Started By
Message
locked post

Does anyone actually think the Angels are back

Posted on 5/23/13 at 5:08 pm
Posted by Reginald C Perrin
702
Member since May 2013
175 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 5:08 pm
The ESPN/MLB Network talking point today seems to be that the Angels are back because they have won 4 straight and they think they will be able to make a run to win the division.

I disagree here... this is not the 2005 Astros that started 15-30 and made the World Series. That Astros team had pitching which the Angels do not have. And the Angels do not have anyone in the farm system they could deal at the deadline should they for some reason decide to be buyers at the deadline.

To get to 94 wins(which won the division last year) they need to play .650 ball the rest of the way... not happening with that staff
Posted by Ysebaert
Member since Oct 2011
1527 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 5:39 pm to
No. They at least need to be above .500 by the break for me believe they have a chance. Winning 4 games in a row is nice but they have to keep it going.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71957 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 5:41 pm to
So you're saying they need some steroids huh?
Posted by motorbreath
New Orleans Saints fan
Member since Jun 2004
6381 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 5:53 pm to
I don't care as long as Hamilton gets going. My fantasy team needs home runs.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 6:00 pm to
They have a chance but they really need Hamilton and Pujols to get hot and stay hot for a while. Trout can get on base all he wants but somebody has to drive runners in.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278151 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 6:09 pm to
It's a weak division with Oakland, Seattle and Houston. There's a chance
Posted by Bluegrass_Cat
GVL, SC
Member since Aug 2012
1634 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

It's a weak division with Oakland, Seattle and Houston. There's a chance



Weak? I feel like if Seattle can maintain at record of 10 games of under .500 or closer, and if Oakland, Texas, and LAA are all battling for the top spot then the AL West is a hell of a division honestly.
Posted by Ysebaert
Member since Oct 2011
1527 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 10:34 pm to
Bumped for 5 in a row.
Posted by Ysebaert
Member since Oct 2011
1527 posts
Posted on 5/23/13 at 10:35 pm to
Bumped for 5 in a row.
Posted by LSUzealot
Napoleon and Magazine
Member since Sep 2003
57656 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 6:27 am to
They're only 10 games out of first.

Weren't the cardinals 9 games out of first on August 1 and won the WS?

Tons of baseball left the season isn't barely 1/4 of the way complete.
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 8:27 am to
quote:

They're only 10 games out of first


If the team at the top of their division didn't look as good as the Ranger's do, they would have reason for optimism. As it stands, they would need the Rangers to go through an extended drought to have a chance.

Consider this, the Rangers have not lost a single away series this year and have not lost more than two games in a row yet. This is with two rookie starters in the rotation.
Posted by DEANintheYAY
LEFT COAST
Member since Jan 2008
31975 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 10:21 am to
Your last point is why they could have issues. Also we know that they have some injury prone players, Cruz for example.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Consider this, the Rangers have not lost a single away series this year and have not lost more than two games in a row yet. This is with two rookie starters in the rotation.
All reasons to believe that they will not be able to keep that up for an entire season. If the Angels stay healthy and get some better production from their starters, they will close the gap by then end of the summer to make the division competitive.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71957 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 10:29 am to
They have 13 games left vs TEX too
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Your last point is why they could have issues.


Right, but the Rangers will be getting their regular starters back in the next month.

quote:

Also we know that they have some injury prone players, Cruz for example.


True, but compare him to the Angels current right fielder in this regard and its a wash.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Weak?
Probably the weakest in baseball.
Posted by 9Fiddy
19th Hole
Member since Jan 2007
64022 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:10 am to
quote:

All reasons to believe that they will not be able to keep that up for an entire season.

You are aware those rookie starters are not permenantly in the rotation, right?
Posted by GeauxAggie972
Poterbin Residence
Member since Aug 2009
29428 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:17 am to
quote:

All reasons to believe that they will not be able to keep that up for an entire season


Pitchers currently on the DL:

Ogando - Only 15-day
Perez - Makes his debut against Arizona
Colby Lewis - Should be back in the next two weeks
Soria - Should be back after the all-star break
Feliz - Same as Soria

That dominant bullpen that the Rangers currently have could get quite nasty when Soria and Feliz return
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:19 am to
quote:

All reasons to believe that they will not be able to keep that up for an entire season. If the Angels stay healthy and get some better production from their starters, they will close the gap by then end of the summer to make the division competitive.

the rangers pitching staff is the equivalent of chewing gum and bailing wire right now and they have the best record in the AL - but yeah no reason to think the Angels wont come over take them
Posted by 9Fiddy
19th Hole
Member since Jan 2007
64022 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:23 am to
Right now, the Rangers are on pace for 103 wins. Factoring in slumps, which we all know will happen, and other injuries, I think 90 wins would be the low end of what they will end up with.

That means to get to 91 wins, the Halos have to be 71-44 (.617) at a minimum from now, until the end of the year. That is not factoring in if Oakland gets hot and puts up 90+ wins too.

It's doable, but I'd put the odds at 20:1 right now.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram