Started By
Message

US, Mexico and Canada Join Forces to Bid for FIFA 2026 World Cup

Posted on 4/10/17 at 1:48 pm
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
22710 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 1:48 pm

So let me get this straight.... Qatar hosts a world Cup independently, yet the best suited country in the world to host these kinds of events needs two other large nations?? I call bullshite on all of this.

LINK
quote:

The North American soccer ruling body will announce Monday that the United States, Mexico and Canada will make a bid to host jointly the FIFA 2026 World Cup.

ESPN FC reported earlier last week that the United States, Mexico and Canada would make a joint-bid that would “rise above politics” to host the 2026 World Cup in an expanded 48-game tournament. With the 3 nations sharing their most competitive facilities, the joint venture should be able to drastically reduce the hosting costs.

FIFA is expected to set 2026 World Cup tournament hosting requirements at its Congress meeting in Bahrain on the 11th of May, and make its final award determination in May 2020.



This post was edited on 4/10/17 at 1:49 pm
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51239 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 1:50 pm to
You have to first realize that Qatar bribed the shite out of FIFA officials to get their bid.
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
28255 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

realize that Qatar bribed the shite out of FIFA officials to get their bid.


We sent our slimiest and he couldn't get it done as well.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34862 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 1:55 pm to
FIFA also despises us.
Posted by Akit1
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2006
7598 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 1:57 pm to
I like this. You know there's going to be some crazy fan who makes the road trip from Mexico City to Vancouver.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 2:04 pm to
In 2026 they are expanding the tournament to 48 teams, which should equal more games. The bid says that the US will host 60 of the 80 games. Canada and Mexico will each host 10. Every game starting with the Quarterfinals will be in the US.

FIFA also likes putting the WC in a country that hasn't had it yet, so adding Canada will help. Also, Mexico hasn't hosted since 1986.

If Mexico wanted more games, we would have went with a solo bid.
This post was edited on 4/10/17 at 2:18 pm
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115415 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

The bid says that the US will host 60 of the 80 games.


That means NOLA would have a good chance to get at least one early round game, which would be pretty legit.
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49227 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:10 pm to
FIFA puts the NCAA to shame when it comes to being corrupt
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36583 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

That means NOLA would have a good chance to get at least one early round game, which would be pretty legit.



there were 12 sites for Brazil

Locks: New York, Chicago, L.A. (Rose bowl? or new rams stadium)


Next level: Miami, Dallas, Houston, Seattle, ATL(?), NOLA
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
29122 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:17 pm to
i bet phoenix and santa clara get games as well.
Posted by Mr Personality
Bangkok
Member since Mar 2014
27364 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:19 pm to
Xavi says he loves Qatar and it's a perfect WC host...as more money is shoved in his pocket
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101915 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:19 pm to
Plus Philly, DC area, New England, and that's not counting the Mexican and Canadian sites.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145059 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

L.A. (Rose bowl? or new rams stadium)
it would be at the new stadium. could possibly use both but the new stadium is a lock
This post was edited on 4/10/17 at 3:21 pm
Posted by Mr Personality
Bangkok
Member since Mar 2014
27364 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:23 pm to
Lalas said last night that US should get 75% while Canada and Mexico split 25%
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

there were 12 sites for Brazil

Locks: New York, Chicago, L.A. (Rose bowl? or new rams stadium)


Next level: Miami, Dallas, Houston, Seattle, ATL(?), NOLA


Vegas new stadium, Falcons new stadium, and Jerry World are locks IMO.


ETA:

All 3 cities are massive and have plenty of hotel rooms and infrastructure to handle it. Vegas would be so fricking badass.

This post was edited on 4/10/17 at 3:26 pm
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36583 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

99
i bet phoenix and santa clara get games as well.


maybe even Las Vegas too
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115415 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

That means NOLA would have a good chance to get at least one early round game, which would be pretty legit.


actually I think all men's world cup games need to be on grass so we wouldn't have a shot
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145059 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:27 pm to
jerry world and the new stadium in atlanta are locks

also think US bank stadium in minneapolis will get some games

under the assumption that we will be getting 9 of the assumed 12 sites

new york, LA, chicago, DFW, atlanta, minneapolis, SF, miami, phoenix
This post was edited on 4/10/17 at 3:31 pm
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101915 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:29 pm to
When the US hosted in 1994 they only used 9 venues...

Los Angeles area - Rose Bowl
San Francisco area - Stanford Stadium
Detroit area - Pontiac Silverdome
Orlando - Citrus Bowl
Dallas - Cotton Bowl
Chicago - Soldier Field
Washington DC - RFK Stadium
New York area - Giants Stadium
New England - Foxboro Stadium

Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115415 posts
Posted on 4/10/17 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Los Angeles area - Rose Bowl
San Francisco area - Stanford Stadium
Detroit area - Pontiac Silverdome
Orlando - Citrus Bowl
Dallas - Cotton Bowl
Chicago - Soldier Field
Washington DC - RFK Stadium
New York area - Giants Stadium
New England - Foxboro Stadium


The 2026 will have a drastically expanded field from that World Cup, so more stadiums will be necessary.

Also think they will want natural grass stadiums, especially after the Woman's World Cup fiasco.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram