Started By
Message

MLB to Experiment with New Extra Innings Idea in Minor Leagues

Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:31 pm
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
75823 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:31 pm
quote:

Major League Baseball plans on testing a rule change in the lowest levels of the minor leagues this season that automatically would place a runner on second base at the start of extra innings, a distinct break from the game’s orthodoxy that nonetheless has wide-ranging support at the highest levels of the league, sources familiar with the plan told Yahoo Sports.

A derivation of the rule has been used in international baseball for nearly a decade and will be implemented in the World Baseball Classic this spring. MLB’s desire to test it in the rookie-level Gulf Coast League and Arizona League this summer is part of an effort to understand its wide in-game consequences – and whether its implementation at higher levels, and even the major leagues, may be warranted.

“Let’s see what it looks like,” said Joe Torre, the longtime major league manager who’s now MLB’s Chief Baseball Officer and a strong proponent of the testing. “It’s not fun to watch when you go through your whole pitching staff and wind up bringing a utility infielder in to pitch. As much as it’s nice to talk about being at an 18-inning game, it takes time.

“It’s baseball. I’m just trying to get back to that, where this is the game that people come to watch. It doesn’t mean you’re going to score. You’re just trying to play baseball.”

While the specifics of the rule are not final, the current plan is to start with a runner on second base in the 10th and every inning thereafter. As baseball grapples with ways to increase action in a game with a record-low rate of balls in play, changing its extra-innings rules emerged as a solution with multiple potential benefits.

In addition to the increase in action a forced runner would create, so too would a philosophical element enter the game: to bunt or not to bunt. The other advantages are not quite as Shakespearean but certainly pragmatic. Amid concern about fatigue and travel, the presumption of shorter games with the new rules could save players from the rigors of extra-innings affairs that slog into the night. Further, the taxation on young arms – especially those in the minor leagues – would be mitigated.

“What really initiated it is sitting in the dugout in the 15th inning and realizing everybody is going to the plate trying to hit a home run and everyone is trying to end the game themselves,” Torre said. “I don’t know what inning is the right inning. Maybe the 11th or 12th inning. But there are a number of reasons.”

The minor leagues are typically MLB’s testing ground for potential rule changes, and as commissioner Rob Manfred focuses on pace-of-play issues, the prospect of extra innings with more action is appealing. The possibility of playing under different rules in extra innings – both the NFL and NHL do so in their overtime periods – is real enough that MLB sought feedback from both its playing rules and competition committees this offseason, according to sources.

Even if it is a success, it would likely take years for the major leagues to adopt the changes. The strategy of implementing rules in the minor leagues, which MLB can do without the players’ approval, is canny: Once those players graduate to the major leagues, their familiarity with them – such as a pitch clock, which currently is in place in the minors – would allow easier adoption.




LINK

This is as fricking stupid as ballsuckers NFL overtime proposal.
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 7:32 pm
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
144958 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:33 pm to
Jesus christ this sounds awful
Posted by Yellerhammer5
Member since Oct 2012
10850 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:34 pm to
Did Brian France purchase MLB?
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 7:35 pm
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123560 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:37 pm to
XLB
Posted by Dodd
Member since Oct 2003
21048 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:39 pm to
Tball California rules...
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
22836 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:39 pm to
This fricking sucks
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15761 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:39 pm to
Going to see a lot bunts
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:41 pm to
Yeah, this is a dumb idea
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36156 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:42 pm to
Might be a good idea for regular season but I wouldn't like it for playoffs. Kinda like how NHL has 3 on 3 (and shootout) for OT for regular season but normal 5 on 5 OT in the playoffs. That could work. I think I'd prefer a runner on first though rather than a runner already in scoring position.
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 7:45 pm
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:44 pm to
Who is the base runner? A pinch runner? Someone off the bench?
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94294 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:54 pm to
Stupid. You can script exactly how the inning will go. The first batter will attempt to bunt the runner to 3rd. Followed by the pitching team intentionally walking the next batter to set up a double play. I mean we know that's how it plays out following a lead off double but I don't like the idea of scripting the inning for the sake of speeding things up vs letting it play out organically.


While we're on the subject of MLB rule changes, I read they other day that the rules committee is considering eliminating the 4 pitch intentional walk and instead going with an intentional walk signal and the runner going directly to 1st. Terrible idea IMO.
Posted by FulshearTiger
Member since Jul 2015
5274 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

While we're on the subject of MLB rule changes, I read they other day that the rules committee is considering eliminating the 4 pitch intentional walk and instead going with an intentional walk signal and the runner going directly to 1st. Terrible idea IMO.


This will happen in 2017. How is this terrible? It's an absolute waste of time to watch a pitcher lob 4 80 mph balls to a standing catcher.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60090 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:06 pm to
Lol what
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94294 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:15 pm to
Because 4 easily catchable pitches isn't a guarantee.

LINK

I've seen runs score on wild intentional walk pitches, I've seen teams decide to nix the intentional walk mid AB, I've seen pitches float back over the plate and the batter gets a hit off them.
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 8:19 pm
Posted by BCMCubs
Colorado
Member since Nov 2011
22146 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:20 pm to
What the frick is this shite
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
34593 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:20 pm to
Holy shite I would never watch another game if that bullshite became a thing. That is the dumbest fricking thing I've read in quite some time. Who came up with this?
Posted by bayoucracka
Member since Sep 2015
6804 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:21 pm to
So it will go from everyone swinging for the fence to no one swinging for the fence.

Chicks dig the Sac... Fly?
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
34593 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

While we're on the subject of MLB rule changes, I read they other day that the rules committee is considering eliminating the 4 pitch intentional walk and instead going with an intentional walk signal and the runner going directly to 1st. Terrible idea IMO.
what a fricking joke. Who is coming up with all this bullshite??
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:22 pm to
Totally fine with it in the regular season, except I would only start it from the 12th inning on.

Not in the playoffs.
Posted by FulshearTiger
Member since Jul 2015
5274 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:28 pm to
You've seen maybe all of those things one time.

And when the hell did you ever see someone "change their mind". I don't believe you on that one.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram