Started By
Message

re: This is how Bill Romanowski would stop Cam Newton

Posted on 2/7/16 at 12:46 pm to
Posted by rb
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
5633 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

The defensive back?


Yes
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 12:49 pm to
Lott was great at knocking the piss out of 175lb defenseless receivers and could lay a good lick on a 200lb running back in the 80s and 90s.

A 6.5, 250lb man that runs a 4.6 or so and is running at him, not trying to catch a pass is going to put Lotts dick in the dirt.
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
117678 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 12:52 pm to
Bill would send Cam to the hospital.
Posted by rb
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
5633 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 12:52 pm to
Steve Atwater nearly killed Christian Akoye in a football game. Akoye was a 260 lb rb for KC. The game was different.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 12:52 pm to
Btw, YouTube search bo jackson ronnie lott.

You will see lott attempt to hit Bo high and see lott land on his arse while Bo strolls along, through him, then out of bounds.

And Bo was 225 lbs.
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
91640 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 12:55 pm to
People in this thread don't understand how good Cam Newton is at avoiding big hits. He's only been hit hard on a couple of occasions in his life. And I've never seen a player get the best of Cam when both go 1 on 1 in the open field.
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139837 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 12:55 pm to
I can tell you have no respect for Lott. Lott was a hitter but you're right he'd not destroy him. The Lott myth is a lot like the Bo running over Bosworth myth, shaped by the media.

Atwater may have been more of a bigger hitter than Lott. Tatum for sure was.

This post was edited on 2/7/16 at 12:56 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162191 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

Ronnie Lott would frick Cam Newton up.You young bucks don't realize how violent this game was 30 yrs ago. It really isn't debatable.



Players 30 years ago were pussies compared to now and most of them would get their shite wrecked
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
117678 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 12:57 pm to
lol

I see what's going on here.


Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162191 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 1:01 pm to
I'm serious. I don't get the whole notion that things were more violent back then. They weren't. There are more rules to protect players but it's just as violent now.
Posted by rb
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
5633 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 1:03 pm to
You answered your own question. They wouldn't protect a Cam Newton in that era of the game.
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
117678 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 1:03 pm to
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53005 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 1:06 pm to
You must not have read the '85 Bears 30 for 30 thread. Powerman and SFP think the Texas/USC squads in the '06 BCSCG would wreck the '85 Bears.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 1:11 pm to
I respect lott fine. I'm just speaking facts and what would obviously happen if he took on Cam head on.

And instead of Atwater (who was a pretty big hitter), you should use Chuck Cecil. That sob really was a headhunter.
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
117678 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 1:17 pm to
lmao


No. I missed all of that.
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139837 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 1:19 pm to
Headhunter and big hitter different. Cecil did deliver big hits but he also targeted high most of the time. I think David Fulcher and a Cam collision would be interesting as they're about same size and speed.
This post was edited on 2/7/16 at 1:19 pm
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38003 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Players 30 years ago were pussies compared to now and most of them would get their shite wrecked



Indeed. I am 53 years old so I'm from the "old school". But the difference in size, speed, and power these days gives the "new school" players a HUGE advantage.

Just as an example, John Hannah was one of the best OL in the history of the game and fricking dominated in his era.

John Hannah's playing weight was 265 lbs.

John Hannah would get his shite WRECKED against the elite DL of today's NFL.
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
54802 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

If Newton is running full speed, Romanowski would get trucked



50 50 chance.

Bill was an animal.

6' 4'' 245.

Leverage.

Plus, he has mental illness and steroids.
This post was edited on 2/7/16 at 1:59 pm
Posted by WaltTeevens
Santa Barbara, CA
Member since Dec 2013
10951 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 2:16 pm to
This is a PUSSY LEAGUE now!!!!

Wait...I have to pay my hard earned tax dollars towards broke players dementia healthcare? THAT'S frickING bullshite!!!
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162191 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

You must not have read the '85 Bears 30 for 30 thread. Powerman and SFP think the Texas/USC squads in the '06 BCSCG would wreck the '85 Bears.



Clearly they would

The bears offensive line would get run the frick over

Offensive lineman were just too small back then to compete with today's d lineman
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram