Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Under Armour files trademark infringement lawsuit against "arse Armor"

Posted on 2/19/15 at 2:46 pm
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33912 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 2:46 pm
quote:

Snowboarder Casey Scherr started a company called arse Armor in 2013 to sell shock-absorbing athletic shorts designed to protect the tailbone. Now, the Ft. Lauderdale company faces a trademark infringement lawsuit from Under Armour — and plans to fight.

The $3 billion Baltimore athletic apparel maker also accused the snowboard shorts maker of unfair competition and cybersquatting for using the name arse Armor and a tagline that could be confused with Under Armour's. The defendant copies Under Armour by using similar lettering and putting the arse Armor name along the shorts' waistband, the lawsuit says.

"Making matters worse, similar to Under Armour's well-known and widely promoted Protect This House tagline mark, defendants use, advertise and promote their arse Armor mark, name and products… in connection with the Protect Your Assets tagline," says the lawsuit, filed last month in U.S. District Court in Maryland.


LINK
This post was edited on 2/19/15 at 2:52 pm
Posted by Lee to Toliver
Member since Oct 2011
5840 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 2:48 pm to
Goodbye arse armor
Posted by fightingtiger2335
heh?
Member since Aug 2007
61157 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 2:49 pm to
Kiss it unser armour
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28192 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 2:56 pm to
It's a favorable venue for them in Maryland. However, it seems that UA is looking to basically put a monopoly on the use of the work "Armor" or "Armour". That's a pretty generic word to trademark. Essentially they are looking to prohibit the use of the word "Armor" in the name of any and all apparel.

I'm not saying that the "arse Armor" company isn't trying to profit of of the name recognition and goodwill of UA (I think they probably are), but is a court going to allow UA to be the only clothing company allowed to use the word "Armor"?
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18955 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 2:57 pm to
Damn, Under Armor be actin' an arse.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
78821 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 3:50 pm to
I'm headed to NOLA tomorrow so I had to go check out some dog kennels and one of the places I went to yesterday used to be called Fritz Carlton The Ritz Carlton sent them a cease and desist letter telling them to change their name......or else
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6360 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

I'm not saying that the "arse Armor" company isn't trying to profit of of the name recognition and goodwill of UA (I think they probably are


That's my feeling as well. I think Under Armour's arguments are pretty weak outside of the fact that the guy is probably trying to capitalize off the comparison.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 4:39 pm to
The Petz Carlton was the original name of Pets Plaza in Baton Rouge and they got a similar letter.
Posted by TexasTiger1185
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2011
13069 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 4:40 pm to
There's a thrift store on Freret called "Bloomin'Deals"
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46174 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 5:26 pm to
They're clearly trying to capitalize off of Under Armour. They should get sued.
This post was edited on 2/19/15 at 5:27 pm
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58028 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 5:34 pm to
man frick that noise

they shouldn't get the damn trademark to a word like armor
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 5:35 pm to
I'm with UA on this one.
Posted by Backinthe615
Member since Nov 2011
6871 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

cybersquatting


Damn Matrix, you scary.

It kinda does sound like they were trying to camp on UA's name, but maybe all the free pub will balance out costs of the case they're about to lose.
Posted by johnnydrama
Possibly Trashy
Member since Feb 2010
8710 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

quote:
I'm not saying that the "arse Armor" company isn't trying to profit of of the name recognition and goodwill of UA (I think they probably are


That's my feeling as well. I think Under Armour's arguments are pretty weak outside of the fact that the guy is probably trying to capitalize off the comparison.

I'm with y'all. Like Armor-All.
Posted by BeaumontBengal
Member since Feb 2005
2334 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 7:08 pm to
Is Salt Armour next?

LINK
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6360 posts
Posted on 2/19/15 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

They're clearly trying to capitalize off of Under Armour. They should get sued.


It's not that clear. It's pretty damn difficult to confuse "arse Armor" for "Under Armour." "Protect Your Assets" is 66.7% different than "Protect This House." And I don't believe Under Armour was the first to put their brand name on the waistband of their clothing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram