Started By
Message

re: NBA has voted "NO" to Relocation of Sacramento Kings

Posted on 4/29/13 at 5:02 pm to
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94615 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

Dump the cap and institute full revenue sharing across the board and that can be mitigated.


If they start counting teams' local TV contracts into that revenue, we'll talk.

The TV contracts that teams like the Lake Show and Knicks have are insane and gives them a greater margin for error when overpaying for talent.
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123558 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 5:05 pm to
Give Seattle an expansion team and send New Orleans back to the Eastern Conference.
Posted by shuke33
Under The Bridge
Member since Nov 2010
9052 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 5:16 pm to
That's too logical for NBA owners.
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 6:32 pm to
I guess Seattle has deer in the area right?


Cause that's the franchise heading west fwiw
Posted by The7Sins
Truth or Consequences, New Mexico
Member since Nov 2012
1178 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 6:46 pm to
If they go for an expansion honestly they should go by +6. One new team for each division.

Southeast = Move Memphis to here.
Southwest = + Albuquerque and Kansas City (or Saint Louis)
Northwest = + Seattle
Pacific = + Vancouver
Central + Columbus (or Saint Louis)
Atlantic = + Montreal
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 7:02 pm to
Suck it one more time Seattle!
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

The owner of the thunder who pushed to move the sonics is part of the committee. That should not have happened.


If anything I could see Bennett pushing for Seattle to get the Kings to get all those idiots off his back.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58028 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 7:44 pm to
quote:



If they start counting teams' local TV contracts into that revenue, we'll talk.

The TV contracts that teams like the Lake Show and Knicks have are insane and gives them a greater margin for error when overpaying for talent.



I absolutely want to count local TV contracts into that.

No real point in having a cap if teams with big arse TV deals can circumvent it.
Posted by SpartyGator
Detroit Lions fan
Member since Oct 2011
75312 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 8:04 pm to
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
163983 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 8:22 pm to
How many freaking teams do you want to add to a watered down NBA?
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
76624 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

What is a reasonable number of teams to have before quality of play falls off dramatically?


See, that's the thing. If the NBA would lift the amount (500K, I believe) they allow teams to pay to buy/buyout overseas contracts, the depth of the league would improve to support two more teams and then some. Seattle, Kansas City, Pittsburgh and Las Vegas would be strong NBA markets.
Posted by lsu223
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
2133 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

Or the Dallas Stars.

Gagliardi has to be sick to his stomach right about now.


I don't think Gagliardi has ever intended to relocate the Stars.
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19306 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

I don't think Gagliardi has ever intended to relocate the Stars.


They have no fan base in Dallas. I go to games and 30-40% of the fans are wearing the other teams' gear. You can't sustain a franchise with that lack of support.

Gagliardi knew he couldn't do what Phoenix did and spout off at the mouth, or else the NHL would put the squash on it.
Posted by GumBro Jackson
Raleigh
Member since Mar 2011
3111 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 10:08 pm to
I think the NBA did the right thing. Sacramento has been a good market for the team for most of the last 25 years. They had a group that wanted to keep the team in its location, and I feel that the default should always be to keep a team where it is.

Clearly Seattle got screwed with the move to OKC, but that doesn't mean the right move now is to screw Sacramento.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34538 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 10:54 pm to
Do the Kings still play in that 'temporary' building they occupied when they moved into Sacramento?
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
87331 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 11:14 pm to
The move will be the bucks
NBA doesn't want to expand because they don't want another cut of the tv money
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12308 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 11:17 pm to
The Seattle group released a statement. They aren't giving up. LINK
quote:

While we are disappointed with the relocation committee’s recommendation, we just wanted to let you all know that we remain fully committed to seeing this transaction through. As you are all well aware, we have a binding transaction to purchase the Kings for what would be a record price for an NBA franchise, have one of the best ownership groups ever assembled to purchase a professional sports team in the US, have clearly demonstrated that we have a much more solid Arena plan, have offered a much higher price than the yet to be finalized Sacramento Group, and have placed all of the funds to close the transaction into escrow. As such, we plan to unequivocally state our case for both relocation and our plan to move forward with the transaction to the league and owners at the upcoming Board of Governor’s Meeting in Mid-May.

When we started this process everyone thought it was impossible. While this represents yet another obstacle to achieving our goal, I just wanted to reassure all of you that we have numerous options at our disposal and have absolutely no plans to give up. Impossible is nothing but a state of mind.

“Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they've been given than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration. It's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing.” ?Muhammad Ali
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71423 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

Southeast = Move Memphis to here.
Southwest = + Albuquerque and Kansas City (or Saint Louis)
Northwest = + Seattle
Pacific = + Vancouver
Central + Columbus (or Saint Louis)
Atlantic = + Montreal

3 Canadian teams?
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
87331 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 11:20 pm to
Part of this is stern will try to delay it, retire and then Adam silver will over see a relocation and be the bad guy
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12308 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

Part of this is stern will try to delay it, retire and then Adam silver will over see a relocation and be the bad guy


Don't think they can delay the sale that long. The Maloofs want their money.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram