- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Will LSU vs. Bama in the MNCG kill the BCS?
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:02 pm
I think LSU-Bama in the MNCG will kill the BCS and send us back to the pre-BCS bowl match-ups. Do you really think the Big-10, Pac-12 and Big-12 will continue under a system where 2 SEC teams get into the big money game and leave them high and dry? Especially if they have a conference champ with a better W-L record that actually looks better on paper than Bama? Where Bama gets in because mainly because the SEC is considered a better conference? If they bail on the BCS, then we'll go back to the days when the Big-10 and Pac-10 can win titles by avoiding playing the SEC champ. I don't like that!
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:03 pm to DocBugbear
Name a team other than LSU with a better win loss record than Bama
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:05 pm to macatak911
Yea good, but I meant a team with legit shot at BCSNCG
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:06 pm to The Mick
I abided by your set parameters then when surprisingly I come up with a legit answer, you change the parameters,
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:07 pm to DocBugbear
quote:
I think LSU-Bama in the MNCG will kill the BCS and send us back to the pre-BCS bowl match-ups. Do you really think the Big-10, Pac-12 and Big-12 will continue under a system where 2 SEC teams get into the big money game and leave them high and dry? Especially if they have a conference champ with a better W-L record that actually looks better on paper than Bama? Where Bama gets in because mainly because the SEC is considered a better conference? If they bail on the BCS, then we'll go back to the days when the Big-10 and Pac-10 can win titles by avoiding playing the SEC champ. I don't like that!
demographics are working against the big 1g, who happens to be the biggest opponent to a playoff...their precious rose bowl will not draw the ratings needed for the money....
to my way of thinking, if the bcs dies, it will be replaced with some sort of playoff....
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:08 pm to macatak911
quote:
I abided by your set parameters then when surprisingly I come up with a legit answer, you change the parameters,
Knowing Houston wouldn't fit the criteria you gave a smartass answer. So fault yourself for him having to spell it out.
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:08 pm to The Mick
quote:
Name a team other than LSU with a better win loss record than Bama
There's an "If" in front of that. If VaTech beats Clemson they'll be 12-1 to Bama's 11-1. If OSU beats OU they'll match at 11-1. Stanford also matches at 11-1, but they aren't a conference champ.
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:09 pm to DocBugbear
Oh I see, sorry. Misread OP.
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:10 pm to DocBugbear
quote:the payout for the bcs championship game is 18 million. other bcs bowls are 17 million. so this "big money" you are referring to is $2 million, since the big 10 will probably have 2 teams in bcs games
Do you really think the Big-10, Pac-12 and Big-12 will continue under a system where 2 SEC teams get into the big money game and leave them high and dry?
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:10 pm to macatak911
quote:
I abided by your set parameters then when surprisingly I come up with a legit answer,you changetheparameters,
Touche.
To the OP. Wtf is a (M)NCG?
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:12 pm to vl100butch
quote:
demographics are working against the big 1g, who happens to be the biggest opponent to a playoff...their precious rose bowl will not draw the ratings needed for the money....
to my way of thinking, if the bcs dies, it will be replaced with some sort of playoff....
The Big Ten commish was making comments last year that they would sooner go back to the old system than implement a playoff.
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:13 pm to bee Rye
quote:
the payout for the bcs championship game is 18 million. other bcs bowls are 17 million. so this "big money" you are referring to is $2 million, since the big 10 will probably have 2 teams in bcs games
The "big money" is not just the bowl payout, but the exposure for the conference. This will lead to a lot more revenue.
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:14 pm to DocBugbear
quote:
The Big Ten commish was making comments last year that they would sooner go back to the old system than implement a playoff.
and he very well may find himself and his conference becoming as relevant as the ivy league....
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:14 pm to DocBugbear
quote:
The Big Ten commish was making comments last year that they would sooner go back to the old system than implement a playoff
You are correct. The first step trying to be implemented is turning over the BCS bowl games back to the NCAA.
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:14 pm to 13SaintTiger
quote:
To the OP. Wtf is a (M)NCG?
M = "Mythical" ...as any championship game that doesn't come from a full playoff doesn't count in NCAA records.
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:17 pm to vl100butch
quote:
and he very well may find himself and his conference becoming as relevant as the ivy league....
Unlikely as the PAC-12 and Big-12 seem to fall inline with whatever the Big-10 wants. Delaney (B10 commish) is the main reason there isn't a playoff or even a "+1",
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:19 pm to DocBugbear
quote:
M = "Mythical" ...asany championship game thatdoesn't come from a full playoff doesn't count in NCAArecords.
Gay. Why can't you just say BCSNCG? Is mythical necessary? Because the game is being played. Mythical is more like what unicorns are.
This post was edited on 11/28/11 at 8:21 pm
Posted on 11/28/11 at 8:22 pm to 13SaintTiger
quote:
Gay. Why can't you just say BCSNCG? Is mythical necessary? Because the game is being played. Mythical is more like what unicorns.
It's a pretty common phrase. I use it because 1) I want a playoff, and 2) I'm lazy and it's 2 letters shorter.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News