- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ive seen this twice since the preseason polls came out
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:38 pm to MusicMaster
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:38 pm to MusicMaster
Are you saying Tennessee this year?
This post was edited on 8/17/13 at 2:39 pm
0
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:38 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
What the frick
OK. But the grind of the SEC week after week takes a toll on teams not as deep and talented. Agree?
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:39 pm to MusicMaster
Depends on your schedule.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:40 pm to MusicMaster
You can say that about any other conference. No shite that bad teams in the bottom half will get wore down by teams in the upper half that are better than them
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:40 pm to milestoothtiger
Stanford would beat LSU. Finish top 3 in the SEC
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:41 pm to craigbiggio
Go look at UCLA...they are good and it is brutal.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:41 pm to MusicMaster
You lost all credibility.....Tennessee? Georgia isn't much either imo.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:43 pm to MusicMaster
So much fail in here...
So o.p. bitches about rankings, then sites lack of draft picks and talent. Since when are rankings based purely off of talent? That's about as bad as printing up t-shirts for the recruiting championships.
Stanford is a good team, and if you think LSU is head and shoulders above them just bc of who they play, then you don't watch much football.
So o.p. bitches about rankings, then sites lack of draft picks and talent. Since when are rankings based purely off of talent? That's about as bad as printing up t-shirts for the recruiting championships.
Stanford is a good team, and if you think LSU is head and shoulders above them just bc of who they play, then you don't watch much football.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:44 pm to milestoothtiger
Stanford will have one of the best O-lines in the country for the next few years at least.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:45 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
You can say that about any other conference
Not really. To be fair here, The SEC has a lot of better athletes at the top more than any other conference. Now every conference has cellar dwelers, But the SEC is still above all others. Put I this way. Oklahoma,and Texas would do decent in the SEC for a year by year standpoint. USC could as well, the same with a Stanford. Bottom line is the SEC is way better [talent wise] than any other conference.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:45 pm to milestoothtiger
quote:
sabantoothtiger
quote:
(Posted on 8/17/13 at 12:53 pm to sabantoothtiger)
quote:Makes sense to me.
yea idiot...
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:46 pm to bisonduck
Yeah but Tennessee isn't good
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:46 pm to TH03
For me to be missing the point you would have had to have made it already...you only talked about them beating the bad teams in the conference...
And the original argument was only an expression of frustration regarding the current Stanford team's position in the top 5---not what it would look like years down the road should it join the SEC--I think we can all agree this would change things.
And so as Stanford is currently made up, no way in hell do they compete consistently with the top half of the SEC...
And the original argument was only an expression of frustration regarding the current Stanford team's position in the top 5---not what it would look like years down the road should it join the SEC--I think we can all agree this would change things.
And so as Stanford is currently made up, no way in hell do they compete consistently with the top half of the SEC...
This post was edited on 8/17/13 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:51 pm to LSUintheNW
quote:
You lost all credibility.....Tennessee?
They are not as good as they were, but still an SEC team with players that would shine in the Pac -10.
quote:
Georgia isn't much either imo.
What? They almost beat a great Bama team last year in the SEC title game. UGA is gonna be real good this year. A Senior QB and a beast rb. UGA does what most SEC teams do. They reload......
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:53 pm to RogerTheShrubber
LSU is lucky to be situated in the South. If they were in Ohio or California with that head coach, you'd be fawning over Stanford's success.
As for Stanford vs. Notre Dame, they got screwjobbed just like Oklahoma and Pitt. Notre Dame was a 9 win team in a 12 win team game last season.
As for Stanford vs. Notre Dame, they got screwjobbed just like Oklahoma and Pitt. Notre Dame was a 9 win team in a 12 win team game last season.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:54 pm to milestoothtiger
quote:I also saw Clemson beat LSU sooooooo.......
You guys just dont know college football if you really think Stanford could beat LSU. Did you watch them vs Notre Dame?
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:56 pm to MontyFranklyn
I guess though we'll never know since Stanford only schedules Sacramento St. and Duke as OOC opponents...
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:56 pm to DURANTULA
quote:
they got screwjobbed just like Oklahoma
Whoa. What? Notre Dame went onto OU and beat their arse........ A 31-6 win on the road against a real good team is not luck.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 3:14 pm to MusicMaster
Oregon vs UT will be a bloodbath. I worry more about our Pac schedule save Colorado. Cal has more talent right now.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 3:14 pm to TDawg1313
Yep. They have recruited very well at OL and know how to develop them.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News