And huge lol at shitting the bed vs the Vikings.
Are we looking at the same game? I'm looking at 3 Romo turnovers and 3 points scored on offense.
A starting QB shouldn't have been holding a FG after leading his team to FG position in the final seconds might I add, vs Seattle.
Doesn't matter. He was supposed to hold the snap as he had done the entire season (IIRC) but dropped the snap to lose the game.
You obviously disregarded everything I said about the Giants in 07.
What? That the Giants went on to beat the undefeated Patriots? What does that have to do with Romo? He had a 50% completion percentage. 200 yds. 1 TD, 1 INT. He didn't play well.
And do I have to remind you what the Redskins did to the Saints last year. We weren't really a playoff team, about as much as the Saints were.
Win that game and you're in the playoffs. 3 picks.
I'm not arguing that he's not a good QB. I would love to have him if we didn't have Brees or the other top guys. But this thread is about Romo being clutch. I'm not seeing it.
This post was edited on 10/10 at 3:09 pm