- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Titans/Rams Preseason thread | FOX
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:05 am to blkhawktiger
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:05 am to blkhawktiger
I don't care what the semantics argument is for or against mettenberger's ceiling or future potential is, you don't pass up a franchise qb at the top of a draft when you have a losing franchise and your other guy hasn't won you a game yet.
0
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:05 am to sms151t
quote:Yeh Luck played in the stoneage.... And I picked other true pocket passers to compare to. Mett had a very good rookie year for a dropback passer. There is really no argument against that
But you also compared two different eras and two different styles of offense.
This post was edited on 8/24/15 at 9:07 am
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:08 am to lsupride87
quote:
Mett had a very good rookie year for a dropback passer. There is really no argument against that
maybe but a team can't chance passing on the next better russel wilson bc they had a ryan mallet or matt cassel on roster.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:08 am to lsupride87
No you can. The problem is your argument hinges on the assumption that those 6 games for Mett will translate to a career in the form of Brady's, Manning's, etc.
Which is a HUGE frickin assumption you drooling idiot.
I watched him last year. Every snap of every game. In no way, shape, or form did I or anybody else see visions of a young Brady or Manning.
Which is a HUGE frickin assumption you drooling idiot.
I watched him last year. Every snap of every game. In no way, shape, or form did I or anybody else see visions of a young Brady or Manning.
This post was edited on 8/24/15 at 9:10 am
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:09 am to blkhawktiger
quote:
The problem is your argument hinges on the assumption that those 6 games for Mett will translate to a career in the form of Brady's, Manning's, etc. Which is a HUGE frickin assumption you drooling idiot
Damn man you is mad. What if those numbers just show Mett had a very good rookie year? Which is all I am trying to do you drooling idiot. Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:10 am to blkhawktiger
quote:He actually looked alot better than young Brady to be honest. Young Brady wasnt very good.
or form did I or anybody else see visions of a young Brady
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:12 am to lsupride87
'A very good rookie year' does not equal a comparison to Brady or Manning's rookie stats.
Sweet backpedal.
Sweet backpedal.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:12 am to Chad504boy
quote:Look Im not arguing against that. You could be right. I am arguing agaisnt the guy who thinks we are being giant homers for thinking Mett has a chance to be better. The guy has looked very good thus far in his career
maybe but a team can't chance passing on the next better russel wilson bc they had a ryan mallet or matt cassel on roster
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:12 am to blkhawktiger
quote:Are you a dumbass? No matter how mad it makes you Metts stats as a rookie are better. Draw whatever conslusion you want from that, but it is a stonecold fact
'A very good rookie year' does not equal a comparison to Brady or Manning's rookie stats.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:13 am to lsupride87
Brady played in 1 game his rookie season.
And was a pro bowler and Super Bowl MVP in his first year as a starter.
And was a pro bowler and Super Bowl MVP in his first year as a starter.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:14 am to blkhawktiger
Can someone please explain to me why ZM7 is being mentioned in the same breath as Manning & Brady?
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:15 am to lsupride87
quote:
I am arguing agaisnt the guy who thinks we are being giant homers for thinking Mett has a chance to be better. The guy has looked very good thus far in his career
i guess there's the chance but there's going to be less opportunity for him. most likely if he leaves titans or traded, he's obviously going to a bad team again. maybe with the pressure being off of him, its allowing him to get better more so than if he had the pressure. if that makes any sense.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:15 am to JBeam
quote:Is it against the law to compare rookie stats of QBs? Jesus christ I cant compare that people cant see that is all I doing
Can someone please explain to me why ZM7 is being mentioned in the same breath as Manning & Brady?
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:15 am to JBeam
Because this idiot think Metts rookie year was really good and is grabbing at straws.
Brady didn't start until his second year. He was a Pro Bowler and Super Bowl MVP.
But "Mett was better!"
No he wasn't. STFU
Brady didn't start until his second year. He was a Pro Bowler and Super Bowl MVP.
But "Mett was better!"
No he wasn't. STFU
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:16 am to JBeam
quote:
ZM7 is being mentioned in the same breath as Manning & Brady?
white
tallish
leanish
non scrambling
pocket passers
all drafted out of major colleges
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:17 am to lsupride87
No we see it. You're just doing it very poorly.
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:17 am to blkhawktiger
quote:Ok then,
Titans/Rams Preseason thread | FOX by blkhawktigerBrady played in 1 game his rookie season. And was a pro bowler and Super Bowl MVP in his first year as a starter.
Bradys first 3 years as a starter:
QB rating of 86, 85, 86
Once again, that does not mean I think Mett will be as good as Brady or Manning. However, it means that it makes sense to be excited about how he performed as a rookie. That should not be a hard concept to grasp
This post was edited on 8/24/15 at 9:18 am
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:19 am to Chad504boy
quote:If that's all we need.... tGOAT
white
tallish
leanish
non scrambling
pocket passers
all drafted out of major colleges
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:19 am to blkhawktiger
quote:You honestly are being irrationally retarded here
No he wasn't. STFU
When you look at Metts rookie numbers, and they compare to guys like Luck, Manning, and Brady, it makes sense for one to think Mett has a chance to be a good QB in the NFL. That shouldnt make you angry or assume that I am saying he will one day be better than any of those Qbs
Posted on 8/24/15 at 9:19 am to lsupride87
Yep, I'm officially done.
Thanks for the laughs. Enjoy your fantasy land.
Thanks for the laughs. Enjoy your fantasy land.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News