- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Lions agree to deal with Curry pending Stafford decision
Posted on 4/22/09 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 4/22/09 at 7:38 pm
Looks like they have agreed with Curry just in case Stafford doesn't accept the deal on the table for him.
LINK
LINK
2
Posted on 4/22/09 at 7:39 pm to someoldhussy
Could it just be more posturing to get Stafford's number down?
If they do take Curry, how far could Stafford/Sanchez fall?
If they do take Curry, how far could Stafford/Sanchez fall?
Posted on 4/22/09 at 7:42 pm to The Easter Bunny
Stafford to 4 with Seahawks I think.
Sanchez not so sure
Sanchez not so sure
Posted on 4/22/09 at 7:44 pm to The Easter Bunny
I think regardless of the situation Sanchez doesn't get past 8-9, somebody will trade up to get him.
eta: I also don't know if another LB is a luxury the Lions can really afford, I think you just take Smith and see if Culpepper is any good, because you're going to be picking real high again next year no matter what and you can get a QB then.
eta: I also don't know if another LB is a luxury the Lions can really afford, I think you just take Smith and see if Culpepper is any good, because you're going to be picking real high again next year no matter what and you can get a QB then.
This post was edited on 4/22/09 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 4/22/09 at 7:44 pm to someoldhussy
They should be taking Curry anyway. A more complete and better player you will not find in this draft.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 7:45 pm to Roughneck
quote:
A more complete and better player you will not find in this draft.
Jason Smith disagrees
/honestly though I would put Curry and Smith at 1a and 1b.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 7:48 pm to tigerguy121
as a player, curry >>>>>>> smith
smith just plays a much more valuable position
smith just plays a much more valuable position
Posted on 4/22/09 at 7:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
as a player, curry >>>>>>> smith
You don't think Smith has the potential to be an elite LT in this league?
I think he is much better than Jake Long last year
Posted on 4/22/09 at 7:52 pm to tigerguy121
quote:
You don't think Smith has the potential to be an elite LT in this league?
he's not an elite LT prospect in a good year, and i was speaking in terms of being a player
quote:
I think he is much better than Jake Long last year
he's got more potential than long
Posted on 4/22/09 at 7:57 pm to tigerguy121
quote:
I think he is much better than Jake Long last year
People forget Jake Long gave up one sack his college career. That was to a first round pick.
Jason Smith isn't on that level.
Curry>Smith
LT>>>>OLB
Posted on 4/22/09 at 8:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
smith has as much potential as any LT prospect in a while
Posted on 4/22/09 at 8:04 pm to LSUtigahs28
Jake Long was such a good LT prospect people kept saying that he would probably make an even better RT.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 8:05 pm to LSUtigahs28
plus Curry is an OLB that doesnt even rush the passer
Posted on 4/22/09 at 8:06 pm to tigerguy121
quote:
Jake Long was such a good LT prospect people kept saying that he would probably make an even better RT.
TV analysts did. Bill Parcells knew a little bit more about it though.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 8:07 pm to Maximus
quote:
plus Curry is an OLB that doesnt even rush the passer
I should clarify that
3-4 Rush OLB is a franchise position too.
4-3 OLB is not.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 8:08 pm to LSUtigahs28
quote:
3-4 Rush OLB is a franchise position too.
franchise position?
really?
Posted on 4/22/09 at 8:10 pm to DBG
I'd say those freak pass rushers like merriman and ware are definitely in that category
Posted on 4/22/09 at 8:11 pm to BilJ
maybe so
but i'd rank it last behind QB, LT, and maybe CB as far as franchise positions go
but i'd rank it last behind QB, LT, and maybe CB as far as franchise positions go
Posted on 4/22/09 at 8:12 pm to DBG
quote:
franchise position?
really?
Yes.
If you don't see it you need to lurn2futbal.
Posted on 4/22/09 at 8:13 pm to DBG
quote:
but i'd rank it last behind QB, LT, and maybe CB as far as franchise positions go
Page 1 of 14
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News