Started By
Message

re: Sorta spinoff - the DH in interleague play

Posted on 6/29/15 at 6:08 pm to
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
4497 posts
Posted on 6/29/15 at 6:08 pm to
I wasn't saying i like the DH...just asking the question since it exist.
Posted by Broseph Barksdale
Member since Sep 2010
10571 posts
Posted on 6/29/15 at 6:23 pm to
Hey, let's bring someone in to shoot Shaq's free throws for him.
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27421 posts
Posted on 6/29/15 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

f the NL adopted the DH today, in 30 years, people would be saying "so they used to let the pitchers hit? That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard."

I'm sure if the NL adopted the DH in the 1970's (they almost did), not one single person would care about it today.


I dont think so. Play in the field, bat at the plate. Baseball has some simple yet perfect rules.

The DH was added because the American League was floundering in the 60's and lagging behind the National League.

The NL did not "almost" adopt the DH.
This post was edited on 6/29/15 at 6:27 pm
Posted by thekid
Anna, Tx
Member since May 2006
3937 posts
Posted on 6/29/15 at 8:15 pm to
I always hated the DH until I moved to Dallas...now like others have said I really prefer it to letting pitchers hit...
Pitchers hitting just kills rallies...
Posted by motorbreath
New Orleans Saints fan
Member since Jun 2004
6381 posts
Posted on 6/29/15 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

Pitchers hitting just kills rallies...


More runs =\= better baseball...or maybe the pitcher should spend a little more time in the batting cage.
Posted by Wishnitwas1998
where TN, MS, and AL meet
Member since Oct 2010
58107 posts
Posted on 6/29/15 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

frick the DH
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47471 posts
Posted on 6/30/15 at 9:54 am to
quote:

assuming the hold out owners decide they want to take on extra payroll to pay a guy that only does one thing.


half the roster already does "one thing"
Posted by rlebl39
League City, TX
Member since Jun 2011
4740 posts
Posted on 6/30/15 at 10:03 am to
quote:

More runs =\= better baseball


More runs = more entertaining baseball to casual fans. As an avid baseball fan I do like watching pitching battles, but most fans want to see offense. The sport of baseball is slowly dying amongst todays youth because they say it is boring, the DH puts another real hitter in the lineup that can contribute to more offensive production.

It's only a matter of time until the NL adopts the DH, IMO.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 6/30/15 at 10:49 am to
quote:

The NL did not "almost" adopt the DH.

Yes, they did.

Read up.

ETA: LINK

Olbermann did a thing on it a few weeks ago, too.
This post was edited on 6/30/15 at 10:54 am
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6364 posts
Posted on 6/30/15 at 11:05 am to
quote:

better hitter in the lineup instead of a pitcher batting sub .100.


From fan of the team with half of their regular 9 floating around and under .200.

DH, no DH. I don't really care. The one thing that's clear from this thread is that it's all about what you're used to, not necessarily what is "better" baseball.

I've been a fan of the Red Sox for years, and the Nationals for the last 3 or so, and I don't really notice a difference when watching one vs. the other (not accounting for the utter suckage that has been the Red Sox 2.5 of the last 3.5 years).
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 6/30/15 at 11:08 am to
quote:

half the roster already does "one thing"


so why would they want to add one more player doing only one thing?
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 6/30/15 at 11:10 am to
quote:

The sport of baseball is slowly dying amongst todays youth because they say it is boring, the DH puts another real hitter in the lineup that can contribute to more offensive production.


There aren't that many great hitters out there, now you want to add 15 of them, from where?

But...

quote:

It's only a matter of time until the NL adopts the DH, IMO.


I agree...I dislike it, but I agree.
Posted by rlebl39
League City, TX
Member since Jun 2011
4740 posts
Posted on 6/30/15 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

There aren't that many great hitters out there, now you want to add 15 of them, from where?


Anyone hitting over .200 is a better hitter than probably 93.67% of pitchers.

Obviously I made those numbers up, but the point still stands. Honestly I don't care THAT much about DH or no DH, I just don't understand the point someone made that the DH is ruining the MLB.
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27421 posts
Posted on 6/30/15 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Yes, they did.

Read up.

ETA: LINK

Olbermann did a thing on it a few weeks ago, too.



Meh, The DH wasnt going to be adopted. Thats a fun story that everyone has heard and DH proponents like to bring up but it was never going to be adopted by the NL.

Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 6/30/15 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Thats a fun story that everyone has heard and DH proponents like to bring up but it was never going to be adopted by the NL.

Posted by Rabbs and QStick
Houston
Member since Apr 2012
2823 posts
Posted on 6/30/15 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

I used to hate the DH when the Astros were in the NL. I've gotten used to it now and actually hate it when the Astros play at an NL team and the pitcher has to bat. I don't care to watch a pitcher be a near automatic out anymore.


I'm with you, mainly because Gattis has to play Left Field then. Then again with Singleton up now Gattis is having to play field anyway.
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27421 posts
Posted on 6/30/15 at 1:09 pm to
You can laugh all you want. You honestly think people havent heard that story before?

Why hasnt the NL adopted the DH sparky?
Posted by GarmischTiger
Humboldt County
Member since Mar 2007
6608 posts
Posted on 6/30/15 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

Pitchers batting and running the bases is terrible to watch and puts them at unnecessary risk of injury while batting or running.
I like pitchers batting because of this - they're on equal footing with all other players.

Batting also makes National League pitchers accountable for any stupid sh*t they do on the mound.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 6/30/15 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

You can laugh all you want. You honestly think people havent heard that story before?

Why hasnt the NL adopted the DH sparky?

I'm sure a lot of people have. And I'm sure a lot of people haven't.

I'm just laughing at your stubbornness.

One vote short. And if all the votes were cast, then it would have passed. I would call that consideration, at the very least. And that it did almost happen.

You can tell yourself whatever you'd like. Really doesn't matter to me.
Posted by Breric
Member since Oct 2007
517 posts
Posted on 6/30/15 at 1:42 pm to
My solution would be to just let the 8 fielders hit.

Why do they need exactly 9 hitters, other than to appease people's OCD?

I don't like the idea of somebody being a lifetime DH and can understand not wanting to see pitchers hit.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram