Started By
Message

re: Toss Power could have some competition

Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:06 am to
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
18131 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:06 am to
quote:

with Harris essentially as a first year starter.



there's that excuse again, as if first-year starters can't play well in college ball.

6 of the last 7 national champions have had first-year starting QBs.

3 of the last 5 Heisman QB winners were first-year starters.
Posted by Tigers_Saints
Member since Jun 2016
949 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Shotgun runs give LF a few more yards of momentum that makes him even harder to stop at the LOS.


Not compared to the toss dive or i-formation. The momentum is actually a plus for the toss dive.

Running back is going to be 5-7 yards back out of the i-form
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Tigers_Saints
quote:

Here's a link to the harris interception. It wasn't some great play or read by the defender.


So you're saying it wasn't defended properly? Which said proper defense would come with-as I said-proper film study of one of the less than half of a half dozen short-intermediate throws Less allows into his offense.

So we agree then. Yay!
This post was edited on 7/27/16 at 10:17 am
Posted by Tigers_Saints
Member since Jun 2016
949 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:11 am to
quote:

1:23 3rd Quarter, 3rd & 16 on the LSU 2 -


quote:
One-man route concept. Dural is double covered. No where to go with the ball.



1. We were on our own 2 yard line
2. We couldn't block Alabama, and we were passing out of our own endzone

You take a quick shot downfield there, and we almost made a play.

I mean that isn't really a series that you can put on playcalling IMO. The sack on the first play ended that drive against that front 7 out of the endzone. We lost the field position battle and that series is the result.
This post was edited on 7/27/16 at 10:12 am
Posted by Tigers_Saints
Member since Jun 2016
949 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:16 am to
quote:

So you're saying it wasn't defended properly?


Where did I say that? The defender dropped back into an underneath zone leaving the TE open for an easy completion. The throw was missed.

I'm saying that it was a low risk play that should have led to a manageable 2nd down. It was just a poor throw.

quote:

So we agree then. Yay!



No, we don't. The Saints run a similar play to that 100x over the course of a season. A lot of offenses do.

The point is to get the QB out of the pocket, where they were killing us, and the ball out of his hand. That was not a bad play call.

Bitching about it is just idiotic.

There is plenty to complain about with this offense. That interception isn't one of them. Any college QB should be able to make that throw/read 99 out of 100x. It puts you in a good 2nd down opportunity.
This post was edited on 7/27/16 at 10:18 am
Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13734 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:18 am to

quote:

there's that excuse again, as if first-year starters can't play well in college ball.


Saying that Harris was a first year starter is not an excuse. It is a fact.

quote:

6 of the last 7 national champions have had first-year starting QBs.


3 of those are from Alabama which is a complete outlier from every other program in the country.
2 were Heisman trophy winners and 1st picks in the draft.
1 was a freak of nature 3rd string qb in an extreme QB friendly offense with the second best coach in college football.

quote:

3 of the last 5 Heisman QB winners were first-year starters.


Jameis Winston
Johnny Manziel
Cam Newton

Exceptions not the rule. Like saying all sub 6'0" QB's should be great because look at Drew Brees and Russel Wilson. Yea it can happen but their are hundred of others just like them that didn't work.
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10086 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:21 am to
quote:

So since you don't remember two third down plays inside LSU's territory where LSU went pass but only had one receiver actually run a route,
That's the one drive inside 10 besides the kneel where LSU didn't get a first.
Backed up, the 22 set pass is protect/run sell bait and sometimes catches fish, but Saban's DBs are pretty well disciplined.
With so many play options from your own 2, I guess an offensive genius would've went 5WR.
This post was edited on 7/27/16 at 10:24 am
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Tigers_Saints
quote:

No, we don't. The Saints run a similar play to that 100x over the course of a season. A lot of offenses do.


This is rich. I agree with you absolutely. The Saints do, and many offenses do. The difference is that they run MANY passing plays and are diverse enough from a schematic and formation standpoint that those plays are more effective.

Why? Because the diversity of formation and number of plays means defenses aren't as easily able to read their keys pre-snap and defend plays more easily.

We don't have a diversity of plays (we don't have a diversity of thought if you ask me either, but that's besides the point). This makes us easier to defend and when we run such types of plays from such a small number of formations then we literally start to box ourselves in. Nothing works because we don't really put effort into disguising, being multiple, or doing what those many other offenses-including the Saints-try to do in order to make those few precious plays they all share more effective.

quote:

The point is to get the QB out of the pocket, where they were killing us, and the ball out of his hand. That was not a bad play call.


I disagree. If the point is to try and win the game, that's not a winning play. You can put the QB on the move. You can chip with a TE and keep a FB in and still run multi-receiver routes, or you can-THE HORROR-call an intermediate route with a mesh concept or drag route across the middle of the field that doesn't require a deep drop where the Rush has a chance to get to the QB.

quote:

Bitching about it is just idiotic.


Because I disagree with you? Because I provide context? Because I don't just kowtow to the line that somehow not using the intermediate pass, a diversity of formation, or shading the C Gap with a TE and running 6" OL splits on EVERY DAMN DOWN is somehow ground-breaking and enough for us to be successful?

Newsflash: Les has proven it can't be successful. To everyone but himself and F. King Alexander. Who was more than likely only worried about dollar signs last November and not whether Les is capable of taking us to the Promised Land. But you keep on telling us how folks who bitch are idiotic.

quote:

There is plenty to complain about with this offense.


I knew we could agree.
Posted by Howyouluhdat
On Fleek St
Member since Jan 2015
7318 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Harris threw an incredibly inaccurate ball, likely because of his injury.



Love hearing this.
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10086 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:32 am to
quote:

You can put the QB on the move. You can chip with a TE and keep a FB in and still run multi-receiver routes, or you can-THE HORROR-call an intermediate route with a mesh concept or drag route across the middle of the field that doesn't require a deep drop where the Rush has a chance to get to the QB.
Your herniated QB has struggled with reads, and accuracy on basic pass plays and you want to do this from the 2yd line.
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
18131 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Saying that Harris was a first year starter is not an excuse. It is a fact.


of course I'm not implying that every first-year starter can win the NC or the Heisman.

But my overall point is that many schools somehow manage to get first-year starting QBs to play very well.
Posted by N.O. via West-Cal
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
7178 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:35 am to
"That Bama front 7 ranks top 5 all-time, maybe even top 3

true, but other teams moved the ball on them and - gasp - even scored points. There is no reason for us to accept not being able to do so. It's not 1970.
Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13734 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:37 am to
quote:

ut my overall point is that many schools somehow manage to get first-year starting QBs to play very well.


Harris played well at some points and bad at some points. Things that a lot of first year starting QB's do. He has the ability to improve. Will he? We have to wait and see.
Posted by Tigers_Saints
Member since Jun 2016
949 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:58 am to
quote:

The Saints do, and many offenses do. The difference is that they run MANY passing plays and are diverse enough from a schematic and formation standpoint that those plays are more effective.


We literally had a receiver open for an easy completion. Seems like the type of play to get "Harris the first year starter" into a rhythm and out of playaction.

quote:

. If the point is to try and win the game, that's not a winning play.


What is a "winning play"? A "winning play" is checking down to the open TE for positive gain on 1st down to give your team a manageable 2nd down.

The play was open. Pretty simple

quote:

or you can-THE HORROR-call an intermediate route with a mesh concept or drag route across the middle of the field that doesn't require a deep drop where the Rush has a chance to get to the QB.


They were absolutely dominating us right up the middle and generating pressure on slants and ins. We tried intermediate over the middle, we tried intermediate on the sidelines.

Bama defends quick routes very, very well with the pressure they generate and their press coverage.

It is simple: It wasn't an interception because of film study or a great play by the defender. It was an interception because Harris missed an easy and open pass that generates a positive gain on 1st down, something we were unable to establish with our running game. Bitching about that play is just laughable, but keep sucking your own dick with this elite football knowledge you think you possess.





This post was edited on 7/27/16 at 11:03 am
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68422 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 11:01 am to
quote:

Thats what I'm trying to figure out. Could've sworn we stayed in I formation damn near the whole night vs Bama.


Because the idiots say that. You have video evidence rt there that LSU doesn't just line up in I formation yet people continue to say that's all they do.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68422 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 11:04 am to
quote:

That's a HOTTAKE if ever there was one. It's like saying that someone will win Powerball before New Year's Eve, 2016. Don't inch too far out onto that limb, Bro!


Get a grip dude.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68422 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Why? Because the diversity of formation and number of plays means defenses aren't as easily able to read their keys pre-snap and defend plays more easily. 

We don't have a diversity of plays (we don't have a diversity of thought if you ask me either, but that's besides the point). This makes us easier to defend and when we run such types of plays from such a small number of formations then we literally start to box ourselves in. Nothing works because we don't really put effort into disguising, being multiple, or doing what those many other offenses-including the Saints-try to do in order to make those few precious plays they all share more effective. 



Reality, you aren't in it.

This is college football. Not the fricking NFL. Coaches get limited time to work with players.

TOSU, urban Meyer offense. Had trouble last season at times because the defense picked up on Jones clapping. The d would run up and start clapping and screw up their counts. Good DCs will find were the offense can be predictable. Chavis did it just fine most of the time.

The offense in college is simple. That's why for some of the most gifted guys, like cam Newton, it takes a few years to realize their full potential, grasping the entire offense of an NFL team.

Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Mayhawman
quote:

Your herniated QB has struggled with reads, and accuracy on basic pass plays and you want to do this from the 2yd line.


So now you're laughing at me, but what about when Les called for moving the pocket and throwing a pass that required accuracy on the play where Lee picked Harris off?

You laugh at Less there too?
Posted by caliegeaux
Member since Aug 2004
10124 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 11:20 am to
I as well have a very faded memory from that game due to some PBR impairments...however, I thought I remembered being under center a lot early on. THEN, going in the shotgun, but not only that, but running Harris from the shotgun.....and during that time we got our FG and TD's.....then the INT to open the 2nd and Harris' injury, we went back under center.

Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 11:20 am to
quote:

dgnx6
quote:

Reality, you aren't in it.

This is college football. Not the fricking NFL. Coaches get limited time to work with players.



Follow the thread dumbf#ck. Someone ELSE brought the Saints up and their success in using a play like that. Not me. So it was someone on your side of the discussion that isn't in reality. Not me.

You may want to be in this thread and following along before you editorialize or criticize.

Good try at a #sickburn though, Brah.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram