Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

1947 MLB American League MVP

Posted on 7/17/10 at 9:57 pm
Posted by Drexel
Orlando
Member since Oct 2008
192 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 9:57 pm
Any explanation for this? How did Ted Williams lose the AL MVP to Joe Dimaggio in 1947?

Joe DiMaggio NYY Games-141 AB-534 Runs-97 Hits-168 HRs-20 RBIs-97 SB-3 BB-64 BA.-315 . OBP-.391 SLG-.522 OPS-.913

Ted Williams BOS Games-156 AB-528 Runs-125 Hits-181 HRs-32 RBIs-114 SB-0 BB-162 BA-.343 OBP-.499 SLG-.634 OPS-1.133
This post was edited on 7/17/10 at 9:58 pm
Posted by Chatagnier
Member since Sep 2008
6851 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 9:59 pm to
Media always have loved the Yankees
Posted by The Easter Bunny
Minnesota
Member since Jan 2005
45566 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 10:01 pm to
The Yankees did win the WS that year
Posted by LJB
Member since Mar 2009
871 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 10:06 pm to
Wow. Check the stolen bases stat???

I guess the world series is the key. What was bostons record that year?
Posted by 1ranter1
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
10393 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

Any explanation for this? How did Ted Williams lose the AL MVP to Joe Dimaggio in 1947?


Yankees 97-57
Red Sox 83-71

Same reason Lou Boudreau won it in 1948 even though Dimaggio's stats were better
Posted by Drexel
Orlando
Member since Oct 2008
192 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

Yankees 97-57
Red Sox 83-71

I would understand if the Sox had been last in their division, but they were second to the Yankees, and the stats were so in Williams' favor. That can't make up for the numbers Williams put up. Look at the 1941 MVP voting. Williams hit .406 and led the league in Hrs. I highly doubt that would happen today. I guess that's what i'm saying.

LINK
Posted by Drexel
Orlando
Member since Oct 2008
192 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 10:22 pm to
Boudreau had more runs, hits, and a better batting avg. than DiMaggio in 34 less at bats. There was at least an argument there. In 1947, Williams beat DiMaggio in every single category, save stolen bases. The logic doesn't go that far...
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33919 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 10:29 pm to
There are a couple things to keep in mind.

#1- Dimaggio played a more premium, important position and was out of the world good defensively in that position (Think Andruw Jones in his prime good).
#2- There isn't a superstar that played in tougher hitting conditions in his home ballpark that Joe Dimaggio. Left-center field in Yankee Stadium was called Death Valley for a reason. It was well over 450 feet. If Dimaggio had played in another ballpark, he would have easily hit over 500 HRs for his career. Also, the hitting background was brutal especially during the daytime. A lot of stadiums such as Fenway Park had a black tarp cover the center field seats which allowed hitters to pick up the ball from the pitcher better. Yankee Stadium did the exact opposite. They put seats up there in the CF bleachers which were usually filled with fans wearing white. Hitters complained so much about how difficult it was to pick up the ball in the white background that they eventually put a black tarp up to allow hitters to see the ball better. Dimaggio's numbers would have been way better than they were if he played his home games in any other stadium.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141632 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

Media always have loved the Yankees



And the reporters hated Williams

I believe one Boston writer, "Colonel" Dugan, left Williams off his ballot completely
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141632 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

Look at the 1941 MVP voting. Williams hit .406 and led the league in Hrs


Williams himself publicly stated he would have voted for DiMaggio as MVP in 1941
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 10:51 pm to
ESPN... oh, wait...
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 10:54 pm to
That's because Ted was a surly a-hole to him. OK, not just to him, but you get my point.
Posted by Drexel
Orlando
Member since Oct 2008
192 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 11:15 pm to
Thanks. I've been turning this over in my head for the past few years, and you're the first to give a solid explanation. I still believe that at that time, knocking in runs and hitting for average were a high commodity, and noone provided that better than ted. No matter how many Hrs DiMaggio hit, he still didn't record as many RBIs, and had the ball park been that much of a disadvantage, men would have been on base when DiMaggio was up. That said, the Yankees won the pennant. I just don't think the same result would happen today. Great reasoning though, it's hard to argue with
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278157 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

Bench McElroy



didnt know you were so old. good info
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33919 posts
Posted on 7/17/10 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

didnt know you were so old. good info


I'm not that old but I do read up a lot about sports. There's a lot of information out there, man.
This post was edited on 7/17/10 at 11:49 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram