Started By
Message

Do people actually believe OKC has a better supporting cast than last year?

Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:16 pm
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
10441 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:16 pm
Minus Durant, of course?

I am listening to Houston sports radio and they are debating with a caller on Westbrook vs Harden for MVP, and the caller states that Westbrook has a crap team, while Harden has significantly better talent around him.

The hosts go on a diatribe about how the OKC Thunder are on pace to get 46+ wins which is only 9 less than last year with Durant and that this means clearly their role players are better than last year.

I nearly spit up my drink seeing as they decided to forget that Ibaka existed on that team the last years, but apparently he doesn't count as a big time player.

It is hilarious to hear Houstonites try and say anything to prop up Harden.
This post was edited on 3/27/17 at 1:17 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110626 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

I am listening to Houston sports radio and they are debating with a caller on Westbrook vs Harden for MVP, and the caller states that Westbrook has a crap team, while Harden has significantly better talent around him.

I think the real difference is the way each coach/team is using their available pieces. That and the remarkable health HOU has had, i think they've had the most or 2nd most(somewhere around there) least missed games.

quote:

I nearly spit up my drink seeing as they decided to forget that Ibaka existed on that team the last years, but apparently he doesn't count as a big time player
What are the big changes, no Ibaka, add Oladipo. What else? If that is the main ones, I'd say there hasn't been much change.
Posted by StlPoke
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2017
1191 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:30 pm to
Waiters
Ibaka
Foye
Augustin
Payne(he was injured most of this season before the trade)
Mohammed
Morrow (rarely played this season before trade)

-------

Oladipo
Grant
Sabonis
Abrines
Christon

Kanter, Adams, Singler, Roberson, Collison were on both

They traded experience for youth and athleticism.

The additions of Gibson and McDermott put this year's roster over last year's minus Durant.

Ibaka was a shell of himself. They absolutely fleeced Orlando in that trade.
This post was edited on 3/27/17 at 1:38 pm
Posted by LittleRockHog501
Member since Nov 2011
2480 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:30 pm to
They lost Durant and swapped Ibaka for Vic. The cast around Russ was about the same for most of the year up until the trade that upgraded them on paper some. That doesn't mean they are world beater role players either though. Just not trash like some say
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:37 pm to
OKC is about where they were supposed to be preseason. Mid 40s in wins is where vegas had them.

CC on the other hands is gonna finish 15 games up on the preseason vegas over under total.

Westbrooks teammates are being crapped on in order to make his MVP case. And I feel terrible for them.

Kanter oladipo Adams. Were all ranked higher on the Preseason player ranker than any CC player besides harden. And now it's 'harden has all the talent harden has too much talent' when preseason not too many were saying HOU would be better than OKC.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
10441 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

I think the real difference is the way each coach/team is using their available pieces. That and the remarkable health HOU has had, i think they've had the most or 2nd most(somewhere around there) least missed games.


Houston has gotten lucky on two key signings with getting a healthy Eric Gordon and Ryan Anderson. That is a huge difference.

quote:

What are the big changes, no Ibaka, add Oladipo. What else? If that is the main ones, I'd say there hasn't been much change.


Minus Durant being the largest effect, losing
Ibaka for a middle of the road shooting guard is a net loss for them. Ibaka was by far a bigger impact player than Olidap is and was more key to their success by far.

So lose two of your best three players, replace them with a mediocre player, and somehow its a better returning cast according to the idiots.

They will say anything to prop up Harden and try and justify him being better when he's not.

Furthermore, they are still whining about the 2015 MVP race as if he was shafted royally by Curry getting it.

Curry: 23.8 pts, 4.3 rebounds, 7.7 assists, 2 steals, 3.1 turnovers, in 32.7 minutes per game
* Set NBA 3 pointers record

Harden: 27.4 pts, 5.7 rebounds, 7 assists, 1.9 steals, 4 turnovers in 38.2 minutes per game
* Harder sets free throw attempts records


3 Things:

The fact is that Golden State was by far the best team in the regular season (not top 3-4), which makes a huge difference.

If Curry plays the Minutes Harden does (assuming he maintains his averages), he is better in every category, thus Harden shouldn't get the award because he got more time to log stats.

Setting a free throws taken record because you try to initiate contact every play to draw a foul is not as impressive in any way shape or form as setting an all-time 3 pointers made in a season record.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
10441 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

OKC is about where they were supposed to be preseason. Mid 40s in wins is where vegas had them.


This happens when a player like Russ is known to give 110% all game on both sides of the ball unlike Harden.

quote:


CC on the other hands is gonna finish 15 games up on the preseason vegas over under total.


Helps when you are one of the healthiest teams in the league and your two key acquisitions on the season are playing more games than they have in the past few years. Gordon and Anderson weren't coming cheap because of lack of skills, their health was the concern.

So you want to tell me Harden deserves it because of luck?
Posted by reo45
Member since Nov 2015
6362 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Kanter oladipo Adams. Were all ranked higher on the Preseason player ranker than any CC player besides harden. And now it's 'harden has all the talent harden has too much talent' when preseason not too many were saying HOU would be better than OKC.



My deal with OKC is the lack of progression with Adams and his offense. With Kanter it is his inability to play better defense. Oladipo is and has played as well as you are going to get out of another score first guard like Westbrook but is nothing of the all-around player Ariza is.

Harden will be the MVP and if he doesn't you can poo-poo the award as worthless. It really already is when you consider LeBron before this season was the MVP for YEARS and won few too many. Also, Shaq winning only 1 MVP is a joke too.

Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83395 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

And I feel terrible for them.
frick outta here
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:57 pm to
Luck? No harden deserves it because he's having arguably the best offensive season in the history of the league.
Posted by Woopigsooie20
Me Scusi
Member since Mar 2010
57350 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Kanter oladipo Adams


2 of the 3 has missed significant time.

quote:

Westbrooks teammates are being crapped on in order to make his MVP case. And I feel terrible for them. 


Oh shut the frick up
Posted by Woopigsooie20
Me Scusi
Member since Mar 2010
57350 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

No harden deserves it because he's having arguably the best offensive season in the history of the league.


Not even the best this year
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:08 pm to
damn strong argument

j/s


Russ' efficiency is doing his squad NO favours.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82010 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:13 pm to
Harden doesn't necessarily have a better cast around him, but the pieces fit much better than the thunder's. Props to D'antoni.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

Geauxgurt


What a terrible post.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83395 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:20 pm to
Exactly. Harden is great. And having one seriously great season. But all this shite about Vegas had em here and that team there is rediculous.

Harden could have this exact season with a shite/broken team and they wouldn't be half as successful. Harden is amazing, but the winning is largely due to the Rockets having damn near perfect pieces for the system that they run.

Give the MVP to Harden. He deserves it. But the situation he's in is ideal. It doesn't matter where ESPN ranked anybody.

ETA: ridiculous
This post was edited on 3/27/17 at 7:33 pm
Posted by StlPoke
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2017
1191 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

Minus Durant being the largest effect, losing Ibaka for a middle of the road shooting guard is a net loss for them. Ibaka was by far a bigger impact player than Olidap is and was more key to their success by far.


They got Oladipo, Sabonis, and Illyasova for Ibaka. They flipped Illyasova for Jerami Grant.

That was a brilliant trade.

Ibaka had turned into an overpaid stretch 4. His tremendous help defense had been offset by teams using other stretch 4's to force him to guard the perimeter, and he doesn't have quick enough feet to stay in front of athletic 4s.

They were never going to re-sign him, because he simply isn't worth the money long term. Orlando figured that out pretty quickly and shipped him out to try to salvage something
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110626 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

Harden doesn't necessarily have a better cast around him, but the pieces fit much better than the thunder's. Props to D'antoni.

Bingo, I mentioned that earlier. That's 100% it.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110626 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

Exactly. Harden is great. And having one seriously great season. But all this shite about Vegas had em here and that team there is rediculous.

IT doesn't make sense. I've said it for years fwiw, not just because it's HOU.

So the predictions were wrong and HOU won more than we thought. Ok, and what? That just means we were wrong, and they're better than they thought we are. There's nothing else to extrapolate from that, that's it, we were just wrong.

Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27304 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:42 pm to
The point is that nobody thought much of their individual players before the season started. Nobody was talking about their roster being talented.

People were picking them to finish 8th or even miss the playoffs based on their individual players. Nobody thought much of Anderson and Gordon.

Now that the team is playing so well all of a sudden Houston is "stacked" and their roster is so talented. Nobody thought their players were that good before the season started. Now all of a sudden their roster is stacked.

It's a load of crap. Just because they are winning and are a really good team, the roster didn't change except for the Lou Williams trade.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram