menu
Posted by
Message
undecided
Auburn Fan
It's A New Day Blvd
Member since May 2012
14085 posts

Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?

Posted this on the SECr yesterday but no one paid attention, so thought I would give it a try on the MSB

Pro-sports attendance in down across the board and yet CFB new system will expect fans to travel during the regular season and to several different sites for playoffs thus taking revenue away from the Universities and the cities/states that they are located in.

Take Alabama for example. What would the economic impact be for Tuscaloosa and Auburn if both were in the playoffs? According to this article from July 2012, Alabama and Auburn had an estimated economic impact of 500 million in 2011. Why let the additional revenue of on-campus playoffs completely leave one of the poorest states in the country?

If the Universities were unwilling to advocate for on-campus playoffs, why didn’t the local and state governments intercede? Would you have supported their efforts if they had?


crimsonian
Alabama Fan
Florida
Member since Jun 2012
6480 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
I agree, but Bama and AU won't be in the playoffs together. Unless there is a schedule change.


SlowFlowPro
Stanford Fan
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
311368 posts
Online

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
this is a ticking time bomb of inequality that would materialize and the admins know it

there is a huge divide in budgets of the haves and have nots

within the haves, you'll see a further divide in budgets

just think about how much more money bama would have made compared to the rest of the SEC the past 4 years


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
JJ27
TCU Fan
Member since Sep 2004
49501 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
Eventually but not at first. The bowls and host cities would have thrown an even bigger shitfit if they lost the revenue. Easier to establish playoffs before taking away the games.


undecided
Auburn Fan
It's A New Day Blvd
Member since May 2012
14085 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
quote:

Eventually but not at first. The bowls and host cities would have thrown an even bigger shitfit if they lost the revenue. Easier to establish playoffs before taking away the games.

Compromise would be to use the on-campus playoffs to seed the Bowl games that way everybody makes money. Schools are currenly being shafted for Bowl games in having to buy tickets, travel expenses, ect. The only people currenly profitting are the Bowls.

I also think this argument could be made for the empty B-ball tournements that are held. It looks awful on tv and it seems like an even bigger waste of money


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
undecided
Auburn Fan
It's A New Day Blvd
Member since May 2012
14085 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
quote:

but Bama and AU won't be in the playoffs together

The same way LSU and Bama wouldnt play each other twice in would season? Anything is possible.


TJG210
LSU Fan
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
23336 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
On campus playoffs are the only thing that makes sense.......seriously, how many people will attend a playoff game, only to turn around the following week and travel to the championship destination?

So theoretically you could have LSU traveling to Miami, winning that game, and then playing in Los Angeles the following week for the championship.

If you took your family to the game, you could easily be looking at $10K+ to do this.

I know some fans will attend both, but you could be looking at more empty stadiums like what is currently happening with the BCS games.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
usc6158
Southern Cal Fan
Member since Feb 2008
24245 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
What happen when a team like Oregon St ends up hosting a playoff game in a 45K seat stadium? That's a ton of revenue left on the table for everyone involved. '

I doubt you'll have attendance issues at all for the playoff games. There's certainly no chance that it will be worse than some of the current BCS games.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
Bunk Moreland
Michigan Fan
Detroit, MI.
Member since Dec 2010
9420 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
I think the Pac 12 game is hosted/run by the conference and they divide up that cash. I wish they could do it like that. I am all for on-campus in the first round of 4/8. So some cities get a bigger economic benefit than others. Big deal. That said, there would be some serious monkey business for seeding, but you're going to have that for the selection process,anyway.

On edit, once the TV cash rolls in, I don't think anyone will care much about empty stadiums.
This post was edited on 1/4 at 9:06 am


SlowFlowPro
Stanford Fan
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
311368 posts
Online

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
i'm still wondering how they're going to divide up the playoff money. i don't think it's been set yet (i could be wrong)


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
lsuhunt555
Furman Fan
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
24492 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
Doesnt matter, there is too much money in CFB right now and the people who have access to it and the people who make it will never let this shite happen.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
crimsonian
Alabama Fan
Florida
Member since Jun 2012
6480 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
Bama and LSU didn't play in the last game of the regular season. Not going to happen with 4 playoff teams.


Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
4427 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
quote:

Bama and LSU didn't play in the last game of the regular season. Not going to happen with 4 playoff teams


The Iron Bowl loser may be the top one loss team in the country.


undecided
Auburn Fan
It's A New Day Blvd
Member since May 2012
14085 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
quote:

The Iron Bowl loser may be the top one loss team in the country.

This

Also the 45,000 on-campus stadium argument is void when you consider that may be the amount of people that show up for the playoff games in places like L.A., Miami, and Glendale which are unaffordable for the average fan especially within the same month.

My arguement is, why would I want Auburn to generate millions of dollars in revenue for New Orleans when I can keep that money in Auburn and the surrounding areas?


SlowFlowPro
Stanford Fan
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
311368 posts
Online

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
quote:

My arguement is, why would I want Auburn to generate millions of dollars in revenue for New Orleans when I can keep that money in Auburn and the surrounding areas?

on the flip side, why would a team from your conference not in the playoffs want to give you an extra home game's revenue?


undecided
Auburn Fan
It's A New Day Blvd
Member since May 2012
14085 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
quote:

on the flip side, why would a team from your conference not in the playoffs want to give you an extra home game's revenue?

That's kinda a moot point if those teams fail to make the playoff. Win and your in

Furthermore, still using Auburn as an example, our proximity to Georgia means that some people would stay in Columbus or some in Montgomery. Also, I'm sure Birmingham and Atlanta would benefit from people flying in from the visiting school. This extends the economic impact across state lines.


SlowFlowPro
Stanford Fan
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
311368 posts
Online

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
quote:

That's kinda a moot point if those teams fail to make the playoff. Win and your in

not really. it's a very big issue that may allow the rich to get richer

if we're talking Bama/LSU/UF then it's a "wait for your year" thing but what about Arky/UTenn/Auburn, who will struggle to win a title anytime soon? they're going to just get further and further behind in revenue



hehateme2285
LSU Fan
Katy, TX
Member since Dec 2007
3449 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
When it goes above 4 teams, the first round will be on campus


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
undecided
Auburn Fan
It's A New Day Blvd
Member since May 2012
14085 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
quote:

if we're talking Bama/LSU/UF then it's a "wait for your year" thing but what about Arky/UTenn/Auburn, who will struggle to win a title anytime soon? they're going to just get further and further behind in revenue

Auburn has 2 undefeated season, 2 SEC championships, 1 NC, and 1 Heisman winner within the last 10 years. Seems like we're doing okay

This system would probably benefit the smaller schools the most because they are getting revenue and exposure on a national stage
This post was edited on 1/4 at 10:13 am


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
crimsonian
Alabama Fan
Florida
Member since Jun 2012
6480 posts

re: Should Local & State Reps Have Lobbied for On-Campus CFB Playoffs?
Please tell me the last time going into the bowl season that Bama and AU were in the top 4. I will hang up and listen.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2next pagelast page

Back to top

logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram