- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
if you're building a team who do you pick at age 21. Brady or Rodgers
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:15 am
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:15 am
I'm going with brady mainly due to his longevity. They both have enough talent to win multiple super bowls with the right talent and coaching around them
This post was edited on 10/13/17 at 9:30 am
20
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:18 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
Put Brady on most other NFL teams and he would've been out of the league in 3-4 years. Put Rodgers on any NFL team and he's very likely going to get them to the playoffs.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:18 am to High C
Thats going a little far
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:19 am to High C
quote:ok buddy.
Put Brady on most other NFL teams and he would've been out of the league in 3-4 years
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:20 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
Rodgers
For those that say Brady due to the rings, are yall actually arguing that Rodgers wouldnt have had the same success in New England?
Let me present to you my data I ran
Passer rating rank
Scoring Offense rank
Time of possession rank
Now, those last 3 charts were all things the QB has control over.
Here is SCORING defensive rankings, which is half of a football game that the QB HAS ZERO CONTROL OVER. Maybe this is why Brady wins more than the other elite Qbs......... As you can see, down at the bottom, the one year Rodgers had a top 5 defense he won the Super Bowl
For those that say Brady due to the rings, are yall actually arguing that Rodgers wouldnt have had the same success in New England?
Let me present to you my data I ran
Passer rating rank
Scoring Offense rank
Time of possession rank
Now, those last 3 charts were all things the QB has control over.
Here is SCORING defensive rankings, which is half of a football game that the QB HAS ZERO CONTROL OVER. Maybe this is why Brady wins more than the other elite Qbs......... As you can see, down at the bottom, the one year Rodgers had a top 5 defense he won the Super Bowl
This post was edited on 10/13/17 at 9:24 am
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:23 am to lsupride87
I wasn't saying because of the wins, I was saying because I know for a fact now that if I draft him at 21 I'm basically getting 2 decades of good qb play 
it's a stupid hypothetical I know
it's a stupid hypothetical I knowPosted on 10/13/17 at 9:25 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:I wasnt meaning to post that for you. It is for the rings people that are coming.....
I wasn't saying because of the wins, I was saying because I know for a fact now that if I draft him at 21 I'm basically getting 2 decades of good qb play
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:25 am to mmonro3
quote:
Thats going a little far
I don't think that it is. After all, it's just my OPINION.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:28 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:So we get to know what we know now?
Spin-off thread: if you're building a team who do you pick at age 21. Brady or Rodgers
Rodgers, easy. Rodgers over any player in the history of the NFL at 21 if I get to know ahead of time their production/efficiency.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:29 am to High C
quote:
Put Brady on most other NFL teams and he would've been out of the league in 3-4 years
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:31 am to High C
Opinions can be wrong.
Example:
Your opinion on Tom Brady is wrong.
Example:
Your opinion on Tom Brady is wrong.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:33 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
Brees
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:35 am to hg
quote:You're wong, but it just feels so right to say!!!
Brees
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:36 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
Rodgers because of his ability to escape and create plays. Brady would struggle much more than Rodgers if stuck behind a shitty line.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:37 am to Ross
quote:
Opinions can be wrong. Example: Your opinion on Tom Brady is wrong.
Speaking in absolutes on something completely hypothetical? You're wrong.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:39 am to shel311
Nah fam
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:47 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
Will Rodgers have sitting behind Favre for a few years in this scenario? Because no doubt that has helped him greatly.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:49 am to zzgobucky
quote:Why is that "no doubt"
Because no doubt that has helped him greatly.
There's no reason to think he wouldn't be just as good today if he started a couple of seasons sooner.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:52 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
At 21, anyone with logic and intelligence picks A-Rod the dude was a first round draft pick for a reason and one could make a very strong argument he should’ve been the no. 1 overall over Alex Smith. Dude was a baller at Cal submitting crazy good numbers and had all the tangibles/intangibles then, Brady lacked the tangibles hence why he was drafted 6th round. Finished product over speculated upside analysis.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 9:53 am to High C
quote:
I don't think that it is. After all, it's just my OPINION.
It's my OPINION that your OPINION is shite and would get you laughed at by anybody with any football knowledge what so ever.
Brady did have a fantastic defense when he first started, but people who would have burned out in the first 4 years don't have top 10 QB seasons at age 36 plus.
Page 1 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News