watching it.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33257 posts
Posted on 1/18/17 at 10:10 am to
Late bump, finally got to see it. I actually knew next to nothing about the case before watching. (They left out one of the only things I DID know about, which was that the US refused to return her to Italy after she had been re-convicted. I always thought that was badass.)
quote:

There are some disturbing things, like the phone call she made not too long after to a friend and the phone call to him after they were both acquitted.
You were disturbed by the fact that she celebrated the actual ending of a crushing ordeal over 8 years with the only other person in the world who shared the ordeal with her? Weird.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 1/18/17 at 11:06 am to
I didn't know much about the case, but this doc didn't hook me like Making a Murderer. The Italian investigator was clearly incompetent and had a bit of a God complex to boot. I don't think she's that weird, she's just understandably guarded, but that doesn't lead to a compelling interview.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
420832 posts
Posted on 1/18/17 at 11:34 am to
watched it last week

man that prosecutor was a fricking a-hole

i can't believe they could get a conviction with such flimsy evidence, and when it was shown the evidence was bunk, the population ignored that
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89453 posts
Posted on 1/18/17 at 11:52 am to
quote:

man that prosecutor was a fricking a-hole


Honestly, most of them are (and some I consider dear friends).

quote:

i can't believe they could get a conviction with such flimsy evidence, and when it was shown the evidence was bunk, the population ignored that


Yeah - they were still regulating morality - the prosecution successfully painted Knox as a fallen woman, and she was convicted for that. Unlike "Making a Murderer" - this one convinces me that Knox was not as involved as I previous suspected (or not at all).
This post was edited on 1/18/17 at 11:52 am
Posted by JackVincennes
NOLA
Member since Jan 2014
3892 posts
Posted on 1/18/17 at 1:08 pm to
If you want to see how fricked up Giuliano Mignini is read "The Monster of Florence". The Knox case is not the first time that he went on a wild and crazy demonic ride prosecuting a case. To say our system is flawed is legit but the fact that this idiot has a job is incredible. And the Italian public still believes the shite this guy spews?
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33257 posts
Posted on 1/18/17 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

If you want to see how fricked up Giuliano Mignini is read "The Monster of Florence". The Knox case is not the first time that he went on a wild and crazy demonic ride prosecuting a case. To say our system is flawed is legit but the fact that this idiot has a job is incredible. And the Italian public still believes the shite this guy spews?
Italian society is deeply flawed and infected with machismo and false moralism.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram