Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Business Insurance Question: Liabilty

Posted on 5/12/16 at 5:00 pm
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28080 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 5:00 pm
Let's say you are a tech company and you hire a sub to do construction work on a contract you have. ($500K)

If you get listed an an additional insured (statement of Subrogation) , will that be enough to protect you and your GL carrier?
This post was edited on 5/12/16 at 5:01 pm
Posted by BamaCoaster
God's Gulf
Member since Apr 2016
5253 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 5:04 pm to
Yes.
If you are listed, then you are covered under their GL policy.
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35478 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 5:12 pm to
I'd make sure they have at least a $1M policy. We are required to carry $2M for our data center work.
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28080 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 5:12 pm to
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28080 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

$2M


We have that as well. I'll check his limits, but they are a decent-sized company.
Posted by BamaCoaster
God's Gulf
Member since Apr 2016
5253 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 5:17 pm to
They should have 2 mil limits if their insurance dept/agent is worth anything.
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10229 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 5:24 pm to
Your covered. Sort of. Only for the job, only on the job site, only for what they do and only for the duration of the job.

So depending on the nature of the job, you might wish to request the following. Additional Insured, Primary and Non-Contributory, Including Completed Operations (the time period being based on severity of job, and statute of limitations). Ask them to waive their rights of recovery against you, on their liability, and on their worker's compensation. Either/and in the actual construction contract, and possibly endorsed on their policy(ies).

So if they're putting up towers as an example, you most definitely want additional insured completed operations. If they're doing programming, you want to see their technology professional and cyber coverages.

All pretty simple stuff if their agent knows what they're doing, and has their stuff done correctly. Unfortunately a lot of agents don't know what they're doing.

Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28080 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 5:37 pm to
Man, that's great advice.

They are basically digging holes for some fiber runs.

Thanks for the reply.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166134 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 6:02 pm to
Additional insured equivalent to form cg2037
Workers compensation policy w waiver of subrogation for your company
Attorney review the indemnification etc in contract.
That's a start
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28080 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

Attorney review the indemnification etc in contract.


Was gonna do this for sure, just neededsome food for thought.

The scope is so far out of what we do that if something happened, I didn't want to hang my GL carrier out to dry. (and myself)

Thanks Chad.
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17438 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 7:37 pm to
You forgot alternative employer on the comp.
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17438 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 7:37 pm to
Do you not have a competent agent?
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17438 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

Attorney review the indemnification etc in contract.
That's a start


Throwing away money doing that. A quality insurance agent can do this.
Posted by GoIrish02
Member since Mar 2012
1390 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:07 pm to
quote:


Throwing away money doing that. A quality insurance agent can do this.


A higher quality insurance agent knows not to practice law without a license. A good agent should review insurance requirements only and avoid giving global advice on indemnity agreements, which are usually far broader than the exclusions and limitations of an insurance contract.

Just like attorneys and accountants who think they're qualified to give insurance advice, agents who are comfortable (unwittingly) giving legal advice don't know the professional minefield they're entering.
This post was edited on 5/12/16 at 8:09 pm
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17438 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 8:39 pm to
Perhaps I should rephrase.

When your read thousands of contracts, a good agent can identify the red flags the same as an attorney.

The customer can then choose to engage an attorney, or request the language be changed.

I'm not talking about frank at Franks auto insurance and coffee. If you are dealing with a broker that is at a minimum regional, they should have well trained staff.
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28080 posts
Posted on 5/12/16 at 9:00 pm to
I haven't asked him yet, but I'm not sure he would know these things.

Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10229 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 10:31 am to
quote:

You forgot alternative employer on the comp.


Very good catch on your part.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166134 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:09 am to
quote:

You forgot alternative employer on the comp.


not sure this is necessary at all. I've seldom seen this requested especially in the construction industry with subcontractors etc.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166134 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:11 am to
quote:

When your read thousands of contracts, a good agent can identify the red flags the same as an attorney.


insurance agents shouldn't be giving out legal language advice. we do insurance. a smart agent shall know that he never wants to be on the hook of an indemnification clause he gave advice on.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram