Gold is a stagnant investment | TigerDroppings.com
Posted by
Message
smilodonfatalis
Georgia Fan
Georgia 36,000 BP
Member since Sep 2012
375 posts

Gold is a stagnant investment

Read this in a business column this morning.

In 1981 gold was $613 an oz. Adjusted for inflation that would be worth $1727 today.

The current price of gold is ~$1552 an oz. So if you bought gold in 1981 it would be worth much less today.

Plus it pays no dividends. A gold buyer in 1981 would be a double loser.




Doc Fenton
LSU Fan
Member since Feb 2007
51087 posts

Bestbank Tiger
Tulane Fan
Landmass
Member since Jan 2005
22508 posts
Online

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
In other words, gold doesn't go up in value. It just goes up in price.

Good hedge against inflation, but stocks are probably the best long term investment. If they suck over the long term, we're all screwed anyway.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
Newbomb Turk
Navy Fan
perfectanschlagen
Member since May 2008
9961 posts

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
I've got a small amount of gold -- mainly just Krugerrands I've picked up over the years. I never really thought of it as an investment per se as I never really plan to sell it. Hopefully, it will just be passed on to my heirs. To me, it's strictly a hedge in case the entire world economy goes to shite. If that happens, my small amount will skyrocket and hopefully will get me through any great world depression.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
rintintin
New Orleans Saints Fan
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
8844 posts
Online

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
I don't think most people buy gold looking to make money, as Turk said its mainly a hedge against inflation and an economic disaster.


Ace Midnight
LSU Fan
Currently asymptomatic
Member since Dec 2006
36728 posts

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
It is a hedge against inflation/deflation. It gives you a buffer. It is not strictly an "investment," but, rather a diversification "purchase" if you will.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
Teddy Ruxpin
LSU Fan
New Orleans, LA
Member since Oct 2006
21341 posts

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
quote:

and an economic disaster.


The way I see it, in such a scenario gold would be worthless to the average owner because the guy with more guns is just going to take it from you.


rintintin
New Orleans Saints Fan
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
8844 posts
Online

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
If the guy with more guns is willing to take your gold, what's keeping him from taking everything you own? If your deduction is correct then there would be no point in acquiring anything of presumed value.


Teddy Ruxpin
LSU Fan
New Orleans, LA
Member since Oct 2006
21341 posts

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
quote:

If the guy with more guns is willing to take your gold, what's keeping him from taking everything you own? If your deduction is correct then there would be no point in acquiring anything of presumed value.


What?

Let me single out the point I think you missed. People don't acquire wealth for the specific purpose of hedging against catastrophe (They acquire it for that a bit, but also for vacation, shite to buy, retirement, etc). Some gold buyers do buy for that purpose.

What I was saying was, if you are buying gold for the specific purpose as a store of wealth during a catastrophe, my opinion is that you are wasting your time because gold will probably never fulfill that purpose because I feel in such a scenario you will never peacefully be able to transact with it to acquire goods. Therefore, it is neither helping you during times absent catastrophe or during them and therefore could be seen as a waste of time and effort.

However, my assets for investment, while they can be stolen during such a catastrophe and therefore "worthless," are clearly not worthless in the absence there of.

Hence, the flaw in your argument.

Of Course, you could have the scenario where there is economic catastrophe of such proportions where gold was the only reliable asset yet civil order and peace were in abundance as well, but in my opinion that is doubtful to occur. And in my opinion, the Great Depression doesn't count as an example but I'm willing to hear the argument.
This post was edited on 4/7 at 1:45 pm


Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
5449 posts
Online

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
quote:

he way I see it, in such a scenario gold would be worthless to the average owner because the guy with more guns is just going to take it from you.



There's a pretty wide field between "economic catastrophe" and "end of civilization"


ItNeverRains
LSU Fan
Franklin, TN
Member since Oct 2007
7279 posts

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
I would be more interested to see a chart from 1913-present. I'll try to dig one up.

I also be inclined to think the average gold bug is also a gun bug.


Doc Fenton
LSU Fan
Member since Feb 2007
51087 posts

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
Most charts don't back that far, because the price of gold used to be fixed to the currency.

If you want historical market values going back to the 13rd century, you can check out measuringworth.com.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
Teddy Ruxpin
LSU Fan
New Orleans, LA
Member since Oct 2006
21341 posts

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
Sure. I mentioned the great depression. Did people who had prepared with gold lug it out and start using it? How about during previous panics? I honestly want to know because I have a hard time finding a scenario where people stop taking currency yet are peacefully transacting like normal but with gold.


Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
5449 posts
Online

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
FDR put the brakes on that when he was inaugurated by forcing a gold buy back.

That could take place in a future economic disaster, of course, but I think the general public would be a lot more resistant to such an order today.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
rintintin
New Orleans Saints Fan
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
8844 posts
Online

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
I don't think people plan on actually purchasing items with gold shillings like back in the day. I believe the thought is more geared towards the fact that gold has historically held its value globally, independent of fiat currency. If a currency collapsed locally, one could use gold as a store of value and move to a new area wherein the gold could be used to acquire the currency of the new area.

Or if a new currency needed to be put in place, again, gold could be used to store value during the transition period then to acquire said new currency.


Teddy Ruxpin
LSU Fan
New Orleans, LA
Member since Oct 2006
21341 posts

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
First scenario my opinion is that could work if your local economy isn't the USA since if the USA collapses there will not be many places to move to who are not suffering almost as badly.

The second scenario could work if you could protect your assets of course, regardless of place of residence.

Obviously its all theoretical and if you have the money and the gold insurance works then you win and I lose.
This post was edited on 4/7 at 3:17 pm


rintintin
New Orleans Saints Fan
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
8844 posts
Online

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
quote:

First scenario my opinion is that could work if your local economy isn't the USA since if the USA collapses there will not be many places to move to who are not suffering almost as badly.


Yeah that's the kicker. We're in a situation living in the US where if our currency collapses overnight, much of the developed world will feel the effects also. I guess that makes the second scenario the most likely situation for us, and as you say protecting your assets will be a high priority, which also justifies your earlier assessment about having more guns....or a good hiding spot.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
goodgrin
LSU Fan
Atlanta, GA
Member since Nov 2003
1249 posts

re: Gold is a stagnant investment
quote:

A gold buyer in 1981 would be a double loser.


Thank God I didn't buy gold in 1981. But... I bought gold bullion coins in 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012.


quote:

Plus it pays no dividends.


No it doesn't, but the right mining stocks will and the dividends should get larger when the price of gold rises.


It's this type of post that should cue one to start buying more gold. After all...
-The Euro crisis is over - No
-The debt ceiling is pretty much resolved - No
-The stock market is safe is for the average investor - hell no
-Unemployment is at 7.6%?

How about the real figures show that the labor force participation rate has just hit a 30 year low. The economy is failing to create new jobs.
-The US debt level will hit the danger zone that Greece was in just a few years ago when the European debt crisis started in a grand fashion.
-Is gold in a bubble? No one on this board has ever posted anything backing up this claim.
-Is gold expensive? It is, depending on your financial circumstances, but it will seem much more expensive when it's valued higher.

Another winning negative gold thread book marked for future shits and giggles.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
Page 1 of 1

Back to top

Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram