Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

NFL explains personal foul confusion at the end of Giants/Saints game

Posted on 11/4/15 at 7:57 am
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77524 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 7:57 am
LINK

quote:

According to NFL spokesman Michael Signora, after the officials correctly threw the flag on punter Brad Wing for grabbing the facemask of Willie Snead, they changed their minds and decided there would be no penalty because the play actually ended when the return man, Marcus Murphy, fumbled forward.

However, after a further discussion, the officials realized that, as an NFL spokesman confirmed on Sunday, “A personal foul cannot be ignored and must be enforced.” That’s when they re-instated the 15-yard penalty that set up Kai Forbath’s game-winning, 50-yard field goal.


quote:

Tom Coughlin was incensed that he “couldn’t get a word” out of the officials when he went looking for an explanation. In the end, though, the officials did get the call right.

“The flag was thrown by the umpire immediately for a facemask against New York,” Signora said in an email to the Daily News. “The officials conferenced and that discussion centered around the fact that because the play was dead when New Orleans recovered the fumble, there would be no penalty. After the initial announcement to that effect – that there would be no penalty – the officials further discussed the penalty and correctly determined that because it was a personal foul, it must be enforced.”



Was going to post on the Saints board but I remembered a thread or two on this subject here.
Posted by Spilled Milk
Member since Mar 2015
1075 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 8:02 am to
Holy shite, are these officials serious? This scenario pops up at least once a week
This post was edited on 11/4/15 at 8:04 am
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77524 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 8:04 am to
They got it right is the important thing. Lot of stuff happening and a call like that can (and did) decide the outcome of the game. Make sure you made the right call.
Posted by Spilled Milk
Member since Mar 2015
1075 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 8:11 am to
I understand they got it right, but who decided that a personal foul doesn't get tacked on in the first place? Even my wife knows personal fouls never get picked up
Posted by SoFresh
New Orleans
Member since May 2010
3068 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 9:17 am to
Bunch of clowns. We need some replacement refs
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
165968 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 9:20 am to
still begs the question:

Murphy fumbles ball forward
Still live ball
Snead recovers ball not down

is this a dead ball or does snead need to be brought to the ground before its a dead ball?
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77524 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 9:34 am to
Someone posted on ST about you can't advance a fumble under 2 minutes left? So I guess that means it's dead once someone establishes possession?


I want to say that's not an actual rule, but maybe I'm wrong. Or maybe it just applies on punts? None of that sounds right.
Posted by STB
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2012
1087 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 9:36 am to
Hopefully we make the rule book longer so we can get some clear explanations.
Posted by LSUSoulja08
Member since Oct 2007
16969 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 9:39 am to
quote:

I want to say that's not an actual rule


they said it was a rule during the broadcast.


It is an official rule, it's just new is where the confusion comes in I believe because I think they said it was either put in place this past offseason or the previous offseason.
This post was edited on 11/4/15 at 9:40 am
Posted by LSUSoulja08
Member since Oct 2007
16969 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 9:41 am to
quote:

still begs the question:

Murphy fumbles ball forward
Still live ball
Snead recovers ball not down

is this a dead ball or does snead need to be brought to the ground before its a dead ball?



it doesn't beg the question at all. Once a saint established possession after the fumble, the play is dead. Simple as that.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77524 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 9:42 am to
And it must be an NFL rule only when you think about the Michigan State/Michigan game, or was that rule a blocked punt?
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 9:45 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/7/16 at 8:22 pm
Posted by Grit-Eating Shin
You're an Idiot
Member since May 2013
8431 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 9:56 am to
quote:

is this a dead ball or does snead need to be brought to the ground before its a dead ball?
I know that there is a rule that you can't advance a muffed punt or kick, so I'm assuming that applies to the return, as well. I believe there is a similar rule on offense. My guess is that this is to prevent football from resembling rugby. Otherwise, you could strategically fumble the ball when getting tackled, only to have a speedy receiver scoop it up and take it to the house.
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22381 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 9:59 am to
quote:

And it must be an NFL rule only when you think about the Michigan State/Michigan game, or was that rule a blocked punt?



You dont understand the difference between an offensive player advancing a fumbled ball and a defensive player returning a fumbled ball?
Posted by chrisharrisbaby
Member since Mar 2014
679 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 10:01 am to
quote:

quote:
still begs the question:

Murphy fumbles ball forward
Still live ball
Snead recovers ball not down

is this a dead ball or does snead need to be brought to the ground before its a dead ball?


it doesn't beg the question at all. Once a saint established possession after the fumble, the play is dead. Simple as that.


I think the issue is if Snead recovers and he possibly fumbles. If he fumbles and possession change do they allow it?

Also we have seen them review certain plays like illegal hits that occurred during turnovers but were reversed. They still enforce the penalty.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112166 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 10:05 am to
That referee/ Aaron Rodgers commercial seems to be truer to life than we thought
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77524 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 10:20 am to
quote:

You dont understand the difference between an offensive player advancing a fumbled ball and a defensive player returning a fumbled ball?



So the distinction is between offensive and defensive player? OK. That clarifies that then.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48790 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 10:33 am to
Under their original pretense you couldn't call a PF on a late hit out of bounds

Posted by SuperSoakher
Member since Jun 2012
4585 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:51 am to
quote:

I know that there is a rule that you can't advance a muffed punt or kick, so I'm assuming that applies to the return, as well.


What if Snead recovers it and instead of advancing it runs backwards? Is it still a dead ball?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram