Started By
Message

Bagwell vs Thomas

Posted on 1/8/14 at 1:30 pm
Posted by Smokedawg
Finding Lennay Kekua
Member since Dec 2008
5401 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 1:30 pm
Jeff Bagwell stats. 15 years

.297 Avg
.408 OBP
.540 SLG
.948 OPS
2,314 hits
449 home runs
1,529 RBI's
1,517 Runs
202 steals
1401 walks
.993 Fld%

4× All-Star
1994 Gold Glove Winner
3× Silver Slugger Award winner
1994 NL MVP
1991 NL Rookie of the Year


Frank Thomas stats. 19 years

.301 AVG
.419 OBP
.555 SLG
.974 OPS
2,468 hits
521 home runs
1,704 RBI's
1,494 runs
32 steals
1667 walks
.991 Fld%

5× All-Star
4× Silver Slugger Award winner
2× AL MVP )
1997 AL batting title
2000 AL Comeback Player of the Year
1995 Home Run Derby champion






Cleary they both have Hall of Fame careers, but how does Frank get in on his first try, but Bagwell doesn't on his fourth. Why is Bags accused of PED and Frank isn't?

Posted by beaver
The 755 Club
Member since Sep 2009
46861 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Why is Bags accused of PED and Frank isn't?


not sure if serious
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 1:33 pm to
Frank was always a big dude.

Bags bulked up a lot in his early years
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46173 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 1:34 pm to
Well Frank has better numbers in almost every category
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
40907 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 1:38 pm to
my only question is how in the frick did Frank manage to get 32 steals?
Posted by Smokedawg
Finding Lennay Kekua
Member since Dec 2008
5401 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 1:39 pm to
Well frank played 19 years, and the last 4 he was a DH

Bagwell played 15 and the last season he only play in 24 games.
Posted by ehole
in a house
Member since Nov 2010
3373 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 3:06 pm to
just accept it bags isn't making it in this way... my guy is on year 5 no go. if McGriff only had 8 more hr to hit the 500 mark it'd be automatic. oh well, f baseball
Posted by Silky Johnston
DFW
Member since May 2013
998 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Well Frank has better numbers in almost every category

162 game averages:

Frank Thomas
R - 104
HR - 36
RBI - 119
SB - 2
BB - 116

Bagwell
R - 114
HR - 34
RBI - 115
SB - 15
BB - 106

Pretty damn comparable with Bags holding a significant advantage in steals (if you're into that sort of thing). Not to mention Bagwell played 81 games a season in the Astrodome for the better part of his career.
Posted by B1rdman15
The Office
Member since Feb 2010
5143 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 3:11 pm to
It's a bummer that Bags isn't in. That 1994 season was, until Cabrera's recently, one of the most impressive seasons I've seen.
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11121 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 3:15 pm to
This is why the Hall of fame gets more watered down every year. People want to compare stats of a non-HOFer to a low end HOFer and rationalize getting more borderline guys in.

The old saying is true. If you have to ask if a guy belongs in the Hall of Fame, he doesnt. Can't anybody just be a very good player without everyone wanting him to be a Hall of famer?
This post was edited on 1/8/14 at 3:18 pm
Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6069 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 3:19 pm to
And, they were born on the exact same day!

Thomas was better, though.
Posted by CunningLinguist
Dallas, TX
Member since Mar 2006
18755 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 3:20 pm to
Those late 90s/ early 2000 Astros teams were a phrarmacuy clinic for steroids. Not saying Bagwell was a juicer but he is tainted by association
This post was edited on 1/8/14 at 3:21 pm
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
76624 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Not to mention Bagwell played 81 games a season in the Astrodome for the better part of his career.


Ding ding ding. Bagwell has better ballpark adjusted numbers.
Posted by LSUnowhas2
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
21981 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 3:22 pm to
Because Bagwell went from looking like this:



to looking like this:



guy probably put on 30 to 40 lbs of muscle in a relatively short period of time.
Posted by Silky Johnston
DFW
Member since May 2013
998 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 3:44 pm to
I loved Bagwell growing up and I'll even admit that the likelihood of him doing steroids is pretty high, but that specific picture comparison is far from compelling evidence. Houston didn't go to the red logos until 2000. 1991 vs. 2000 is 10 years. A lot can change in 10 years. Not a good comparison.

Hell I accidentally gained 50 pounds in the last 10 years.
This post was edited on 1/8/14 at 3:46 pm
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

that specific picture comparison is far from compelling evidence.

He's not that much different.

I mean,

His 95 Topps card


Its not exactly this:
Posted by The White Lobster
Member since Jul 2009
16764 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 4:14 pm to
The percentage of players in the hall of fame is decreasing every year
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
202510 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

1995 Home Run Derby champion



Like THIS matters...........


BTW Thomas all the way.......
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
31888 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 5:46 pm to
Frank Thomas and Bagwell have comparable numbers. Thomas got in because he is one of a handful of guys, alongside Maddux, Glavine, Larkin, Griffey Jr., and maybe Biggio who are considered clean by the vast majority of the baseball writers.

Schilling and Raines are also considered clean but didn't get in (I'm basically counting Biggio in, as he is a lock for next year), but the reason why the vast majority of 90s players aren't getting in is simply because of PED association.
Posted by 1ranter1
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
10387 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 5:51 pm to
Milestones. Thomas got to 500 HRs and Bagwell didn't.

But Astro fans shouldn't be upset about players getting in because of milestones, it will be the only reason Biggio gets in.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram