Started By
Message

re: Projected RPI of 57

Posted on 3/13/15 at 5:18 pm to
Posted by jacquespene8
Nashville, TN
Member since Sep 2007
4141 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 5:18 pm to
Is it a criteria to have a better RPI?
Posted by Broyota2
Member since Nov 2010
13037 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 5:18 pm to
Key word though "projected." Who knows until Sunday. I think we are in IMO.
Posted by Geauxld Finger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
31676 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 5:18 pm to
we are getting left out like SMU did last year
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
25506 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 5:20 pm to
Lots of bubble teams didn't get it done though. Texas and Texas A&M to name a couple.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
36809 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

Such a weak argument that's impossible to do until the conference tournaments end.
You called lsumatt weak.

Yet you already have LSU out.

What a troll.
Posted by BobBarker
Bompton
Member since Nov 2012
11657 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 5:22 pm to
SMU was left out because they were 0-7 against the RPI Top 50.
Posted by fightingtiger2335
heh?
Member since Aug 2007
61157 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 5:23 pm to
About 3 or 4 teams a year get in with a rpi of 51-60

Cbs did a writeup on it the other day


Over 60 only 2 have gotten in since 2011
Posted by TigerCub
Team Boxtard
Member since May 2006
20174 posts
Posted on 3/13/15 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

@slmandel: LSU's resume is ... Unique. 13-5 vs Top 100 (fantastic), but 5 <100 losses (terrible). Should still be OK, committee loves to see good Ws.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram