- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
AP to meet with Saints
Posted on 4/7/17 at 6:01 am
Posted on 4/7/17 at 6:01 am
LINK
They no longer have Hightower and after last season it appears Payton has no problem using 2 RBs.
I'm still waiting for him to get smart, lower his ask and sign with my Packers though! The saga continues.
They no longer have Hightower and after last season it appears Payton has no problem using 2 RBs.
I'm still waiting for him to get smart, lower his ask and sign with my Packers though! The saga continues.
3
Posted on 4/7/17 at 6:03 am to dualed
quote:
after last season it appears Payton has no problem using 2 RBs.
We've been doing it since the payton Era started
Posted on 4/7/17 at 6:06 am to CajunsTigersSaints
Idk, last season seemed like more of a bigger mix than usual. Perhaps it was because I owned Ingram in fantasy so I just noticed it more, idk.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 6:18 am to dualed
Ingram, Peterson, Kuhn pain train
Posted on 4/7/17 at 6:53 am to dualed
That's what they need a RB. No d line linebacker TE. Wow
Posted on 4/7/17 at 7:27 am to Hamma1122
quote:
That's what they need a RB. No d line linebacker TE. Wow
They actually do need a rb
And if they sign one they can still sign other guys
Idiot
Posted on 4/7/17 at 9:42 am to Hamma1122
quote:
That's what they need a RB. No d line linebacker TE. Wow
there's this thing in a couple of weeks known as the NFL draft, ever heard of it?
Posted on 4/7/17 at 9:43 am to Hamma1122
A team with certain position needs can't meet with players of other positions?
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 9:44 am
Posted on 4/7/17 at 9:44 am to Hamma1122
quote:
No d line linebacker TE. Wow
We've signed a DE, resigned Fairley, and signed 2 linebackers.
We don't need to spend any money on a TE, we have 3.
And we traded Cooks for the #32 pick to help address defense. We need to add a pass rusher in the draft, and we're set on the line.
what defensive lineman or linebacker should we sign? what TE?
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 9:45 am
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:32 am to Hamma1122
quote:no commas? Wow.
No d line linebacker TE. Wow
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:34 am to Hamma1122
quote:
That's what they need a RB. No d line linebacker TE. Wow
RB is one of the top 3 or so needs on the team. They have literally no one behind Ingram. Will probably pick one in the first 3 rounds if they don't sign Peterson. Still might even if they do.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:37 am to Fun Bunch
Yep, I'd put our biggest needs after who we've signed as:
1) pass rusher
2) #1 corner
3) running back
We could use an upgrade at MLB, but we have also already upgraded and added depth
1) pass rusher
2) #1 corner
3) running back
We could use an upgrade at MLB, but we have also already upgraded and added depth
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:39 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
We could use an upgrade at MLB
They signed one guy that will play MLB for 5 million dollars a year, and signed another one that has primarily played MLB behind him.
They already upgraded MLB. Now, if you want to talk WILL, that's another story.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:46 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
They already upgraded MLB
Hence the second part of that sentence:
quote:
We could use an upgrade at MLB, but we have also already upgraded and added depth
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:48 am to TigerBait1127
Well then this
Doesn't make any sense.
quote:
We could use an upgrade at MLB
Doesn't make any sense.
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:52 am to Fun Bunch
Sure it does, and it is also why I didn't put it as one of our biggest needs.
Is he an improvement over what we already had and does he allow Robertson to play outside?
Yes, therefore he is an upgrade
Is he going to be one of the better linebackers in the NFL?
No.
Could there be a prospect that could be a great MLB?
Yes
And we don't even know if Teo will make the roster coming off his injury and poor play. I like the move because there is little risk.
Is he an improvement over what we already had and does he allow Robertson to play outside?
Yes, therefore he is an upgrade
Is he going to be one of the better linebackers in the NFL?
No.
Could there be a prospect that could be a great MLB?
Yes
And we don't even know if Teo will make the roster coming off his injury and poor play. I like the move because there is little risk.
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 10:53 am
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News