Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

My Argument on Why TM7 Should Win Heisman

Posted on 12/7/11 at 1:44 pm
Posted by kkroli1
Houston, Texas
Member since Nov 2007
336 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 1:44 pm
My argument is this. Every year we see four quarterbacks with 3500 yards and twenty some-odd touchdowns. Every year we see RB's with monster numbers. I don't find them that spectacular. Often, they are just products of a system, e.g., Graham Harrell or Colt Brennan.

You see a player like Tyrann Mathieu once in a decade. He is spectacular, and it should be rewarded. Quarterbacks and RB's can be replaced - he can't. That is all.
Posted by bagNdrag
Member since Dec 2010
1906 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 1:46 pm to
good point
Posted by Carlton Banks
Bel-Air, Los Angeles, California
Member since Feb 2008
1578 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 1:47 pm to
These were my thoughts, as well. You don't see a player like Tyrann Mathieu that often.
Posted by Comp721
Member since Oct 2009
1585 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 1:49 pm to
haden't thought of it like that.
Posted by LSU25Tigers
Lafayette, La
Member since Oct 2007
238 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 1:49 pm to
Couldn't agree more!!
Posted by tadelatt
Buga Nation
Member since Jan 2010
12253 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 1:53 pm to
What is funny is that all preseason All-whatever teams, prospects, etc...

Only Morris Claiborne got love in those and he was usually rated near the 50's.

Now TM7 is a Heisman finalist and Mo is a Top 10 draft pick!
Posted by MattLSU
New York
Member since Dec 2011
195 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 1:54 pm to
You're absolutely right.
Posted by Jsoula
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
291 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 1:56 pm to
Why can't someone just point this FACT out to the rest of the biased, hype frenzied talking heads??

The Heisman is a JOKE.

Posted by LoneStarTigers
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
112 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 1:56 pm to
All very good points...

TM7 deserves the Heisman.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89477 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 1:59 pm to
He's the best player on the best team. Why is that criteria thrown out ONLY when LSU is the best team?

2003 - NOBODY got Heisman chatter.

2007 - Putt finished 9th, but was limited down the stretch, and as much as TM7 is not going to get it (this year at least), a DT in 2007 was really not going to get it.

In addition to being the best player on the best team, he's the single most dynamic, exciting playmaker in all of college football this year. Certainly the closest to a $cam Newton, with much less (but not "none") off-the-field baggage.
Posted by tkr1407
Nawfiest Laweezianna
Member since Aug 2011
3132 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 2:06 pm to
I could not agree more! TM7 for Heisman!!!!
Posted by WTIGER
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
991 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 2:11 pm to

Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10378 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 2:17 pm to
Good post. This is also why I thought Suh should have won it in 2009. He was the most "outstanding" college football player for the season, which is who the Heisman is supposed to go to.
Posted by PtownJacks
Patterson
Member since Oct 2006
143 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 2:27 pm to
TM7 does not deserve the Heisman. He is a good football player, but to call him the BEST is a bit overboard. He does alot of great things to help us, but he is not the best player in the country. He isnt even the best DB we have. I'm just glad LSU is getting the national attention it brings with it.
Posted by ksliman
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2006
1166 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 2:39 pm to
Absolutely great point.....

But TM doesn't play for BAMA or ND or USC and, like others, has to be much better than a player at one of those schools to be considered.

For example, the leader on some ballots...

6th place in Rushing Yds (1583, #1 with 1759)
5th place in TDs (20, #1 with 32)

And before you start, please don't bore me with the "body of work" or "who his worst game" was against.

That argument is old, worn out and just doesn't work anymore.
Posted by LaronLandry30
Jackson MS
Member since Jan 2009
29 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 2:39 pm to
I agree he is not the best cover db on our team. but he is the best nickelback in the country. He has made game changing plays on both defense and special teams, changed the momentum in several big games, scored touchdowns, recorded sacks, leads in tackles, 120 return yards w/ a td on the big stage this week, and he's done it all for the #1, undefeated team that is being mentioned (outside of the rant) among the greatest college football teams of all time.

I say he deserves it
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89477 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

He isnt even the best DB we have.


Can you at least concede that, for example, in 1997, Cecil Collins (when healthy) was the best RB on the LSU team, while Kevin Faulk (at the same position) was the best "football player" on the team?

What's so complicated with the assertion that Mo Claiborne is the best DB on the 2011 Tigers (and to credit B. Taylor, Reid, Simon, Mathieu and even Brooks - that's saying a whole lot), while Mathieu is the best "football player" on the best team in college football?

I believe and assert it to be true. Disagree if you wish, but can you say it's crazy? Not arguable?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram