- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Terrible targeting call in Stanford-UCLA
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:18 pm
defensive player goes low
offensive player lowers his head into the way of the defensive player's head
defensive player is ejected for targeting
offensive player lowers his head into the way of the defensive player's head
defensive player is ejected for targeting
13
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
Just saw that. That's horseshite. How do they expect players to make tackles if the ball carrier drops his head into you?
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
That wasn't why it was called and you know it
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
Agreed.
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:20 pm to sms151t
quote:
That wasn't why it was called and you know it
that's literally what happened
i've argued for years that if the offensive player creates helmet to helmet, he should be ejected
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Was it worse than the UF targeting?
The reason I ask is because it seemed the UF targeting call checked every box for the opposite of what targeting is.
I think someone needs to be sued for this rule.
I'm not joking in the slightest.
The reason I ask is because it seemed the UF targeting call checked every box for the opposite of what targeting is.
I think someone needs to be sued for this rule.
I'm not joking in the slightest.
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
He hit him with the crown of helmet which is why it was called
Speared him
You knew it way rod complained about it so long and the fact he dropped made it easier to see crown.
Speared him
You knew it way rod complained about it so long and the fact he dropped made it easier to see crown.
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
This is off topic but why has stanford used 3 qbs? i just browsed the box score and saw it
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:24 pm to sms151t
If he hit him with the crown of his helmet into his chest he wouldn't have been flagged. He got tossed because the offensive player lowered his head into the defensive players head.
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:26 pm to sms151t
quote:Ok did you see the UF targeting call?
He hit him with the crown of helmet which is why it was called
I feel like the kid has has a footing to sue tf out of the NCAA for making rules and then hiring people to watch unlimited video without being able to know the rules.
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:26 pm to Patton
You can't hit anyone with crown of helmet
May want to know the rule
quote:
No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown (top) of his helmet. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul
May want to know the rule
This post was edited on 9/23/17 at 10:27 pm
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:27 pm to sms151t
You're either trolling or a retard
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:27 pm to sms151t
Like I said. He wouldn't have been flagged if he hit him in the chest. That Happens every weekend in every game multiple times
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:28 pm to ReauxlTide222
I didn't see it but if hit with crown it's targeting. Now how enforced by different crews that's on them not me
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:28 pm to ReauxlTide222
The evolution of football
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:29 pm to Ingeniero
You read the rule? Apparently not
I love how people think every crew enforces same
I love how people think every crew enforces same
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:30 pm to sms151t
quote:
and make forcible contact
They should be sued simply to clarify that lazy arse terminology.
It's fricking football.
Plus the statement has an INCREDIBLY large range of interpretation.
Posted on 9/23/17 at 10:30 pm to sms151t
quote:
You read the rule? Apparently not
So if a tackler is going low and making a legal tackle, but the offensive players lowers their own head into the helmet of the defender, how is that targeting?
The defender is attempting a legal tackle, while the offensive player is causing the helmet to helmet by lowering his own head.
Page 1 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News