Started By
Message

OKC is not a good place for a NBA team

Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:03 pm
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10666 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:03 pm
Why the NBA allowed the sonics to leave is tragic. Seattle is a great city and it was the only winter sport in town. Oklahoma City is not NBA quality for the lifestyle that professional athletes want and need.NBA players want to be in a quality city and it has to do with more than weather.

If you're a basketball player there are a lot more cities that offer things pro basketball players want. What is there in Oklahoma City? Even New Orleans has things that make it attractive to NBA players. Even Detroit as home to Motown and the largest black city in America offers things that a Oklahoma City cannot. Minneapolis though pretty white was home to Prince and offers a more diverse and culturally appropriate venue for ball players. Milwaukee is borderline acceptable but Kareem left. Cleveland is a better city than Oklahoma City.

Any larger Northeastern and Midwestern city like Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Minneapolis offers more than OKC.
This post was edited on 7/4/16 at 6:04 pm
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46505 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:04 pm to
Oklahoma City isn't a good place for anything
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
28255 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

Cleveland is a better city than Oklahoma City.


Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:10 pm to
It was a weird move.

Seattle has a population the same as OKC but OKC is not nearly as affluent.

They seem to have great fans and they will rally around their team and their remaining A lister with KD leaving but long term, it's gonna end up being a shitty franchise.

They are just gonna draft players and lose them as soon as they are unrestricted like so many other franchises.

This post was edited on 7/4/16 at 6:32 pm
Posted by Kramer26
St. George, LA
Member since Jan 2005
6397 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:12 pm to
Let's see if they keep showing up after a losing season with no superstar on the roster.
Posted by airfernando
Member since Oct 2015
15248 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

athletes want and need.
You must not know what "need" means.
Posted by theducks
Where The Blazers Play
Member since Aug 2013
13697 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:13 pm to
Probably not
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36398 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:14 pm to
Yea I'm sure free agents decide where to go on what musicians originated from the city. Shut up.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
35308 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

Seattle has a metro population the same as OKC but OKC is not nearly as affluent.



Seattle is way bigger than OKC. It's not even close.
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139837 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:21 pm to
OKC is better than NOLA and Sacramento for NBA teams.

They support the team. You may not like how they got a team, but it was inevitable after how they embraced the Hornets after Katrina.
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:21 pm to
quote:




Seattle is way bigger than OKC. It's not even close.


2010 census had Seattle at 608,000 and OKC at 610,000.

Is that close?
This post was edited on 7/4/16 at 6:32 pm
Posted by AlabamaAlum07
Member since Jun 2014
2027 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:22 pm to
Not to mention that Seattle is part of the #14 media market while OKC is #45. They're basically the Jacksonville Jaguars of the NBA.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
35308 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

2010 census had Seattle at 608,000 and OKC at 610,000.

Is that close?




For the city itself, which is pretty irrelevant.

Metro area is not close. 3.3M vs. 1.2M in 2010
Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
28714 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

Seattle is way bigger than OKC. It's not even close.


That surprised me when he said that. Was about to go look that up.
Posted by AlabamaAlum07
Member since Jun 2014
2027 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

For the city itself, which is pretty irrelevant.

Exactly. Jacksonville has more people than San Fran.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36398 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:27 pm to
If okc had won the finals a few years ago would you still be saying it's not a good place for a team? Seriously such a stupid post.
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:30 pm to
When I'm wrong, I say I am wrong. Seattle does double up OKC with adjoining municipalities factored in.
Posted by LSUJuicer
Member since Jan 2013
3348 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:30 pm to
As a sonics fan I love KD leaving! They are just another Memphis now. Made some.noise but they are slowing disappearing from the NBA scene. Could not have happened to a better owner. Took out team now enjoy sucking until some other Oklahoma product becomes a big NBA player. Nobody wants to play there!
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27421 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:31 pm to
Thats not the metro area.

Seattle metro has about the same population as the entire state of Oklahoma.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112552 posts
Posted on 7/4/16 at 6:32 pm to
San Antonio is home to the most successful NBA franchise of the last two decades. Sit down.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram