- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
That Is Why Penalties Should Be Reviewable
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:39 pm
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:39 pm
I really don't care as far as Cowboys butthurt goes, so don't accuse me of that. Take the Cowboys out of the equation if you want
However, that was not subjective, like PI can be. That was a blow to the head. The Vikings deserved another shot at the 2-point conversion. But too many reviews would make the game too long, right?
Right or wrong? But only on penalties like that where you can't touch the QB's head and he hit him on the helmet and facemask.
However, that was not subjective, like PI can be. That was a blow to the head. The Vikings deserved another shot at the 2-point conversion. But too many reviews would make the game too long, right?
Right or wrong? But only on penalties like that where you can't touch the QB's head and he hit him on the helmet and facemask.
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 10:42 pm
11
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:40 pm to lsutigers1992
It didn't affect the play at all. Meh.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:40 pm to lsutigers1992
No just no. I'm already tired of the commercials. That would open a hole can of worms.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:40 pm to lsutigers1992
It wasn't just a blow to the head, it was a facemask as well. Even if you hate the blow to the head rule it still should have been called.
But oh well
Cows win!!!
But oh well
Cows win!!!
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:41 pm to lsutigers1992
Right now, you get 2 challenges, and you get a third one if you win the first two, right?
Why not just give teams 3 challenges no matter what?
ETA: Assuming everything is reviewable
Why not just give teams 3 challenges no matter what?
ETA: Assuming everything is reviewable
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:43 pm to BayouBengals03
I think coaches should be able to challenge non calls, penalties, just about anything. Give them a certain amount per game and if they lose the challenge, they lose TOs / right to make additional challenges etc.
If you are worried about games dragging on there are plenty of ways to speed up these games starting with the double commercials after every TD
If you are worried about games dragging on there are plenty of ways to speed up these games starting with the double commercials after every TD
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:43 pm to lsutigers1992
The left tackle moved before the ball snapped....so if penalties are reviewed, the blow to the head is null since it should have been another false start
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:43 pm to lsutigers1992
How subjective are we going to get though because you could review holding, chop block, block in the back, hands to the face, and blow to the head. Any big play you could get a ref to review the play to look for one of those penalties. You might get the "right" call but it would make football much worse to watch.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:46 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Right now, you get 2 challenges, and you get a third one if you win the first two, right?
You get none inside the 2 minute warning. It's a booth decision.
I remember one time like over a decade ago, the Saints lost a game because they couldn't review. It was a pick-six against the Rams with 2:01 left on the clock. The ball obviously touched the ground. The Saints had a review left but they were not allowed to use it because they used all their timeouts to stop the clock before the 2 minute warning. And the funny thing was that if the play was one second later, it would have been automatically reviewed. Those were the days before all turnover plays had to be reviewed.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:46 pm to KingwoodLsuFan
Just have to draw the line on what can and can't be reviewed on a given play. It's not rocket science
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:46 pm to KingwoodLsuFan
quote:
you could review holding
Holding shouldn't be reviewable.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:48 pm to lsutigers1992
I remember that.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:49 pm to lsutigers1992
Just do like the CFL. Coaches have 2 challenges and they can use them to review PI, late hits, or blows to the QBs head.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:50 pm to KingwoodLsuFan
How about a 5 yard delay of game penalty for an incorrect challenge?
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:52 pm to lsutigers1992
I would be OK with it on plays inside of 2 minutes.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:59 pm to CubsFanBudMan
quote:
How about a 5 yard delay of game penalty for an incorrect challenge?
I think loss of a timeout is a good enough penalty for a lost challenge. Personally I just don't like the idea of reviewing penalties especially weak ones like touching the qb on the head.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 11:20 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Holding shouldn't be reviewable.
I agree. That would fall under "subjective," IMO, and coaches could literally challenge every play.
OBJECTIVE (Reviewable):
Blow to the head
Facemasks
Deflections (for PI calls)
Delay of game
Ineligible player downfield
Neutral zone infractions
Receiver on/not on the line of scrimmage
Did the on-sides kick go 10 yards
NOT REVIEWABLE (objective, or happens too often)
Pass interference
Non-catchable ball
Block in the back (esp on returns)
Late hits
Running into/roughing the kicker
Posted on 12/1/16 at 11:20 pm to lsutigers1992
Refs also missed a false start on the same play.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 11:26 pm to lsutigers1992
I guess you missed the no call when Dak got hit in the head BEFORE he threw a complete pass over the middle.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 11:34 pm to List Eater
Everywhere I go there are people bitching about how soft football has become and how the game is being ruined by these contact rules. Just look at how people told Cam to quit whining.
Now, I am to believe all these idiots in this thread are wanting to review contact plays for "player safety" and not because of butt hurt this one time.
Now, I am to believe all these idiots in this thread are wanting to review contact plays for "player safety" and not because of butt hurt this one time.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News