Started By
Message

re: No West Coast Hosting Super Regional

Posted on 6/2/15 at 7:51 am to
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 7:51 am to
Yes
Posted by goatman1419
Prairieville,LA
Member since Jan 2007
3070 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 7:54 am to
quote:

not that it matters really, but them being #1 was a joke


NCAA favoritism at its finest.
Posted by rlebl39
League City, TX
Member since Jun 2011
4740 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 7:55 am to
quote:

does this limit the number of attractive women in the stands?


In 2013 in Omaha there were some smoking hot women in the stands that UCLA brought with them. Made me wish I went to UCLA.
Posted by LSUTygerFan
Homerun Village
Member since Jun 2008
33232 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 7:59 am to
quote:

Yes


immediately thought of your pic when i saw the thread title.
Posted by Tigersport2014
Member since Aug 2014
824 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 9:43 am to
".. In 2013 in Omaha there were some smoking hot women in the stands that UCLA brought with them. Made me wish I went to UCLA. "

*****************************************************************

... they just could be the permanent No.1 "seed" in that area ... hoowhee
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
19257 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:32 am to
So assuming LSU wins the SR we'll be seeded #1 in Omaha, right? Meaning LSU will play the #8 seed?
Posted by LSUTygerFan
Homerun Village
Member since Jun 2008
33232 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:34 am to
I wonder if we can hire a few of ucla's female fans to decorate the box this weekend?
Posted by Jay Quest
Once removed from Massachusetts
Member since Nov 2009
9800 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:34 am to
Poor Missouri State. National seed going on the road.
Posted by CheerWhine
A little bit of Mardi Gras
Member since Apr 2014
72406 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:40 am to
quote:

So assuming LSU wins the SR we'll be seeded #1 in Omaha, right? Meaning LSU will play the #8 seed?


No re-seeding in Omaha, the brackets stay the same throughout. If we get there, we'll play the winner of TCU/A&M in the first game.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
33979 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 11:06 am to
The whole seeding situation this year was totally contrived as to keep the SEC from having "too many" natl seeds.
Posted by Armymann50
Playing with my
Member since Sep 2011
17035 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 11:10 am to
quote:

UCLA was the #1 overall seed.
There will be corrections made
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 11:16 am to
I had no problem with UCLA getting the top seed. Frankly, LSU's out of conference schedule is an embarrassment this year, and I'm not too surprised the committee dinged us for it. LSU's non-conference SOS ranked 246th (UCLA's was 21st). LSU had 10 wins over teams ranked over 150 in the RPI. Among top 10 teams in the RPI, only 4 did not play 10 games against 150+ RPI teams (FSU and Vandy at 9, UCLA and Florida at 6).

The committee has always stressed scheduling. So I'm not really onboard with LSU pretending we're victims of seeding. LSU should play someone OOC.

Last year, the SEC did a faceplant in the tourney, so this year it looks like it is the Pac-12's turn. I don't read anything long term into it, just like the SEC's lousy tourney last year was meaningless (of course, Vandy won anyway).
Posted by MrPackSix
Lakeview/God's Country
Member since Oct 2009
8220 posts
Posted on 6/2/15 at 11:18 am to
quote:

We can laugh at UCLA and the Pac-12 doing a great Ole Miss impression this season for the CWS but UCLA and USC can and do seriously bring it in the female eye candy department.


If Florida St advances to Omaha they will fill in nicely
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram