- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
MLB to Experiment with New Extra Innings Idea in Minor Leagues
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:31 pm
quote:
Major League Baseball plans on testing a rule change in the lowest levels of the minor leagues this season that automatically would place a runner on second base at the start of extra innings, a distinct break from the game’s orthodoxy that nonetheless has wide-ranging support at the highest levels of the league, sources familiar with the plan told Yahoo Sports.
A derivation of the rule has been used in international baseball for nearly a decade and will be implemented in the World Baseball Classic this spring. MLB’s desire to test it in the rookie-level Gulf Coast League and Arizona League this summer is part of an effort to understand its wide in-game consequences – and whether its implementation at higher levels, and even the major leagues, may be warranted.
“Let’s see what it looks like,” said Joe Torre, the longtime major league manager who’s now MLB’s Chief Baseball Officer and a strong proponent of the testing. “It’s not fun to watch when you go through your whole pitching staff and wind up bringing a utility infielder in to pitch. As much as it’s nice to talk about being at an 18-inning game, it takes time.
“It’s baseball. I’m just trying to get back to that, where this is the game that people come to watch. It doesn’t mean you’re going to score. You’re just trying to play baseball.”
While the specifics of the rule are not final, the current plan is to start with a runner on second base in the 10th and every inning thereafter. As baseball grapples with ways to increase action in a game with a record-low rate of balls in play, changing its extra-innings rules emerged as a solution with multiple potential benefits.
In addition to the increase in action a forced runner would create, so too would a philosophical element enter the game: to bunt or not to bunt. The other advantages are not quite as Shakespearean but certainly pragmatic. Amid concern about fatigue and travel, the presumption of shorter games with the new rules could save players from the rigors of extra-innings affairs that slog into the night. Further, the taxation on young arms – especially those in the minor leagues – would be mitigated.
“What really initiated it is sitting in the dugout in the 15th inning and realizing everybody is going to the plate trying to hit a home run and everyone is trying to end the game themselves,” Torre said. “I don’t know what inning is the right inning. Maybe the 11th or 12th inning. But there are a number of reasons.”
The minor leagues are typically MLB’s testing ground for potential rule changes, and as commissioner Rob Manfred focuses on pace-of-play issues, the prospect of extra innings with more action is appealing. The possibility of playing under different rules in extra innings – both the NFL and NHL do so in their overtime periods – is real enough that MLB sought feedback from both its playing rules and competition committees this offseason, according to sources.
Even if it is a success, it would likely take years for the major leagues to adopt the changes. The strategy of implementing rules in the minor leagues, which MLB can do without the players’ approval, is canny: Once those players graduate to the major leagues, their familiarity with them – such as a pitch clock, which currently is in place in the minors – would allow easier adoption.
LINK
This is as fricking stupid as ballsuckers NFL overtime proposal.
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 7:32 pm
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:33 pm to TideSaint
Jesus christ this sounds awful
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:34 pm to TideSaint
Did Brian France purchase MLB?
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 7:35 pm
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:41 pm to WestCoastAg
Yeah, this is a dumb idea
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:42 pm to TideSaint
Might be a good idea for regular season but I wouldn't like it for playoffs. Kinda like how NHL has 3 on 3 (and shootout) for OT for regular season but normal 5 on 5 OT in the playoffs. That could work. I think I'd prefer a runner on first though rather than a runner already in scoring position.
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:44 pm to TideSaint
Who is the base runner? A pinch runner? Someone off the bench?
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:54 pm to TideSaint
Stupid. You can script exactly how the inning will go. The first batter will attempt to bunt the runner to 3rd. Followed by the pitching team intentionally walking the next batter to set up a double play. I mean we know that's how it plays out following a lead off double but I don't like the idea of scripting the inning for the sake of speeding things up vs letting it play out organically.
While we're on the subject of MLB rule changes, I read they other day that the rules committee is considering eliminating the 4 pitch intentional walk and instead going with an intentional walk signal and the runner going directly to 1st. Terrible idea IMO.
While we're on the subject of MLB rule changes, I read they other day that the rules committee is considering eliminating the 4 pitch intentional walk and instead going with an intentional walk signal and the runner going directly to 1st. Terrible idea IMO.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:03 pm to Lsuhoohoo
quote:
While we're on the subject of MLB rule changes, I read they other day that the rules committee is considering eliminating the 4 pitch intentional walk and instead going with an intentional walk signal and the runner going directly to 1st. Terrible idea IMO.
This will happen in 2017. How is this terrible? It's an absolute waste of time to watch a pitcher lob 4 80 mph balls to a standing catcher.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:15 pm to FulshearTiger
Because 4 easily catchable pitches isn't a guarantee.
LINK
I've seen runs score on wild intentional walk pitches, I've seen teams decide to nix the intentional walk mid AB, I've seen pitches float back over the plate and the batter gets a hit off them.
LINK
I've seen runs score on wild intentional walk pitches, I've seen teams decide to nix the intentional walk mid AB, I've seen pitches float back over the plate and the batter gets a hit off them.
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:20 pm to TideSaint
What the frick is this shite
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:20 pm to TideSaint
Holy shite I would never watch another game if that bullshite became a thing. That is the dumbest fricking thing I've read in quite some time. Who came up with this?
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:21 pm to TideSaint
So it will go from everyone swinging for the fence to no one swinging for the fence.
Chicks dig the Sac... Fly?
Chicks dig the Sac... Fly?
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:21 pm to Lsuhoohoo
quote:what a fricking joke. Who is coming up with all this bullshite??
While we're on the subject of MLB rule changes, I read they other day that the rules committee is considering eliminating the 4 pitch intentional walk and instead going with an intentional walk signal and the runner going directly to 1st. Terrible idea IMO.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:22 pm to TideSaint
Totally fine with it in the regular season, except I would only start it from the 12th inning on.
Not in the playoffs.
Not in the playoffs.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:28 pm to Lsuhoohoo
You've seen maybe all of those things one time.
And when the hell did you ever see someone "change their mind". I don't believe you on that one.
And when the hell did you ever see someone "change their mind". I don't believe you on that one.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News