- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ive seen this twice since the preseason polls came out
Posted on 8/17/13 at 1:31 pm to Ortho Reb
Posted on 8/17/13 at 1:31 pm to Ortho Reb
quote:
Arky and Clemson games y'all definitely shite the the bed.
Arky? yes. Clemson? No. the D was terrible and LSU did not show up against Clemson. Just a feeling of not wanting to be there cause they thought they deserved a better bowl. And the guys knew they were playing in their last game as a Tiger. it was a bad night.
0
Posted on 8/17/13 at 1:37 pm to bisonduck
I love when Oregon fans can't talk shite using their own team so they have to use Bama. sounds like you guys do actually belong in the SEC
Posted on 8/17/13 at 1:41 pm to TH03
I would fricking love to face LSU this year.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 1:44 pm to bisonduck
quote:
I would fricking love to face LSU this year.
At Home I give you a chance . Anywhere else? LSU smokes Oregon.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 1:49 pm to TH03
The Notre Dame game is all anyone is talking about...Stanford lost to Washington last year as well...I guess Washington cheated in that one also?
Stanford has nowhere near the athletes to be top 5 and they should be grateful they don't play in the SEC with that roster.
Stanford has nowhere near the athletes to be top 5 and they should be grateful they don't play in the SEC with that roster.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 1:49 pm to TH03
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/17/13 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 8/17/13 at 1:53 pm to bisonduck
you Oregon fans thought you were prepared last time too. Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:02 pm to hojo
quote:
The Notre Dame game is all anyone is talking about...Stanford lost to Washington last year as well...I guess Washington cheated in that one also?
Stanford has nowhere near the athletes to be top 5 and they should be grateful they don't play in the SEC with that roster.
yea, auburn, Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri, Tennessee, and ole miss would've been real tough for Stanford
they get 4-5 SEC wins easily, which would put them in the top half of the conference. they have the type of team that could beat any SEC team on any given Saturday, especially LSU since 3 of the teams I listed above could've beaten them last year. the same LSU team that could've beaten bama.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:02 pm to TH03
rantards need to stick to the rant.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:18 pm to TH03
So...to summarize....just to be clear...Stanford is good enough to beat the bottom half of the SEC.
So are the top 2 or 3 schools in all the major conferences...doesn't make them top 5 either and doesn't
mean either they or Stanford could hang with the top half of the SEC with their current rosters.
So are the top 2 or 3 schools in all the major conferences...doesn't make them top 5 either and doesn't
mean either they or Stanford could hang with the top half of the SEC with their current rosters.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:18 pm to milestoothtiger
Sure LSU has better talent. But that doesn't always translate to Ws. Stanford plays with great fundamentals, toughness and discipline. I also think they are better coached than LSU. That's not a knock on Miles (Shaw has a good staff) but Miles' teams get sloppy with penalties.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:20 pm to hojo
quote:
Stanford is good enough to beat the bottom half of the SEC.
kinda like where LSU stands this year
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:21 pm to bayoujd
Being sloppy and undisciplined frustrates the hell out of me. I sure hope Cam changes that.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:22 pm to hojo
It's not all about "athletes". There is a little more to football than that. Stanford (especially under Harbaugh) would do just fine in the SEC. Bama and LSU would give them trouble but they most certainly could play with A&M, Florida, UGA, and South Carolina.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:26 pm to milestoothtiger
quote:This may be the worst analogy I have ever seen. No BCS title apperance means not upper echelon?
I respect Stanford but I dont beleive the belong in the upper echelon of CFB teams just yet. No BCS titles or title game appearances.
LSUintheNW, that is the most frustrating part about watching this team year in and year out.
This post was edited on 8/17/13 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:28 pm to bayoujd
Stanford had a young oline and they improved going from Nunes to Hogan. They return everyone on defense.
This post was edited on 8/17/13 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:29 pm to hojo
quote:
So...to summarize....just to be clear...Stanford is good enough to beat the bottom half of the SEC.
in a one year hypothetical, yea, but if we're hypothetically saying Stanford is now in the SEC from here on, their funding would increase, recruiting base would be bigger in the southeast, etc, they'd probably become a powerhouse like Bama with the same recruits.
you're missing the point though. the SEC isn't some powerhouse, it's just the top teams. outside of bama, I'm sure Stanford could play with/beat any of the top SEC teams.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:36 pm to TH03
quote:
SEC isn't some powerhouse
Yes it is. LSU, Bama,UGA.FLA,South Carolina, Tennessee. These are much better teams than any other conference.
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:37 pm to MusicMaster
quote:
Tennessee
What the frick?
Posted on 8/17/13 at 2:37 pm to MusicMaster
quote:
Yes it is. LSU, Bama,UGA.FLA,South Carolina, Tennessee. These are much better teams than any other conference.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News