Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Roth IRA vs. 457 Plan (LA State Employee)

Posted on 1/1/13 at 10:39 pm
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
13847 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 10:39 pm
I'm a Louisiana state employee. Currently I'm contributing around $3k per year to the LA Public Employees Deferred Compensation Plan in addition to my mandatory LASERS contributions. I was hoping the board could give me some advice on this plan compared to a Roth IRA. I've done some research and both plans obviously have their benefits, but I'm not going to pretend to know which plan would be better for me and why.

I'm 25, have been working for 18 months, and am just trying to build a nest egg. I have no debt and don't plan on accessing this money until retirement age unless I absolutely need it. Also, I do not know that I will remain a state employee for the duration of my professional career.

My Questions. As I begin to increase my contributions, should I open up a Roth IRA or continue to just put in to the 457 plan? Should I just drop the 457 plan and contribute to a Roth until I'm maxing it out? Any advice is appreciated.
Posted by ATL TGR
Houston
Member since Apr 2008
2878 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:02 am to
quote:

should I open up a Roth IRA


Yes. $450/month for the rest of your working life and you should be good to go @ retirement

quote:

Should I just drop the 457 plan


Nope. Contribute to both. No reason not to plan for your future
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 2:06 am to
quote:

Nope. Contribute to both. No reason not to plan for your future


If you can afford to put money in both why not? Short term sacrifice for long term happiness.

My dad isnear retirement who is a top 1-2% income earner is having problems because he started saving late then had problems with how he has saved. Said that his biggest mistake was not saving early when he could have
Posted by sstig
Houston
Member since Oct 2003
2766 posts
Posted on 1/2/13 at 4:01 pm to
If you only save $450/mo and get a 5% return, in 35 years you will have a little over $500K. Sounds like a lot but it is not. Do both!!!
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
13847 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

Nope. Contribute to both. No reason not to plan for your future

Which one first? Is there a consensus on which is better?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram