Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Whole Life Insurance as a means to shelter "safe money"

Posted on 1/12/15 at 10:36 am
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
102970 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 10:36 am
thinking about the possibility of Whole life (small amount) policy, not for the death benefit but for a means to protect and grow some retirement assets. "safely".

the pros for me would be the tax benefit, the protection from exposure to the market and safe growth—5-6%. Also, it has an element of liquidity.

I have always been against this type of policy but I'm considering it as a "safe bucket" within the portfolio for retirement (also have 401ks, managed investment accounts…)

Thoughts?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89476 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 10:41 am to
quote:

not for the death benefit but for a means to protect and grow some retirement assets. "safely".


I don't see how it is much of a growth vehicle - at all.

Most people get sold these policies in middle age - they are probably a better value for young purchasers - who really can't afford enough to make this a viable investment vehicle - while I'm certain that tax experts and financial managers may disagree with me (and I'm all ears, by the way) - unless you actually die holding the policy, virtually any combination of term life insurance and a variety of mutual funds (perhaps heavier in bonds, etc.) are going to provide a better ROI over any period of time.

Just my 2 cents and probably not worth that.
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
102970 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 10:50 am to
Thanks. I"m not a financial planning expert at all and I appreciate the different opinions. the rationale for me (not 100% sold yet) would be this would be a portion of the overall retirement plan with the 401ks and managed accounts more on the growth/aggressive side and also containing more of the eggs from my basket. this option would just be a way to safely protect a portion and be able to project a safe amount to buttress the overall nut at retirement. I like that you can also take from it if you need to so its fairly liquid
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37007 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 10:57 am to
Whole life as an investment vehicle would be pretty far down the list of buckets in which I would place money. I don't believe in absolutes so I would never say "don't ever do it" but certainly you would have to look at the overall picture of your finances.

The best piece of advice, though, it to take a good, hard look at the projections. Some agents/companies like to run an illustration with a pretty aggressive rate. That's not guaranteed. There is a guaranteed rate, which is often much lower and usually not much better than inflation. Plus, you have the fees.

Remember - with whole life insurance - you are buying two things - cash value growth and insurance protection. It's going to be more expensive than buying only one of those things.

In any event... if you are serious... I'd look at Northwestern Mutual, Mass Mutual and New York Life. And that's about it.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89476 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 11:05 am to
quote:

I don't believe in absolutes so I would never say "don't ever do it"


And I'll echo this - I'm not saying whole/permanent life is "never" appropriate for a portfolio, but it is not a true investment vehicle - it is a hybrid and it's performance MUST be compared on a CBA for the separate products (i.e. term or even group life - if eligible) it combines. There is little question that it is a poor vehicle for growth and probably only marginally better as an asset protection measure. It may make sense if you also need the additional death protection, but, again, I think that it is a better value for ayounger individual (getting that permanent premium at a much lower level and having a longer exposure period).

One size does not fit all - the more risk averse an individual is, the more likely he or she chooses this vehicle, IMHO.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 11:42 am to
quote:

I like that you can also take from it if you need to so its fairly liquid


Be careful in the area of liquidity if you may have a need to access your money in the early years of a whole life policy. If you look at the historical year by year returns for the major carrier's whole life policies most show a negative rate for the first 5 to 10 years,the 5% return used in illustrations is usually a 20 year average.
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
102970 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 12:01 pm to
Thanks I appreciate the input guys. someone said it earlier…I would think of it as an asset protection vehicle, but I'm not 100% yet.
Posted by Douboy
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2007
4332 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 2:33 pm to
I use whole life for this and other reasons. It is a hedge on the money I have in the market. I have 3 whole life polices. I pay yearly premiums and paid up additions on 2 of them and the 3rd I was able to buy paying the premium in full up front (it is structured differently).

This isn't popular among most people you talk to because most simply can't afford to do it. Not trying to be a dick, it is true. If you have the money to consider it, that is awesome.

I won't know if my strategy will pay off until decades from now (unless I die early and my wife/kids get paid), so I can't really say much more other than that. I may be the dumb arse for doing this, but it seems like a good plan to me, especially in this crazy market environment.

For what it's worth, I also do the normal stuff (index funds, IRA's, yada yada).

FYI, the company I use is Guardian.

Posted by TigerAlum1982
Member since Sep 2011
1437 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 3:57 pm to
I really don't know much at all about life insurance, but I bought a whole life policy from Northwestern Mutual to help out a friend who had just started working for them. I was about 28 and am now 60. It had a $20,000 death benefit, with dividends reinvested each year to buy up additional insurance. it costs me $18/mo. I just got my statement in the mail today. The death benefit is $37,722 and cash value is $19,353. I always kept it up because I though $18 was not very much. Glad I did.
Posted by ItzMe1972
Member since Dec 2013
9773 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:18 pm to
The death benefit is $37,722 and cash value is $19,353. I always kept it up because I though $18 was not very much. Glad I did.

-------

My financial calculator says your average annual rate of return over this period is 5.64%.

But keep in mind that if the death benefit is paid out, the cash value is not paid. So, please do not add those two numbers together.

Many policy holders think they get the death benefit PLUS the cash value which they do not (insurance company keeps it!).

Many are misled/mistaken.
Posted by Rhino5
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2014
28897 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:25 pm to
Use a traditional IRA as a safety vehicle. Tax deductible all the way up until April 15 of the tax year.
Posted by Ole War Skule
North Shore
Member since Sep 2003
3409 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 9:37 pm to
the vast majority if whole life plans are a scam and terribly inappropriate for just about everyone. Do some research.
Posted by nelatf
NELA
Member since Jan 2011
2296 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 10:54 pm to
I bought one in my mid 20s - it has worked out nicely for me.

Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12420 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 11:18 pm to
quote:


thinking about the possibility of Whole life (small amount) policy, not for the death benefit


My take away from whole life is that if you are not in it for the death benefit, then invest in something else.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram